| Literature DB >> 31064054 |
Qiuzhen Wang1,2, Huike Ye3, Yunxuan Xie4, Yaodong He5, Biswarup Sen6, Guangyi Wang7,8.
Abstract
Labyrinthulomycete protists have gained significant attention in the recent past for their biotechnpan>ological importance. Yet, theirEntities:
Keywords: batch culture; isolation; labyrinthulids; lipid profiling; optimization; phylogeny; thraustochytrids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31064054 PMCID: PMC6562557 DOI: 10.3390/md17050268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Distribution of sampling sites in the mangrove habitats of China.
Information about sampling, isolation and identification of thraustochytrid and labyrinthulid strains.
| Sampling Site | Sampling Date | Latitude (°N) | Longitude (°E) | Number of Isolates | Genus Level Classification | Number of Strains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haikou, Hainan (HNHK) | 2015.07 | 20.06231 | 110.3352 | 69 |
| 17 |
| Haikou, Hainan (HNU) | 2016.03 | 20.06344 | 110.3345 | 23 |
| 6 |
| Beihai, Guangxi (GXBH) | 2016.04 | 21.41175 | 109.1626 | 54 |
| 32 |
| Qinzhou, Guangxi (GXQZ) | 2016.04 | 21.74423 | 108.5903 | 16 |
| 11 |
| Shenzhen, Guangdong (GDSZ) | 2015.08 | 22.52029 | 113.9496 | 22 |
| 2 |
| Longhai, Fujian (FJLH) | 2015.09 | 24.43823 | 117.9037 | 7 |
| 2 |
| Quanzhou, Fujian (FJQZ) | 2015.09 | 24.94337 | 118.6748 | 6 |
| 0 |
| Zhangzhou, Fujian (FJZZ) | 2015.09 | 23.92075 | 117.4167 | 10 | 0 | |
| Wenzhou, Zhejiang (ZJWZ) | 2015.09 | 28.34687 | 121.1738 | 5 |
| 1 |
List of different genera of thraustochytrid and labyrinthulid strains isolated in this study.
| Group | Genus | Number of Isolates in Each Genus | Number of Sequences Submitted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thraustochytrids |
| 129 | 27 |
|
| 46 | 7 | |
|
| 6 | 6 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | 2 | |
| Labyrinthulids |
| 28 | 28 |
Figure 2A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of Labyrinthulomycetes isolated from coastal mangrove areas of China. The branch lengths of the tree are represented by the “Tree scale” shown in the upper-left corner.
Figure 3The DHA production profile of potential strains of thraustochytrids and labyrinthulids.
Fatty acid composition (percentage), biomass, and yield and productivity of total fatty acids (TFAs) of high docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-producing (>10% biomass) thraustochytrid and labyrinthulid strains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C12:0 | 1.49 ± 0.26 | 1.45 ± 0.12 | 0.56 ± 0.08 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.96 ± 0.10 | 0.43 ± 0.22 | 1.13 ± 0.10 | 0.70 ± 0.27 |
| C14:0 | 4.85 ± 0.02 | 4.35 ± 0.04 | 3.90 ± 0.06 | 4.10 ± 0.34 | 4.70 ± 0.04 | 5.01 ± 0.12 | 4.39 ± 0.09 | 5.01 ± 0.04 |
| C15:0 | 1.88 ± 0.01 | 1.74 ± 0.01 | 1.75 ± 0.18 | 4.58 ± 0.27 | 2.09 ± 0.00 | 2.01 ± 0.00 | 2.19 ± 0.04 | 1.82 ± 0.02 |
| C16:0 | 41.77 ± 0.33 | 46.08 ± 0.29 | 37.19 ± 0.63 | 46.32 ± 1.02 | 36.11 ± 0.33 | 40.09 ± 0.23 | 36.70 ± 0.37 | 42.57± 0.14 |
| C17:0 | 0.48 ± 0.00 | 0.53 ± 0.00 | 0.66 ± 0.07 | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.01 |
| C18:0 | 0.91 ± 0.02 | 1.09 ± 0.00 | 0.88 ± 0.04 | 0.95 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.00 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 0.80 ± 0.03 |
| C18:1n9 | 0.38 ± 0.00 | 0.32 ± 0.00 | 0.54 ± 0.10 | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 0.43 ± 0.00 | 0.49 ± 0.00 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.33 ± 0.00 |
| C20:4n6 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.39 ± 0.00 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 0.55 ± 0.00 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.00 |
| C20:5n3 | 0.32 ± 0.00 | 0.24 ± 0.00 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.00 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.02 |
| C22:5n3 | 7.63 ± 0.01 | 7.42 ± 0.02 | 9.77 ± 0.27 | 8.23 ± 0.40 | 8.52 ± 0.06 | 7.98 ± 0.01 | 9.26 ± 0.17 | 7.48 ± 0.09 |
| C22:6n3 | 37.68 ± 0.06 | 34.31 ± 0.17 | 42.95 ± 1.02 | 28.54 ± 1.34 | 42.33 ± 0.54 | 39.60 ± 0.27 | 41.24 ± 0.35 | 37.72± 0.28 |
| Total SFAs | 51.38 | 55.25 | 44.94 | 57.45 | 45.11 | 48.79 | 45.8 | 51.42 |
| Total PUFAs | 46.07 | 42.36 | 53.69 | 37.05 | 51.77 | 48.47 | 51.38 | 46.04 |
| Biomass (g/L) | 6.83 ± 0.11 | 6.72 ± 0.22 | 1.72 ± 0.22 | 4.85 ± 0.45 | 7.52 ± 0.06 | 7.28 ± 0.23 | 7.45 ± 0.11 | 7.28 ± 0.07 |
| TFAs yield (% biomass) | 44.18 ± 1.15 | 40.2 ± 2.24 | 32.03 ± 5.88 | 47.57 ± 0.36 | 30.69 ± 0.50 | 32.57 ± 0.21 | 30.68 ± 7.09 | 33.5 ± 0.47 |
| TFAs productivity (g/L/d) | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.14 | 0.60 ± 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| C12:0 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.10 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.62 ± 0.25 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | |
| C14:0 | 4.33 ± 0.51 | 5.70 ± 0.04 | 3.89 ± 0.16 | 4.67 ± 0.39 | 3.87 ± 0.19 | 4.56 ± 0.02 | 4.50 ± 0.22 | |
| C15:0 | 2.16 ± 0.13 | 1.72 ± 0.01 | 2.16 ± 0.09 | 1.73 ± 0.09 | 1.86 ± 0.04 | 1.54 ± 0.01 | 1.38 ± 0.02 | |
| C16:0 | 40.61 ± 0.67 | 42.16 ± 0.04 | 38.54 ± 1.71 | 46.38 ± 0.49 | 42.47 ± 0.29 | 37.03 ± 0.07 | 45.89 ± 0.51 | |
| C17:0 | 0.71 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.00 | 0.64 ± 0.11 | 0.56 ± 0.11 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.00 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | |
| C18:0 | 0.87 ± 0.06 | 0.77 ± 0.00 | 0.88 ± 0.03 | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.00 | 1.08 ± 0.09 | |
| C18:1n9 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 0.39 ± 0.00 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.38 ± 0.00 | |
| C20:4n6 | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.29 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | |
| C20:5n3 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.00 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | |
| C22:5n3 | 8.96 ± 0.50 | 7.31 ± 0.06 | 8.81 ± 0.42 | 7.77 ± 0.15 | 8.42 ± 0.28 | 8.36 ± 0.04 | 7.82 ± 0.04 | |
| C22:6n3 | 39.55 ± 0.89 | 37.80 ± 0.16 | 39.38 ± 2.72 | 35.54 ± 0.30 | 39.14 ± 0.30 | 42.73 ± 0.09 | 36.32 ± 0.32 | |
| Total SFAs | 48.81 | 51.44 | 46.25 | 54.38 | 50.03 | 44.85 | 53.35 | |
| Total PUFAs | 49.34 | 45.98 | 49.21 | 44.17 | 48.48 | 52.07 | 45.04 | |
| Biomass (g/L) | 6.48 ± 0.25 | 7.22 ± 0.10 | 6.97 ± 0.18 | 6.72 ± 0.18 | 7.00 ± 0.06 | 7.51 ± 0.26 | 6.8 ± 0.32 | |
| TFAs yield (% biomass) | 31.6 ± 0.98 | 30.26 ± 0.23 | 28.67 ± 4.18 | 31.48 ± 4.32 | 26.07 ± 1.90 | 30.88 ± 2.64 | 30.4 ± 0.51 | |
| TFAs productivity (g/L/d) | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.00 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.53 ± 0.24 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.03 |
Note: SFAs: saturated fatty acids; PUFAs: polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Significant (P < 0.05, analysis of variance (ANOVA)) parameters that influenced the cell biomass, DHA, and SFAs production of Aurantiochytrium sp. ZJWZ-7.
| Cell biomass (DCW, g/L) | DHA (g/L) | SFAs (g/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon source | Carbon source | Nitrogen source |
| Nitrogen source | Nitrogen source | KH2PO4 |
| Salinity | Initial pH | Salinity |
| Initial pH | Temperature | Initial pH |
| Temperature | Rotation rate | Temperature |
| Rotation rate | Rotation rate |
Figure 4The cell biomass, DHA and SFAs production of Aurantiochytrium sp. ZJWZ-7 under varying (a) carbon sources and (b) nitrogen sources. Data are shown for samples collected at 72 h of cultivation.
Effect of medium components and process conditions on the cell biomass, DHA and SFAs production of Aurantiochytrium sp. ZJWZ-7.
| Culture Condition | Biomass | DHA | SFAs | DHA | SFAs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KH2PO4 (g/L) | |||||
| 0 | 6.53 | 1.20 | 1.69 | 36.70 | 51.34 |
| 0.1 | 6.81 | 1.31 | 1.85 | 37.56 | 51.72 |
| 0.25 | 6.83 | 1.14 | 1.52 | 37.68 | 50.36 |
| 0.4 | 6.82 | 1.14 | 1.53 | 37.94 | 49.72 |
| 0.8 | 6.99 | 1.07 | 1.45 | 37.62 | 49.78 |
| Salinity (% seawater) | |||||
| 0 | 5.62 | 0.91 | 1.05 | 35.32 | 51.44 |
| 20 | 6.99 | 0.99 | 1.04 | 37.32 | 49.28 |
| 40 | 6.87 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 37.21 | 50.53 |
| 60 | 6.88 | 1.10 | 1.25 | 36.43 | 51.96 |
| 80 | 6.74 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 36.95 | 50.26 |
| 100 | 6.83 | 1.14 | 1.52 | 37.68 | 50.36 |
| 120 | 6.61 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 36.87 | 48.65 |
| Temperature (℃) | |||||
| 20 | 6.56 | 1.01 | 1.58 | 39.41 | 50.46 |
| 25 | 6.58 | 1.14 | 1.49 | 38.38 | 50.76 |
| 28 | 6.83 | 1.14 | 1.52 | 37.68 | 50.36 |
| 32 | 5.73 | 0.91 | 1.29 | 35.86 | 50.08 |
| 35 | 4.98 | 0.51 | 0.83 | 34.01 | 53.82 |
| Initial pH | |||||
| 4 | 7.21 | 1.21 | 1.39 | 40.62 | 46.09 |
| 5 | 6.57 | 1.04 | 1.53 | 36.33 | 52.76 |
| 6 | 6.46 | 1.07 | 1.33 | 37.87 | 50.49 |
| 6.47 | 6.83 | 1.14 | 1.52 | 37.68 | 50.36 |
| 7 | 6.54 | 1.23 | 1.41 | 40.68 | 46.51 |
| 8 | 5.49 | 0.82 | 1.23 | 35.08 | 52.80 |
| Rotation rate (rpm) | |||||
| 100 | 6.14 | 0.91 | 1.08 | 39.91 | 47.86 |
| 150 | 6.83 | 1.14 | 1.52 | 37.68 | 50.36 |
| 180 | 6.41 | 1.04 | 1.58 | 33.88 | 53.95 |
| 200 | 6.51 | 0.99 | 1.33 | 36.67 | 50.57 |
| 250 | 3.55 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 35.46 | 53.37 |
Fatty acid composition (% TFAs) of 4-days grown Aurantiochytrium sp. ZJWZ-7 culture on optimal medium.
| Strains | ZJWZ-7 |
|---|---|
| C12:0 | 0.15 ± 0.00 |
| C14:0 | 3.28 ± 0.02 |
| C15:0 | 1.89 ± 0.02 |
| C16:0 | 37.63 ± 0.15 |
| C17:0 | 0.22 ± 0.00 |
| C18:0 | 0.84 ± 0.02 |
| C18:3n3 | 0.17 ± 0.00 |
| C20:0 | 0.12 ± 0.00 |
| C21:0 | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
| C20:3n6 | 0.42 ± 0.03 |
| C20:4n6 | 0.23 ± 0.00 |
| C20:5n3 | 0.06 ± 0.00 |
| C22:5n3 | 7.57 ± 0.00 |
| C22:6n3 | 44.52 ± 0.12 |
| Total PUFAs | 52.97 |
| Total SFAs | 44.40 |
| Biomass (g/L) | 9.88 |
| TFAs yield (% biomass) | 37.69 |
| DHA (g/g) | 0.17 |
| DHA (g/L) | 1.66 |
| PUFAs (g/L) | 2.00 |
| SFAs (g/g) | 0.17 |
| SFAs (g/L) | 1.68 |
Note: PUFAs: polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFAs: saturated fatty acids; TFAs: total fatty acids; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid.