| Literature DB >> 31062079 |
Shun Katada1, Aya Yanagimoto2, Yuji Matsui2, Masanobu Hibi2, Noriko Osaki2, Shigeru Kobayashi3, Yoshihisa Katsuragi4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It has been reported that tea catechins increase energy metabolism, but their effect on resting metabolic rate (RMR) remains under debate. This study aimed to examine the effect of repeated intake of tea catechins on energy metabolism in the resting state in middle-aged men and women.Entities:
Keywords: Body temperature; Energy expenditure; Middle-aged men and women; Resting metabolic rate; Tea catechins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31062079 PMCID: PMC7098939 DOI: 10.1007/s00394-019-01976-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nutr ISSN: 1436-6207 Impact factor: 5.614
Composition of the test beverages
| Placebo beverage | Catechin beverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Catechin (mg) | 0 | 34 |
| Epicatechin (mg) | 0 | 32 |
| Gallocatechin (mg) | 0 | 134 |
| Epigallocatechin (mg) | 0 | 118 |
| Catechin gallate (mg) | 0 | 25 |
| Epicatechin gallate (mg) | 0 | 39 |
| Gallocatechin gallate (mg) | 0 | 111 |
| Epigallocatechin gallate (mg) | 0 | 118 |
| Total catechins (mg) | 0 | 611 |
| Caffeine (mg) | 81 | 88 |
Fig. 1Diagrammatic representation of the study design
Subject characteristics at baseline
| Age, y | 52 ± 4 |
| Sex, M/F, | 16/10 |
| Height (cm) | 166.4 ± 8.2 |
| Body weight (kg) | 61.6 ± 9.6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.1 ± 2.1 |
| FFM (kg) | 47.2 ± 8.4 |
| FM (kg) | 14.4 ± 4.3 |
| Fat ratio (%) | 23.4 ± 6.4 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 123 ± 19 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 76 ± 15 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 86 ± 7 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.4 ± 0.2 |
| Insulin (μU/mL) | 2.8 ± 1.4 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 197 ± 23 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 114 ± 25 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 60 ± 12 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 92 ± 41 |
| Free T3 (pg/mL) | 3.1 ± 0.3 |
| Free T4 (ng/dL) | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| TSH (μIU/mL) | 1.140 ± 0.560 |
| Noradrenaline (ng/mL) | 0.33 ± 0.11 |
| Cortisol (μg/dL) | 7.8 ±2.5 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 26
DBP diastolic blood pressure, FFM fat-free mass, FM fat mass, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, T3 triiodothyronine, T4 thyroxine, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone, SBP systolic blood pressure
Resting metabolic rate (RMR), energy expenditure (EE) after ingestion of test beverages and respiratory quotient (RQ) after the 2-week intervention
| Placebo treatment | Catechin treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting RMR (kJ/day) | 5269 ± 781 | 5291 ± 780 | 0.681 |
| EE after ingestion (kJ/day) | 5502 ± 757 | 5598 ± 800 | 0.041a |
| Changes in EE (kJ/day) | 233 ± 209 | 307 ± 259 | 0.186 |
| Fasting RQ | 0.868 ± 0.041 | 0.874 ± 0.035 | 0.398 |
| RQ after ingestion | 0.854 ± 0.026 | 0.863 ± 0.035 | 0.104 |
| Changes in RQ | − 0.015 ± 0.024 | − 0.011 ± 0.030 | 0.525 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 26
aPaired t test P < 0.05
Fig. 2Time profile of fasting RMR and EE after ingestion following the 2-week intervention (placebo treatment: open circles; catechin treatment: closed circles). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 26, repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant treatment effect (treatment effect, P = 0.008; time effect, P < 0.001; treatment x time, P = 0.584)
Forehead and skin temperature after the 2-week intervention
| Placebo treatment | Catechin treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forehead (proxy for core temperature) | |||
| Fasting (°C) | 36.66 ± 0.32 | 36.59 ± 0.29 | 0.114 |
| After ingestion (°C) | 36.80 ± 0.35 | 36.77 ± 0.34 | 0.384 |
| Changes in temp (°C) | 0.15 ± 0.16 | 0.17 ± 0.14 | 0.331 |
| Left subclavicular skin | |||
| Fasting (°C) | 34.61 ± 0.56 | 34.63 ± 0.52 | 0.713 |
| After ingestion (°C) | 34.70 ± 0.56 | 34.70 ± 0.50 | 0.996 |
| Changes in temp (°C) | 0.09 ± 0.31 | 0.06 ± 0.32 | 0.693 |
| Left foot sole skin | |||
| Fasting (°C) | 29.83 ± 2.27 | 29.94 ± 2.06 | 0.807 |
| After ingestion (°C) | 28.29 ± 1.50 | 28.23 ± 1.26 | 0.857 |
| Changes in temp (°C) | − 1.54 ± 1.17 | − 1.70 ± 1.20 | 0.388 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 26
Blood parameters after the 2-week intervention
| Placebo treatment | Catechin treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 86 ± 7 | 85 ± 7 | 0.256 |
| Insulin (μU/mL) | 3.3 ± 1.5 | 3.5 ± 1.7 | 0.552 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 191 ± 23 | 191 ± 24 | 0.975 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 110 ± 23 | 110 ± 25 | 1.000 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 59 ± 13 | 59 ± 13 | 1.000 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 93 ± 39 | 96 ± 44 | 0.632 |
| Free T3 (pg/mL) | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 0.658 |
| Free T4 (ng/dL) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.000 |
| TSH (μIU/mL) | 1.239 ± 0.730 | 1.249 ± 0.745 | 0.899 |
| Noradrenaline (ng/mL) | 0.32 ± 0.13 | 0.30 ± 0.09 | 0.206 |
| Cortisol (μg/dL) | 7.2 ± 1.9 | 7.1 ± 1.9 | 0.839 |
| Progesterone (ng/mL) | 4.9 ± 7.4 | 4.4 ± 6.8 | 0.819 |
| LH (mIU/mL) | 15.69 ± 16.36 | 16.47 ± 16.93 | 0.503 |
| FSH (mIU/mL) | 38.54 ± 38.94 | 40.89 ± 41.03 | 0.337 |
| Estradiol (pg/mL) | 61 ± 68 | 77 ± 94 | 0.387 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 26 [progesterone, LH, FSH and estradiol were measured in female subjects (n = 10)]
FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, T3 triiodothyronine, T4 thyroxine, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone