Literature DB >> 11831811

Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance.

Fan-Gang Zeng1, Ginger Grant, John Niparko, John Galvin, Robert Shannon, Jane Opie, Phil Segel.   

Abstract

This study examines optimal conversions of speech sounds to audible electric currents in cochlear-implant listeners. The speech dynamic range was measured for 20 consonants and 12 vowels spoken by five female and five male talkers. Even when the maximal root-mean-square (rms) level was normalized for all phoneme tokens, both broadband and narrow-band acoustic analyses showed an approximately 50-dB distribution of speech envelope levels. Phoneme recognition was also obtained in ten CLARION implant users as a function of the input dynamic range from 10 to 80 dB in 10-dB steps. Acoustic amplitudes within a specified input dynamic range were logarithmically mapped into the 10-20-dB range of electric stimulation typically found in cochlear-implant users. Consistent with acoustic data, the perceptual data showed that a 50-60-dB input dynamic range produced optimal speech recognition in these implant users. The present results indicate that speech dynamic range is much greater than the commonly assumed 30-dB range. A new amplitude mapping strategy, based on envelope distribution differences between consonants and vowels, is proposed to optimize acoustic-to-electric mapping of speech sounds. This new strategy will use a logarithmic map for low-frequency channels and a more compressive map for high-frequency channels, and may improve overall speech recognition for cochlear-implant users.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11831811     DOI: 10.1121/1.1423926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  49 in total

1.  Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Nicolas Guevara; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Marine Ardoint; Sonia Saaï; Michel Hoen; Dan Gnansia; Philippe Romanet; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Temporal masking in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Hongbin Chen; Shilong Han
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

Review 5.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

6.  The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Robert P Morse; Peter F Morse; Terry B Nunn; Karen A M Archer; Patrick Boyle
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-12

Review 7.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

8.  Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Baudhuin; Jamie Cadieux; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Jerrica L Maxson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 9.  How we do it: employment of listening-development criteria during assessment of infants who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  Brittan A Barker; Maura H Kenworthy; Elizabeth A Walker
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-02

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.