Nikolay Kornienko1,2, Khoa H Ly1,3, William E Robinson1,4, Nina Heidary1,2, Jenny Z Zhang1, Erwin Reisner1. 1. Department of Chemistry , University of Cambridge , Lensfield Road , Cambridge CB2 1EW , U.K. 2. Department of Chemistry , Université de Montréal , Roger-Gaudry Building , Montreal , Quebec H3C 3J7 , Canada. 3. Fakultät für Chemie und Lebensmittelchemie , Technische Universität Dresden , 01062 Dresden , Germany. 4. Institute for Molecules and Materials , Radboud University , Heyendaalseweg 135 , 6525 AJ Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Abstract
Enzymes are the essential catalytic components of biology and adsorbing redox-active enzymes on electrode surfaces enables the direct probing of their function. Through standard electrochemical measurements, catalytic activity, reversibility and stability, potentials of redox-active cofactors, and interfacial electron transfer rates can be readily measured. Mechanistic investigations on the high electrocatalytic rates and selectivity of enzymes may yield inspiration for the design of synthetic molecular and heterogeneous electrocatalysts. Electrochemical investigations of enzymes also aid in our understanding of their activity within their biological environment and why they evolved in their present structure and function. However, the conventional array of electrochemical techniques (e.g., voltammetry and chronoamperometry) alone offers a limited picture of the enzyme-electrode interface. How many enzymes are loaded onto an electrode? In which orientation(s) are they bound? What fraction is active, and are single or multilayers formed? Does this static picture change over time, applied voltage, or chemical environment? How does charge transfer through various intraprotein cofactors contribute to the overall performance and catalytic bias? What is the distribution of individual enzyme activities within an ensemble of active protein films? These are central questions for the understanding of the enzyme-electrode interface, and a multidisciplinary approach is required to deliver insightful answers. Complementing standard electrochemical experiments with an orthogonal set of techniques has recently allowed to provide a more complete picture of enzyme-electrode systems. Within this framework, we first discuss a brief history of achievements and challenges in enzyme electrochemistry. We subsequently describe how the aforementioned challenges can be overcome by applying advanced electrochemical techniques, quartz-crystal microbalance measurements, and spectroscopic, namely, resonance Raman and infrared, analysis. For example, rotating ring disk electrochemistry permits the simultaneous determination of reaction kinetics and quantification of generated products. In addition, recording changes in frequency and dissipation in a quartz crystal microbalance allows to shed light into enzyme loading, relative orientation, clustering, and denaturation at the electrode surface. Resonance Raman spectroscopy yields information on ligation and redox state of enzyme cofactors, whereas infrared spectroscopy provides insights into active site states and the protein secondary and tertiary structure. The development of these emerging methods for the analysis of the enzyme-electrode interface is the primary focus of this Account. We also take a critical look at the remaining gaps in our understanding and challenges lying ahead toward attaining a complete mechanistic picture of the enzyme-electrode interface.
Enzymes are the essential catalytic components of biology and adsorbing redox-active enzymes on electrode surfaces enables the direct probing of their function. Through standard electrochemical measurements, catalytic activity, reversibility and stability, potentials of redox-active cofactors, and interfacial electron transfer rates can be readily measured. Mechanistic investigations on the high electrocatalytic rates and selectivity of enzymes may yield inspiration for the design of synthetic molecular and heterogeneous electrocatalysts. Electrochemical investigations of enzymes also aid in our understanding of their activity within their biological environment and why they evolved in their present structure and function. However, the conventional array of electrochemical techniques (e.g., voltammetry and chronoamperometry) alone offers a limited picture of the enzyme-electrode interface. How many enzymes are loaded onto an electrode? In which orientation(s) are they bound? What fraction is active, and are single or multilayers formed? Does this static picture change over time, applied voltage, or chemical environment? How does charge transfer through various intraprotein cofactors contribute to the overall performance and catalytic bias? What is the distribution of individual enzyme activities within an ensemble of active protein films? These are central questions for the understanding of the enzyme-electrode interface, and a multidisciplinary approach is required to deliver insightful answers. Complementing standard electrochemical experiments with an orthogonal set of techniques has recently allowed to provide a more complete picture of enzyme-electrode systems. Within this framework, we first discuss a brief history of achievements and challenges in enzyme electrochemistry. We subsequently describe how the aforementioned challenges can be overcome by applying advanced electrochemical techniques, quartz-crystal microbalance measurements, and spectroscopic, namely, resonance Raman and infrared, analysis. For example, rotating ring disk electrochemistry permits the simultaneous determination of reaction kinetics and quantification of generated products. In addition, recording changes in frequency and dissipation in a quartz crystal microbalance allows to shed light into enzyme loading, relative orientation, clustering, and denaturation at the electrode surface. Resonance Raman spectroscopy yields information on ligation and redox state of enzyme cofactors, whereas infrared spectroscopy provides insights into active site states and the protein secondary and tertiary structure. The development of these emerging methods for the analysis of the enzyme-electrode interface is the primary focus of this Account. We also take a critical look at the remaining gaps in our understanding and challenges lying ahead toward attaining a complete mechanistic picture of the enzyme-electrode interface.
The study of enzymes enhances our knowledge
of catalysis and biology
while leading to applications in medicine, sensing, energy, and more.
To this end, the electrochemistry of protein-modified electrodes known
as protein film electrochemistry (PFE) has served as a powerful tool
for probing the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of redox-active
proteins and enzymes since the second half of the 20th century.[1−3] The topic is mature, and several excellent reviews have been published
describing the information available from immobilized enzymes and
routine PFE experiments.[4−7] The unique insights provided by PFE are largely enabled
by direct interfacial electron transfer between the electrode surface
and the enzyme cofactors, including its active site. The catalytic
rates often exceed those accessible by intermolecular electron transfer
with traditional solution phase mediators (limited by their diffusion)
as many enzymes display very fast intrinsic turnover rates. As a result, quantification of enzyme kinetics can be
limited in solution assays and capturing the rapid active site reactivity
by PFE can allow for unravelling of the active site’s intrinsic
thermodynamic and kinetic properties.PFE provides direct, real-time
information on transient and steady-state
catalytic behavior using a minuscule amount of electroactive enzyme
(Figure a,b). The
effect of changing the electrode potential, substrate or inhibitor
concentration, pH value, and atmospheric composition can therefore
be probed with relative ease within a single experiment. The readout
from PFE experiments (typically voltammetry and chronoamperometry)
is usually current, which can be readily analyzed as it directly relates
to stoichiometric cofactor oxidation/reduction or catalytic rate.
Furthermore, these conditions can exceed those available to traditional
solution assays: the continuum of electrode potentials exceeds the
limited reduction potential ranges of solution phase electron donors
and acceptors, and the electrode potential can readily be modified in situ to gauge reaction kinetics. PFE has allowed a variety
of potential-dependent effects to be observed such as catalytic bias,[8] cooperative two-electron transfer,[9] oxidation state dependent inhibitor binding,[10] and anaerobic oxidative inactivation.[11]
Figure 1
Protein film electrochemistry. (a) Schematic representation
of
the electron transfer between an electrode surface and the enzyme
active site, which catalyzes interconversion between oxidized and
reduced substrates (given example is a hydrogenase). (b) Simulated
voltammetry showing the enzyme’s redox couple under non-turnover
conditions and catalytic voltammetry under turnover conditions.
Protein film electrochemistry. (a) Schematic representation
of
the electron transfer between an electrode surface and the enzyme
active site, which catalyzes interconversion between oxidized and
reduced substrates (given example is a hydrogenase). (b) Simulated
voltammetry showing the enzyme’s redox couple under non-turnover
conditions and catalytic voltammetry under turnover conditions.Theoretical descriptions of catalytic
waveshapes[12,13] have arisen with the development
of PFE, highlighting both its strengths
and weaknesses. The reproducible, facile, and precise measurements
of PFE provide an ideal platform for modeling. A wealth of data can
readily be generated as a function of electrode potential, potential
scan rate, substrate concentration, and pH value to inform and test
modeling approaches.Despite its advantages, PFE does not provide
a fully comprehensive
picture of the enzyme–electrode interface. However, it can
be coupled to a variety of complementary techniques to quantify aspects
such as enzyme adsorption, product generation, and cofactor states
and answer the questions posed in the conspectus. The application
of these techniques is summarized in this Account.
Limitations
of Protein Film Electrochemistry
First, reliable quantification
of active enzyme surface coverage
is often a challenge, which can lead to significant uncertainty in
the turnover rates of immobilized enzymes. Some examples exist of
non-catalytic turnover voltammetry (of inhibited enzymes or in the
absence of substrate) allowing the quantification of electroactive
enzymes on the electrode surface.[9] However,
non-turnover signals are not always possible to observe due to low
enzyme surface coverage and significant capacitive currents (especially
when employing structured electrode geometries). Potential-step voltammetry,
Fourier-transform voltammetry, and other related techniques may aid
in increasing sensitivity to this end.[14,15] Product detection
is challenging when using small enzyme quantities in PFE experiments
and is therefore not routinely performed.Although a theoretical
model has been proposed,[13] a comprehensive
understanding of electron transfer through
multiple electron transfer relays within an enzyme has yet to be completely
elucidated experimentally. There is also a lack of information on
the surface interactions, orientations, and structures of enzymes
on electrode surfaces.[16] The dispersion
of enzymes resulting from different enzyme orientations and a distribution
of distances of the enzyme’s surface electron relay to the
electrode surface makes analytical interpretations challenging.[17,18] Precious metals such as gold and graphite electrodes are most commonly
used and best understood, but there is much scope for electrode design
with alternative materials such as porous carbon-based systems and
metal oxides.[16,19,20] Within this context, a poor enzyme–electrode interface is
often the reason when an electrochemical signal is not observed in
PFE and new electrode materials and 3D architectures may improve the
interactions.
Protein Film Photo-electrochemistry
PFE was initially applied to enzymes catalyzing “dark”
reactions. Coupling illumination to the standard PFE apparatus, protein-film
photo-electrochemistry (PF-PEC) applies the fundamental concepts and
resulting insights of PFE to (i) photoactive enzymes wired to an electrode
surface (Figure a,b),[21] (ii) electroactive enzymes wired to dye-sensitized
or semiconductor electrodes,[22] or (iii)
photoactive enzymes wired to sensitized or semiconductor electrodes.[23] In the latter two cases, the semiconductor (or
dye) provides energized charge carriers (electrons or holes) to drive
the enzymatic reaction. In the case of photosystem II (PSII) as an
example for the former case, electrons are extracted from water at
the Mn4Ca active site and transferred through the electron
transport chain to the electrode, resulting in anodic currents under
illumination (Figure a–c).
Figure 2
Protein
film photo-electrochemistry. (a,b) PSII absorbs light to
carry out water oxidation at its [Mn4Ca] active site and
transfers electrons through the electron transfer chain. (c) Photoanodic
currents of PSII-electrodes during chronoamperometry under representative
dark–light cycles.
Uniquely, studying light-driven reactions in this
context can serve
as inspiration for artificial photosynthesis.[24] Key considerations for the semiconductor are the energy levels,
charge transfer kinetics, wavelength-dependent absorption coefficient,
and surface biocompatibility. To avoid rate limitations from light
irradiation, the energy of photons must be equal to or greater than
the energy gap of the HOMO and LUMO within the photosensitizer (or
band gap in a semiconductor), and the photon-driven electron flux
should surpass the rate of the slowest step in the catalytic cycle.
Transparent conductive oxide electrode substrates are typically employed
to minimize parasitic light absorption.In systems featuring
multiple light-absorbing components such as
the water oxidation enzyme PSII and a dye, dual-wavelength action
spectra can be used to probe how well each component functions within
the entire system.[23] Electrode design considerations
also become important to maximize light absorption, particularly in
highly structured mesoporous and inverse opal electrodes.[25] Therefore, chromophore-containing enzyme distribution
and penetration into the depth of porous electrodes can be quantified
with confocal fluorescence microscopy.[26]Protein
film photo-electrochemistry. (a,b) PSII absorbs light to
carry out water oxidation at its [Mn4Ca] active site and
transfers electrons through the electron transfer chain. (c) Photoanodic
currents of PSII-electrodes during chronoamperometry under representative
dark–light cycles.
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
While a wealth of
information can be extracted from the standard
array of voltammetric and chronoamperometric techniques in probing
the enzyme–electrode interface, the data are limited to the
net current flow. Extending the scope of electrochemical analysis
is often needed to provide critical details regarding the deconvolution
of charge transfer across various interfaces and through cofactors,
precise kinetics of chemical catalysis, interfacial capacitance, and
effects of substrate diffusion. Thus, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
(EIS) has been applied to enzymatic systems.[27]EIS functions by applying an alternating current (AC) voltage
with
small perturbation (∼10 mV) at a given potential and recording
the impedance. The resultant data is then modeled and fit to an equivalent
circuit. Because of the complexity of the enzyme–electrode
interface that often features several points of charge and mass transfer,
multiple resistive, capacitive, and inductive elements may be present.
Extracting quantitative information from EIS data that corresponds
to physical processes is reliant on accurately capturing each of these
elements in the construction of an equivalent circuit to fit the experimental
data. Hence, the data interpretation is not completely unambiguous.EIS can be used to detect formation of multienzyme assemblies through
recording changes in electron transfer under catalytic turnover,[28] analyzing reaction kinetics,[29] and extracting enzymatic rate constants by plotting charge
transfer resistance versus substrate concentration.[30] Recently, an EIS study of a hydrogenase (H2ase)
[enzyme catalyzing the reversible reduction of protons to H2] revealed that the charge transfer resistance through the FeS clusters
is lower at voltages more negative than the reversible hydrogen electrode
(RHE),[31] which could be due to chemical
effects or possible changes in orientation. Consequently, this was
interpreted to result in a catalytic bias toward H2 evolution
as opposed to H2 oxidation. Charge transfer resistance
from chemical catalysis at the active site was found not to be limiting
for oxidation currents as a similar H2ase natively lacking
the FeS clusters (electrons transferred directly to the active site)
did not feature a catalytic bias for H2 evolution and possessed
a similar EIS-derived charge transfer resistance in each direction.
Rotating Ring Disk Electrochemistry
Product detection with
PFE is notoriously difficult due to the
use of tiny amounts of protein and the small amount of product being
distributed in the bulk electrolyte solution. To this end, an instrumental
approach applied to probe reaction mechanisms and products of immobilized
enzymes is the use of a rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE). Here,
two working electrodes are employed: an enzyme-loaded disk electrode
and usually a Pt ring electrode. The apparatus is rotated to generate
a well-defined hydrodynamic convective flow to first transfer reactants
from the bulk solution to the central disk, and then, along with any
products formed, to the outer ring electrode. By oxidizing or reducing
substrates at the disk, one can gather insights about the occurring
chemistry. Reaction products can be detected via their reduction or
oxidation at the ring, providing insight into competing reaction mechanisms.However, the ring is not selective for any one reaction and will
perform all favorable reactions. Hence, the potential is set where
only one possible reaction can be carried out. As an example of RRDE
application, H2O2, originating from the reduction
of O2 by glucose oxidase, was detected by selectively oxidizing
H2O2 at the ring electrode.[3] Recently, the RRDE technique was coupled with PF-PEC to
study the oxygenic photoreactivity of PSII (Figure a,b).[32] O2 was detected from the well-established light-driven water
oxidation reaction by its reduction at the ring. Interestingly, products
from reduction reactions of O2 at a more negative applied
potential were found to be primarily H2O2, indicated
by catalase-induced suppression of ring currents.
Figure 3
Rotating ring disk electrochemistry.
(a) RRDE provides a controlled
flux of substrates from the bulk solution to the disk and for the
formed products to the ring electrode. (b) Illumination of PSII at
a positive potential results in photoanodic disk currents from light-driven
water oxidation and cathodic ring currents stemming from oxygen reduction.
Rotating ring disk electrochemistry.
(a) RRDE provides a controlled
flux of substrates from the bulk solution to the disk and for the
formed products to the ring electrode. (b) Illumination of PSII at
a positive potential results in photoanodic disk currents from light-driven
water oxidation and cathodic ring currents stemming from oxygen reduction.
Microelectrode-Based Techniques
Scanning electrochemical current microscopy (SECM), electrochemical
scanning tunneling microscopy (EC-STM), and related techniques have
been useful in analyzing activities of enzyme assemblies and even
single enzymes. Deconvoluting single enzyme activities from the ensemble
average is important in elucidating the catalytic activity of enzymes
in discrete functional states, orientations or different levels of
integrity. With SECM/EC-STM, the enzyme-loaded substrate is the primary
working electrode, while a cantilever or fine tip functions as a secondary
working electrode, both connected to a bipotentiostat (Figure a,b).[33] The secondary electrode acts to reduce or oxidize any reaction products
formed in its vicinity or to image surface-bound enzymes. In the context
of PFE, EC-STM has been used to measure potential-dependent turnover
frequencies of H2ase by correlating EC-STM-derived enzyme-surface
coverage with voltammetry.[34] On a self-assembled
monolayer (SAM)-functionalized Au surface, a TOF of ∼1000 s–1 was observed and was extrapolated to 21 000
if the enzyme were in direct contact with the Au without the interfacial
SAM spacer.[34]
Figure 4
Scanning electrochemical
current microscopy. (a) SECM configuration
with the secondary working electrode detecting locally produced reaction
products. (b) Principle to study activities of individual enzymes
or clusters of enzymes by SECM (H2ase shown as example).
Scanning electrochemical
current microscopy. (a) SECM configuration
with the secondary working electrode detecting locally produced reaction
products. (b) Principle to study activities of individual enzymes
or clusters of enzymes by SECM (H2ase shown as example).In SECM, a microelectrode directly
oxidizes or reduces the product
of an enzymatic reaction. A large challenge yet to be overcome is
extrapolating this down to a single enzyme level, though it has already
been achieved with single nanoparticle catalysts.[35] For example, an SECM-measured H2 oxidation current
will drop when the tip is positioned over an inactive enzyme or bare
substrate. Conversely, the current will significantly increase when
the tip is positioned over an active enzyme due to the increased H2 supply (Figure b). Alternatively, single-enzyme activity can be potentially quantified
through temporary contact (and consequently, catalytic current generated)
from a diffusing enzyme to a microelectrode.[35,36] As with most miniaturized techniques, detecting low signals is a
challenge and impedes unambiguous quantification of single enzyme
activity.
Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation
Quartz
crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) is an invaluable
tool toward understanding enzyme binding on electrode surfaces and
can be operated in parallel to electrochemical analysis. Briefly,
the QCM-D instrument operates by measuring the resonance frequency
of a piezoelectric quartz chip upon the application of a voltage.
The frequency is typically proportional to the mass on the electrode
in accordance with the Sauerbrey equation (assuming a rigid thin film).[37] Enzyme adsorption onto a coated quartz electrode
is readily measured in a flow cell, illustrated in Figure a, from a frequency decrease
upon the introduction of enzymes into the flowing solution. This was
used for quantifying enhanced enzyme accommodating capacities of planar,
high surface area mesoporous, and inverse opal metal–oxide
electrode architectures for H2ase and formate dehydrogenase
(FDH) [enzyme catalyzing the oxidation of formate to CO2].[22,38] If the enzyme specific activity is known
or can be electrochemically determined, comparing the enzyme loading
as measured with QCM-D to the enzyme activity can elucidate the proportion
of active enzymes oriented for direct electron transfer to or from
the electrode.[39]
Figure 5
Quartz crystal microbalance
with dissipation. (a) Typical setup
of a QCM-D flow cell. Complementary spectroscopic and electrochemical
analysis can be simultaneously coupled in the system. (b) Quantity
of adsorbed enzyme and rigidity of binding is measured through changes
in frequency and dissipation, respectively. (c) QCM-D measurements provide information about coverage as well as multilayer
formation.
Quartz crystal microbalance
with dissipation. (a) Typical setup
of a QCM-D flow cell. Complementary spectroscopic and electrochemical
analysis can be simultaneously coupled in the system. (b) Quantity
of adsorbed enzyme and rigidity of binding is measured through changes
in frequency and dissipation, respectively. (c) QCM-D measurements provide information about coverage as well as multilayer
formation.Furthermore, the dissipation,
a measure of how quickly the quartz
oscillation decays following perturbation, reflects both the mass
and its viscoelasticity (rigidity) on the electrode surface (Figure b). Cross-comparing
changes in frequency and dissipation can indicate the rigidity of
enzyme binding, enzyme-assembly formation, enzyme desorption, denaturation,
reorientation, and conformational changes (Figure c).[40] A notable
work deconvoluted mass loss (changes in frequency) and non-desorptive
structural changes (changes in dissipation) to electrocatalytic performance
decays of O2-reducing bilirubin oxidase.[41] It was concluded that the primary mechanism of activity
loss in the system was likely due to effects such as enzyme dehydration
or denaturation as opposed to enzyme desorption. There remains some
uncertainty in interpreting changes in dissipation and directly linking
to the enzyme at a molecular level.To expand the scope of QCM-D,
the use of a transparent window integrated
into a QCM cell enables simultaneous photochemical and spectroscopic
measurements to be carried out. First applied to understand electrocatalysts,[42] probing the activity of adsorbed photosystems
is now an intriguing possibility. Moreover, coupling spectroscopy
with QCM-D can reveal how the redox state of cofactors changes as
a function of enzyme conformation, loading density, assembly formation,
and catalytic activity.
UV–Vis Absorption Spectroscopy
Many metalloenzymes possess chromophoric active sites (or other
cofactors) that absorb in the visible spectrum. UV–vis spectroscopy
has therefore emerged as a simple method to characterize the active
sites for determining enzyme loading via the Lambert–Beer relationship.[43,44] Heme-containing proteins immobilized on transparent, conductive,
and 3D-structured metal oxide electrodes have been studied using UV–vis
spectro-electrochemistry in transmission mode (Figure a). The redox activity of microperoxidase
immobilized in a mesoporous ITO electrode was monitored to optimize
enzyme loading,[45] and time-resolved UV–vis
spectro-electrochemistry showed that the reduction of the Fe occurred
within 50 ms, supporting good electronic contact with the enzyme.
The isolated electron conduit decaheme protein MtrC was also adsorbed
on mesoporous ITO electrodes and monitored using UV–vis spectro-electrochemistry
to determine the redox potentials of the heme cofactors by recording
changes in their oxidation state-dependent absorption.[46,47]
Figure 6
Spectro-electrochemistry
for investigation of immobilized enzymes.
(a) UV–vis spectro-electrochemistry measured in transmission
mode. The enzyme is loaded on transparent 3D-nanostructured metal
oxide electrodes. (b) Resonance Raman spectro-electrochemistry measured
in confocal mode. The exciting laser line is tuned to match the cofactor
absorption band yielding selectively strongly enhanced resonance Raman
spectra of the cofactor unit. For both techniques, applying potentials
allows for monitoring changes in redox states of the enzyme cofactor(s).
Spectro-electrochemistry
for investigation of immobilized enzymes.
(a) UV–vis spectro-electrochemistry measured in transmission
mode. The enzyme is loaded on transparent 3D-nanostructured metaloxide electrodes. (b) Resonance Raman spectro-electrochemistry measured
in confocal mode. The exciting laser line is tuned to match the cofactor
absorption band yielding selectively strongly enhanced resonance Raman
spectra of the cofactor unit. For both techniques, applying potentials
allows for monitoring changes in redox states of the enzyme cofactor(s).
Confocal Resonance Raman
Spectroscopy
Resonance Raman (RR) spectroscopy has been utilized
to investigate
structure–function relationships of cofactors of various enzymes.[48] The strength of RR spectroscopy is its ability
to selectively provide signals from the chromophore unit of interest
by tuning the exciting laser line to match the chromophore’s
absorption. RR spectroscopy therefore largely neglects the otherwise
interfering protein matrix and can provide signal enhancements of
up to several orders of magnitude. In contrast to UV–vis spectroscopy,
it can inherently reveal a higher depth of information by probing
molecule specific vibrational modes. Optimal conditions for RR spectroscopy
involve a combination of a strong electronic transition in the enzyme
and a high electrode surface area maximizing sample concentration
within the focused laser spot (Figure b). For example, RR spectro-electrochemistry was used
to study adsorption and redox behavior of cytochrome c (cytc) on mesoporous ITO electrodes.[49] From the unique RR signals of the ferric and
ferrous cytc species, the apparent redox potential
of the immobilized enzyme was calculated. Furthermore, RR spectro-electrochemical
studies on MtrC adsorbed on mesoporous ITO electrodes revealed crucial
insights into the origin of its recently discovered peroxidase activity.[46] A transition from a six-coordinated to a five-coordinated
heme in the ferrous state in some hemes was observed. These heme groups
exhibited a potentially weaker ligation that allowed for effective
H2O2 binding and catalysis. In all, this technique
helps to provide a molecular basis for the activity measured by PFE.
Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy
Fourier-transform infrared
(FTIR) absorption spectroscopy is a
powerful tool to study the enzymes’ secondary and tertiary
structures, as well as their active sites.[50] The IR vibrational spectrum contains a wealth of information about
structure and environment of amino acid side chains, as well as protein
conformation and the polypeptide backbone. To enable in situ IR study of enzymes adsorbed on electrodes, the method is usually
carried out in attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode.[51] The electrode is thereby deposited on an IR
active waveguide typically made of Si or Ge, and the IR light is coupled
in from below (Figure a). At the interface, the IR beam is reflected, giving rise to an
evanescent wave (penetrating approximately 500 nm, depending on the
apparatus, into the electrode structure) that probes surface-bound
enzymes. This configuration offers the advantage of avoiding the interfering
total absorption of water and readily enables electrochemical control
by coating the waveguide with a conductive layer. Moreover, operation
in difference mode allows for detection of very small changes at the
protein backbone, amino acid side chains, or cofactors (Figure b,c).[52]
Figure 7
Fourier
transform infrared absorption spectro-electrochemistry
in attenuated total reflection mode. (a) Enzymes are loaded onto a
3D-nanostructured electrode deposited on an IR waveguide (typically
a Si or Ge prism). The IR beam is reflected at the interface giving
rise to an evanescent IR wave. (b) IR signatures of cofactors can
be obtained and are usually plotted in second derivative mode due
to intrinsically low signal intensities. (c) The highly intense amide
bands in the region from around 1550 to 1650 cm–1 contains information on the secondary and tertiary structure of
the immobilized enzyme.
Fourier
transform infrared absorption spectro-electrochemistry
in attenuated total reflection mode. (a) Enzymes are loaded onto a
3D-nanostructured electrode deposited on an IR waveguide (typically
a Si or Ge prism). The IR beam is reflected at the interface giving
rise to an evanescent IR wave. (b) IR signatures of cofactors can
be obtained and are usually plotted in second derivative mode due
to intrinsically low signal intensities. (c) The highly intense amide
bands in the region from around 1550 to 1650 cm–1 contains information on the secondary and tertiary structure of
the immobilized enzyme.ATR-FTIR spectro-electrochemistry has been used to study
immobilized
[NiFe] H2ases on a 3D-structured electrode consisting of
highly conductive carbon particles embedded in a phosphate buffered
Nafion network.[53] The electrode was designed
to chemically resemble graphite electrodes that are commonly employed
in PFE to enable a direct comparison of voltammetric and spectroscopic
data. The employed experimental configuration enabled IR detection
of the NiFe active site. The observed unique IR bands from 1900 to
2110 cm–1 reflect the CN– and
CO ligands attached to the Femetal atom that are sensitive to electron
density changes at the metal center(s). Studies using a [NiFe] H2ase also demonstrated electrochemically induced oxidation
state changes at the active site of the enzyme in the immobilized
state.[54] In another line of investigation,
the spectroscopic signatures of the active site of an oxygen-sensitive
[NiFe] H2ase were monitored to demonstrate the protection
from damage at high potentials conferred to the enzyme by a surrounding
viologen-modified redox hydrogel.[55] The
electrode modification with redox-active hydrogels enabled the recording
of the measurement in transmission mode in an optically transparent
thin layer electrochemical cell, which is usually employed in solution
studies.Beyond active sites, the strongest features in ATR-FTIR
spectra
of enzymes are typically the amide bands (e.g., amide I at around
1650 cm–1 and amide II at around 1550 cm–1) that arise from the amide bonds in the polypeptide backbone and
sensitively encode the enzyme’s secondary structure.[50] In this respect, a maintained amide I and amide
II pattern in the ATR-FTIR spectra supports a largely conserved enzyme
structure upon adsorption.[56] The intensity
of the amide bands has been used to study the immobilization and infiltration
process of H2ase, PSII, and FDH throughout a 3D-structured
metal oxide electrode.[22,26,38] By following the H2ase’s amide band intensities
during the incubation process, it was found that hierarchical inverse
opal TiO2 electrodes allowed for full penetration of enzymes
into the macrostructure, whereas mesoporous TiO2 led to
an accumulation of proteins only at the top layers. ATR-FTIR spectroscopic
studies on FDH immobilized on a planar TiO2 surface gave
insights into the nature of the binding between enzyme and metal oxide
surface, revealing that the interaction is stronger than purely electrostatic.[38]Another relevant technique is polarization
modulated infrared reflection
absorption spectroscopy (PMIRRAS), which is well-suited for studying
particularly the enzyme orientation on electrode surfaces. The polarized
IR light is detected in reflection from the top on mirror metal surfaces
thus impeding in situ applications of this method,
that is, in aqueous conditions under potential control. Nevertheless,
important information was derived using this highly surface-sensitive
technique. For example, the orientations of a laccase[57,58] and a [NiFe] H2ase[56] on SAM-coated
Au electrodes could be studied via the analysis of the amide I/II
intensity ratio when adsorbed on differently charged SAMs.[58] The enzyme orientation could then be directly
linked to the overall activity of the biomodified electrode. In addition,
surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and ellipsometry have been
shown to complement PMIRRAS for determination of enzyme loading and
biofilm thickness.[58]
Surface-Enhanced
Vibrational Spectroscopy
Arising from locally elevated electromagnetic
fields at the surfaces
of certain metals, the high sensitivity of surface-enhanced (resonance)
Raman (SE(R)R) (Figure a) and surface-enhanced IR absorption (SEIRA) (Figure b) spectroscopy make these techniques ideal
for studying enzyme–electrode interactions. However, the requirement
of surface-enhanced activity of the supporting substrate largely limits
the application of SE(R)R and SEIRA spectroscopy to nanostructured
Ag and Au electrodes.[59] Due to the fast
drop of the enhancement effect with distance from the electrode, SE(R)R
and SEIRA spectroscopy effectively probe only the first few nanometers
at the interface, rendering this technique exceptionally surface-sensitive.
Figure 8
Surface-enhanced
vibrational spectroscopy. (a) Surface-enhanced
(resonance) Raman and (b) IR absorption spectro-electrochemistry on
SAM-coated Ag and Au electrodes, respectively.
Surface-enhanced
vibrational spectroscopy. (a) Surface-enhanced
(resonance) Raman and (b) IR absorption spectro-electrochemistry on
SAM-coated Ag and Au electrodes, respectively.SERR spectroscopy has been extensively employed to investigate
a range of immobilized proteins, with heme-containing proteins being
the most studied.[59] For measurements, a
laser line matching the electronic transition of the heme and concomitantly
exciting the surface plasmons of a nanostructured Ag support is utilized.
Stationary and time-resolved potential-controlled SERR spectroscopy
have been applied to study the interfacial electron transfer of cytc,[60] the communication between
the heme cofactors in cytochrome c oxidase,[61] the heme cofactor of immobilized cytochrome
P450,[62] the interaction between cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductase and its physiological partner
cytochrome c552 on an electrode surface,[63] and the active site of a heme peroxidase[64] at biomimetically coated rough Ag electrodes.
SERR spectroscopic investigations of the non-heme DNA-repairing enzyme
endonuclease III revealed redox activity of the [4Fe–4S] cluster
also in the absence of DNA-binding.[65] Also,
electron transfer from the electrode to a membrane-bound [NiFe] H2ase heterotrimer was demonstrated to predominantly occur through
the enzyme’s HoxGK subunit rather than the terminal HoxZ subunit
on the basis of the SERR-derived reduction rate of the heme b cofactors in HoxZ.[66] Important
to these studies is that SERR spectroscopy allows for selectively
monitoring of protein cofactors even at very low surface coverages.In the absence of a resonance Raman effect, SER spectroscopy is
also useful. For example, SER studies on a laccase immobilized on
Au nanoparticle decorated electrodes revealed that the enzyme binds
via the T2/T3 Cu site instead of the T1 Cu site.[67] Moreover, increasing SER bands assigned to COO– and CH2 groups indicated also a change in orientation
of the enzyme with increasing positive potentials. Beyond nanostructured
Au and Ag electrodes, surface-enhancement can be exploited from metal
oxides, which are typically more biocompatible than metals. Recently,
periodic metal oxide nanostructures gave rise to strongly increased
Raman signals.[68] Particularly, the enhancement
enabled detection of a cytochrome b unit, which was
found to maintain its secondary structure and redox properties upon
binding to a TiO2 nanotube electrode surface.Analogous
to ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, SEIRA spectroscopy has been
used to study an immobilized H2ase on SAM-coated Au electrodes
(Figure b).[69] The results indicated that the enzyme conserved
its structure upon adsorption and was in excellent electronic contact
to the electrode. Moreover, a recent SEIRA study supported by molecular
dynamics simulations and electrocatalytic measurements showed that
the immobilization complex of a [NiFe] H2ase and the coated
electrode can control the enzyme’s electrocatalytic performance.[70] In some of the occupied orientations, which
varied depending on the charge of the electrode coating, no direct
electronic contact with the electrode was possible and the use of
redox mediators was required. Moreover, the orientation of a nitric
oxide reductase on a SAM-coated Au electrode has been determined by
SEIRA spectroscopy.[71] By exploiting the
high affinity of carbon monoxide to FeII and following
the potential-dependent intensity of the ν(CO) modes, the formal
potentials of the binuclear Fe reaction center could be determined.
Aside from probing orientations, SEIRA spectroscopy has been applied
to monitor formation of a hybrid complex of PSI and a H2ase utilized toward photochemical H2 generation.[72]
Concluding Remarks
PFE has been
established as a powerful tool in enzymology, but
complementary electrochemical techniques are required to more completely
understand the enzyme–material interface and catalytic performance
of immobilized enzymes. Quantifying enzyme adsorption, inter- and
intraprotein electron transfer, activity and orientation distributions,
and product generation are significant challenges. To this end, we
discussed several emerging methods that facilitate these investigations
and provide new insights into the aforementioned parameters to answer
the questions posed in the conspectus. The combination of this suite
of techniques allows probing the enzyme–electrode interface
in depth and is instrumental in accelerating the development of bioelectrochemical
systems such as enzymatic sensors, biofuel cells, and semiartificial
photosynthetic devices, as well as enhancing our fundamental knowledge
of biology.
Authors: Alois Bonifacio; Diego Millo; Peter H J Keizers; Roald Boegschoten; Jan N M Commandeur; Nico P E Vermeulen; Cees Gooijer; Gert van der Zwan Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Vivek M Badiani; Samuel J Cobb; Andreas Wagner; Ana Rita Oliveira; Sónia Zacarias; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner Journal: ACS Catal Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 13.700