Literature DB >> 12465985

Electrical contacting of flavoenzymes and NAD(P)+-dependent enzymes by reconstitution and affinity interactions on phenylboronic acid monolayers associated with Au-electrodes.

Maya Zayats1, Eugenii Katz, Itamar Willner.   

Abstract

The preparation of integrated, electrically contacted, flavoenzyme and NAD(P)(+)-dependent enzyme-electrodes is described. The reconstitution of apo-glucose oxidase, apo-GOx, on a FAD cofactor linked to a pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) phenylboronic acid monolayer yields an electrically contacted enzyme monolayer (surface coverage 2.1 x 10(-)(12) mol cm(-)(2)) exhibiting a turnover rate of 700 s(-)(1) (at 22 +/- 2 degrees C). The system is characterized by microgravimetric quartz-crystal microbalance analyses, Faradaic impedance spectroscopy, rotating disk electrode experiments, and cyclic voltammetry. The performance of the enzyme-electrode for glucose sensing is described. Similarly, the electrically contacted enzyme-electrodes of NAD(P)(+)-dependent enzymes malate dehydrogenase, MalD, and lactate dehydrogenase, LDH, are prepared by the cross-linking of affinity complexes generated between the enzymes and the NADP(+) and NAD(+) cofactors linked to a pyrroloquinoline quinone phenylboronic acid monolayer, respectively. The MalD enzyme-electrode (surface coverage 1.2 x 10(-)(12) mol cm(-)(2)) exhibits a turnover rate of 190 s(-)(1), whereas the LDH enzyme-electrode (surface coverage 7.0 x 10(-)(12) mol cm(-)(2)) reveals a turnover rate of 2.5 s(-)(1). Chronoamperometric experiments reveal that the NAD(+) cofactor is linked to the PQQ-phenylboronic acid by two different binding modes. The integration of the LDH with the two NAD(+) cofactor configurations yields enzyme assemblies differing by 1 order of magnitude in their bioelectrocatalytic activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12465985     DOI: 10.1021/ja027919y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  8 in total

1.  Multivalent interaction-based carbohydrate biosensors for signal amplification.

Authors:  Yanyan Wang; Srinivas Chalagalla; Tiehai Li; Xue-Long Sun; Wei Zhao; Peng G Wang; Xiangqun Zeng
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 10.618

2.  Immobilization of enzymes to silver island films for enhanced enzymatic activity.

Authors:  Biebele Abel; Kadir Aslan
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 8.128

3.  Magnetic particle-based hybrid platforms for bioanalytical sensors.

Authors:  Lia Stanciu; Yu-Ho Won; Mallikarjunarao Ganesana; Silvana Andreescu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Electrochemical glucose sensors--developments using electrostatic assembly and carbon nanotubes for biosensor construction.

Authors:  Alice Harper; Mark R Anderson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Redox Response of Reduced Graphene Oxide-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrodes to Hydrogen Peroxide and Hydrazine.

Authors:  Shigehiro Takahashi; Naoyuki Abiko; Jun-Ichi Anzai
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  A Reduced Graphene Oxide Based Radio Frequency Glucose Sensing Device Using Multi-Dimensional Parameters.

Authors:  Byeongho Park; Hyung Goo Park; Jae-Hoon Ji; Jinsoo Cho; Seong Chan Jun
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Advancing Techniques for Investigating the Enzyme-Electrode Interface.

Authors:  Nikolay Kornienko; Khoa H Ly; William E Robinson; Nina Heidary; Jenny Z Zhang; Erwin Reisner
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 8.  Boronic Acid-based approach for separation and immobilization of glycoproteins and its application in sensing.

Authors:  Xiaojin Wang; Ning Xia; Lin Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.