Protein film photoelectrochemistry has previously been used to monitor the activity of photosystem II, the water-plastoquinone photooxidoreductase, but the mechanistic information attainable from a three-electrode setup has remained limited. Here we introduce the four-electrode rotating ring disk electrode technique for quantifying light-driven reaction kinetics and mechanistic pathways in real time at the enzyme-electrode interface. This setup allows us to study photochemical H2O oxidation in photosystem II and to gain an in-depth understanding of pathways that generate reactive oxygen species. The results show that photosystem II reacts with O2 through two main pathways that both involve a superoxide intermediate to produce H2O2. The first pathway involves the established chlorophyll triplet-mediated formation of singlet oxygen, which is followed by its reduction to superoxide at the electrode surface. The second pathway is specific for the enzyme/electrode interface: an exposed antenna chlorophyll is sufficiently close to the electrode for rapid injection of an electron to form a highly reducing chlorophyll anion, which reacts with O2 in solution to produce O2•-. Incomplete H2O oxidation does not significantly contribute to reactive oxygen formation in our conditions. The rotating ring disk electrode technique allows the chemical reactivity of photosystem II to be studied electrochemically and opens several avenues for future investigation.
Protein film photoelectrochemistry has previously been used to monitor the activity of photosystem II, the water-plastoquinone photooxidoreductase, but the mechanistic information attainable from a three-electrode setup has remained limited. Here we introduce the four-electrode rotating ring disk electrode technique for quantifying light-driven reaction kinetics and mechanistic pathways in real time at the enzyme-electrode interface. This setup allows us to study photochemical H2O oxidation in photosystem II and to gain an in-depth understanding of pathways that generate reactive oxygen species. The results show that photosystem II reacts with O2 through two main pathways that both involve a superoxide intermediate to produce H2O2. The first pathway involves the established chlorophyll triplet-mediated formation of singlet oxygen, which is followed by its reduction to superoxide at the electrode surface. The second pathway is specific for the enzyme/electrode interface: an exposed antenna chlorophyll is sufficiently close to the electrode for rapid injection of an electron to form a highly reducing chlorophyll anion, which reacts with O2 in solution to produce O2•-. Incomplete H2O oxidation does not significantly contribute to reactive oxygen formation in our conditions. The rotating ring disk electrode technique allows the chemical reactivity of photosystem II to be studied electrochemically and opens several avenues for future investigation.
Photosynthetic organisms
convert light, H2O, and CO2 into energy-rich
carbohydrates and O2 gas. This
process enabled the transformation of the primitive Earth to one with
an O2-rich atmosphere and fossil fuel containing crust.
Understanding the photosynthetic process can provide clues as to how
life on Earth emerged through its evolution, while also providing
a framework for how we can mimic photosynthesis to sustainably use
solar energy. Within this context, we have focused on the enzyme that
carries out light-driven H2O oxidation to O2, photosystem II (PSII). As it is the only protein complex capable
of catalyzing this reaction, much effort has been directed toward
studying its mechanisms of H2O oxidation catalysis,[1] as well as light absorption, energy transfer,[2] and charge separation.[3]The large-scale oxidation of water and the consequent formation
of an O2-rich atmosphere have also forced life to adapt
to surviving in the presence of O2. Of additional interest
is the resilience of PSII in an oxygenic environment, in which biologically
harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) are readily generated from O2 (Figure A).
There are two main types of ROS considered here: (i) the reduced oxygen
species, O2•–, and H2O2 originate from electron transfer from redox-active
cofactors of PSII to O2. Suggested sources include QA, QB, pheophytin, and cytochrome b559.[4] A special case of ROS
formation is the proposed generation of H2O2 from incomplete H2O oxidation. (ii) Another type of ROS, 1O2, originates from energy transfer from chlorophyll
triplet states to 3O2.[5] Deciphering these pathways in vivo is important
for understanding the resilience of photosynthetic organisms under
high stress conditions. In response to the generation of ROS, photosynthetic
species have evolved various protection mechanisms, including redox
tuning and ROS scavenging, which are key to their survival.[6]
Figure 1
Reaction pathways for ROS formation and schematic representation
of the rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE). (A) ROS can be generated
by energy transfer from chlorophyll triplets or by electron transfer
from chlorophyll and redox-active cofactors. The energy levels (pH
6.5) of the O2 relevant redox potentials, light absorbers,
and charge-carrying intermediates are illustrated in A. (B) To study
H2O oxidation and ROS generation processes, we measure
with protein film photoelectrochemistry charge injected into and out
of the enzyme in the presence of O2 through fixing PSII
onto a conductive electrode. e.t. signifies energy transfer. The RRDE
technique, using two working electrodes, allows quantification of
reaction products by reducing or oxidizing them as they are swept
from disk to ring electrode. (C) Schematic representation of the setup.
Reaction pathways for ROS formation and schematic representation
of the rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE). (A) ROS can be generated
by energy transfer from chlorophyll triplets or by electron transfer
from chlorophyll and redox-active cofactors. The energy levels (pH
6.5) of the O2 relevant redox potentials, light absorbers,
and charge-carrying intermediates are illustrated in A. (B) To study
H2O oxidation and ROS generation processes, we measure
with protein film photoelectrochemistry charge injected into and out
of the enzyme in the presence of O2 through fixing PSII
onto a conductive electrode. e.t. signifies energy transfer. The RRDE
technique, using two working electrodes, allows quantification of
reaction products by reducing or oxidizing them as they are swept
from disk to ring electrode. (C) Schematic representation of the setup.Quantitative methods to study
PSII activity and ROS generation
have been developed to obtain an understanding of the in vivo function of this enzyme. Methods to detect oxygen include gas chromatography,
Clark-type electrodes, and fluorescent sensors. There are also many
methods to detect ROS, which include the use of spin trap compounds
coupled with electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy,[4,5] luminescence,[7] mass spectrometry,[8] and electrochemistry.[9,10]Protein film photoelectrochemistry serves as a quantitative probe
of electron transfer reactions in PSII by measuring light-induced
electron transfer to or from the enzyme adsorbed on a conductive electrode
(Figure B).[11−18] H2O oxidation activity is quantified through anodic (electron
transfer from PSII to the electrode) photocurrents.[19]In addition to H2O oxidation, an oxygen
reduction pathway
was recently reported as arising at the enzyme–electrode interface.[17] This was evidenced by cathodic (electron transfer
from the electrode to PSII) photocurrents in the presence of oxygen
and was suggested to originate from electron transfer from the electrode
to the excited chlorophyll, forming a chlorophyll anion, which then
reduces O2.[17] In view of the
likely presence of 1O2 generated by chlorophyll
triplet states,[5,6] a second, or indeed alternative,
origin of the cathodic photocurrents is the reduction of 1O2. Clarification of the precise mechanism(s) behind the
cathodic photocurrents is important for the understanding of the PSII–electrode
interface and for the use of protein film photoelectrochemistry as
a tool for studying PSII enzymology.In the field of protein
film electrochemistry, rotating disk electrode
(RDE) measurements are a valuable tool for precise electrochemical
quantification of enzyme catalysis with fast turnover frequencies
(TOFs), providing a controlled convectional flux of reactants toward
the enzyme-loaded electrode.[20−22] The rotating ring disk electrode
(RRDE) method extends the capacity of RDE experiments by incorporating
a second working electrode surrounding the disk to electrochemically
quantify reaction products formed at the disk. The reaction products
are hydrodynamically driven from the disk to the ring electrode due
to the rotation of the apparatus.[23−25]In this work,
we have applied the RRDE method to PSII protein film
photoelectrochemistry to measure photocurrents and the resulting reaction
products from H2O oxidation and cathodic ROS generation
(Figure C). The RRDE
technique offers a new approach in PSII studies because it allows
for the real-time (∼ms) analysis of reaction pathways without
the necessities of high currents (∼nA sensitivity) and bulk
product accumulation, during which a species of interest may be lost
by further reactions with the enzyme or solution. This work demonstrates
that PSII H2O oxidation and the resulting O2 generation can be quantitatively measured with the RRDE technique.
This method was then used to show that photocathodic currents can
distinguish between the two ROS-generating pathways, one in which
O2 is directly reduced by electron transfer from a chlorophyll a (Chl a) anion radical formed by electron
injection from the electrode into the Chl a* and
the second by the reduction of 1O2 formed by
the reaction with 3O2 with the chlorophyll triplet,
which is one of the main causes of photodamage in photosystem II.[5] We further show that H2O2 ROS can be generated and quantified without the need for an electrode
to electrochemically reduce the protein, indicating that the results
of this study may be translated to PSII behavior in vivo.
Results
We started with three-electrode RDE studies of isolated
PSII on
a mesoporous indium tin oxide (ITO) film and comparing the photoelectrochemical
response to Chl a on a planar glassy carbon electrode
as a simplified model system. The chlorophyll content was quantified
by UV–vis spectrophotometry (Figure S1). The electrode was exposed to chopped (intermittent) illumination
with an applied bias potential ranging from 0.8 to −0.4 V vs
the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), and the resulting photocurrents
were recorded (Figure ). When PSII was immobilized on an electrode, two types of photocurrents
were observed: anodic photocurrent originating from light-induced
electron transfer to the PSII acceptor side (to QA or QB) driven by water oxidation and cathodic photocurrents linked
to O2 reduction. The anodic response has been analyzed
in detail previously,[12,13,16,19] and the cathodic currents are the primary
focus of study in this work. At an applied potential more negative
than 0.2 V (for PSII) and 0.5 V (for Chl a) vs SHE,
both samples exhibited a cathodic photocurrent, as previously reported
(Figure A,B).[17] This occurs in an air-saturated electrolyte
solution but not under N2, indicating the involvement of
O2. Inhibiting the H2O oxidation photocurrents
with the QB inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea
(DCMU) did not result in a decrease of cathodic photocurrents (Figure A).
Figure 2
Study of immobilized
PSII and Chl a activity on
a RDE. At pH 6.5 under chopped 8 mW cm–2 660 nm
illumination, PSII (A) and Chl a (B) exhibit a cathodic
current only in an air-saturated electrolyte solution. The plots show
background-corrected photocurrents. The insets in A and B illustrate
a typical photoresponse for PSII at 0.6 V (A) and for Chl a at −0.3 V (B) vs SHE. Upon varying solution pH
from 4.74 to 7.58, PSII (C) and Chl a (D), photocurrents
increase at lower pH values. A kinetic isotope effect upon the addition
of deuterated buffer was observed (inset of D). Both PSII (E) and
Chl a (F) exhibit an enhanced cathodic current (IRed.) at −0.3 V vs SHE at lower pH, whereas
the anodic H2O oxidation current (IOx.) at 0.6 V vs SHE in PSII is maximized at pH 6.5–6.9.
Study of immobilized
PSII and Chl a activity on
a RDE. At pH 6.5 under chopped 8 mW cm–2 660 nm
illumination, PSII (A) and Chl a (B) exhibit a cathodic
current only in an air-saturated electrolyte solution. The plots show
background-corrected photocurrents. The insets in A and B illustrate
a typical photoresponse for PSII at 0.6 V (A) and for Chl a at −0.3 V (B) vs SHE. Upon varying solution pH
from 4.74 to 7.58, PSII (C) and Chl a (D), photocurrents
increase at lower pH values. A kinetic isotope effect upon the addition
of deuterated buffer was observed (inset of D). Both PSII (E) and
Chl a (F) exhibit an enhanced cathodic current (IRed.) at −0.3 V vs SHE at lower pH, whereas
the anodic H2O oxidation current (IOx.) at 0.6 V vs SHE in PSII is maximized at pH 6.5–6.9.We next probed the effects of
pH on cathodic (O2 reduction)
and anodic (H2O oxidation) photocurrents for PSII and Chl a (Figure C–F). The O2 evolution activity (anodic photocurrents)
was maximized at pH 6.5–6.9 for PSII and decreases at lower
and higher pH values. This trend is similar to those previously observed
in in vitro studies and stems from the interplay
of H2O oxidation catalysis and kinetics of electron transfer
through the quinone acceptors.[26]Both PSII and Chl a exhibited increased cathodic
photocurrents in lower pH electrolyte solutions, which supports the
involvement of protons in the photocathodic reaction pathway. This
is supported by a kinetic isotope effect (KIE) of approximately 1.4
for Chl a (Figure D inset). However, KIEs as high as 3.4 have been observed
for electrochemical O2 reduction limited by proton-coupled
steps, suggesting the rate-determining step(s) in our system are not
proton-coupled.[27,28] This observation points to the
generation of O2•– as a rate-limiting
step, followed by proton-dependent steps in H2O2 or H2O generation.After examining PSII and Chl a with the RDE, we
investigated the reaction products with our RRDE setup, using a Pt
ring electrode to reduce or oxidize products formed at the disk electrode.
This configuration consisted of a glassy carbon or mesoporous ITO
disk (working electrode 1, WE 1), platinum ring (WE 2), Ag/AgCl reference
(RE), and glassy carbon counter (CE) electrodes in a one-compartment
electrochemical cell, which was illuminated from the bottom with a
660 nm light-emitting diode (LED) (8 mW cm–2; Figure C). The rotation
of the working electrode apparatus draws in reactants (e.g., O2) to the disk electrode, and a quantifiable fraction (defined
by the collection efficiency, Figure S2) of the reaction products (e.g., O2 or H2O2) flow to the ring electrode. The electrochemical potential
on the ring electrode is set to carry out only the reaction of interest
(e.g., H2O2 oxidation). The collection efficiency
was quantified using a ferri/ferrocyanide redox couple as well as
H2O oxidation/O2 reduction. The fraction of
photocurrent directed toward a particular product is quantified by
the ratio of ring to disk currents and is dependent on the electrode
geometry (Figures S2, S3).We first
quantified the activity of PSII for photoanodic H2O oxidation
by PSII (at the disk) by reducing (at the ring
electrode) the O2 liberated. When the disk was biased at
0.5 V vs SHE in a nitrogen-purged pH 6.5 electrolyte solution (to
avoid bulk O2 reduction from the ring electrode) and illuminated
with 660 nm light, an anodic current stemming from electron transfer
from PSII to the electrode during H2O oxidation was observed
at the disk electrode. The anodic disk current was accompanied by
a cathodic ring current (Figure A and Figures S4, S5). Quantifying
the photocurrent ratios revealed that O2 was produced with
a faradaic efficiency of 94–98%. Direct quantification of O2 generation at the enzyme–electrode interface may open
up possibilities for studying, in real time, PSII photoactivation
and H2O oxidation photocatalysis of PSII enzymes with reconstituted
Mn clusters or with synthetic water oxidation catalysts inserted in
place of the Mn cluster in future studies.[29] Next, we investigated the reaction pathways that led to cathodic
photocurrents at the disk electrode. Cathodic photocurrents can potentially
stem from electron transfer from the chlorophylls to O2 to generate O2•– and H2O2.[17] According to the proposed
mechanism, electron injection from the electrode into a nearby photoexcited
chlorophyll ground state would produce a relatively long-lived chlorophyll
anion. This very reducing chlorophyll anion could then easily transfer
an electron to O2. An alternative pathway consists of the
well-known generation of 1O2 via energy transfer
from chlorophyll triplets to 3O2 and subsequent
electron transfer on the electrode surface to 1O2. The generation of a chlorophyll triplet in PSII is considered to
be the main source of photodamage.[5,6] The initial
chlorophyll triplet formation is not thought to be due to standard
intersystem crossing from the excited singlet chlorophylls but from
the radical pair recombination mechanism in the heart of the reaction
center (Figure A).[30]
Figure 3
H2O oxidation and ROS generation measured by
the RRDE
setup. (A) H2O oxidation and the resultant O2 produced were first measured for PSII. Cathodic disk currents from
PSII (B) and Chl a (C) were accompanied by anodic
ring currents. (D) Their magnitudes (shown for Chl a) scaled with each other at an applied potential of 0.5 to −0.5
V vs SHE to the disk electrode and 0.9 V vs SHE to the ring electrode.
The addition of catalase to PSII (E) and Chl a (F)
electrodes suppressed the majority of the ring photocurrents (applied
potentials of −0.5 V to the disk and 0.9 V to the ring electrodes,
pH 6.5). (G) The ROS current efficiency for Chl a, PSII, the CP43 and LHCII antenna subunits, and RC was pH-dependent,
with the proteins exhibiting lower H2O2 production
compared to Chl a.
H2O oxidation and ROS generation measured by
the RRDE
setup. (A) H2O oxidation and the resultant O2 produced were first measured for PSII. Cathodic disk currents from
PSII (B) and Chl a (C) were accompanied by anodic
ring currents. (D) Their magnitudes (shown for Chl a) scaled with each other at an applied potential of 0.5 to −0.5
V vs SHE to the disk electrode and 0.9 V vs SHE to the ring electrode.
The addition of catalase to PSII (E) and Chl a (F)
electrodes suppressed the majority of the ring photocurrents (applied
potentials of −0.5 V to the disk and 0.9 V to the ring electrodes,
pH 6.5). (G) The ROS current efficiency for Chl a, PSII, the CP43 and LHCII antenna subunits, and RC was pH-dependent,
with the proteins exhibiting lower H2O2 production
compared to Chl a.In the presence of O2, a light-driven cathodic
disk
current was accompanied by an anodic ring photocurrent for PSII and
Chl a (Figure B–D). The disk and ring currents scaled with one another
across −0.4 to 0.4 V vs SHE (Figure D), indicating that the currents at the ring
were induced by products formed at the disk.We next investigated
the nature of the reactions responsible for
the anodic currents stemming from our ring electrode. First, we added
catalase, an enzyme that dismutates H2O2 into
H2O and O2, to the electrolyte solution. Catalase
addition quenched ∼90% of the ring current, implying that the
oxidation of H2O2 is the dominant reaction at
the ring electrode (Figure E,F and Figures S6, S7). H2O2 from the bulk solution was also detected with
a fluorescent assay from the bulk solution (Figure S7). However, any H2O generated from the reduction
of O2 or ROS would not be detected at the ring electrode.
The addition of superoxide dismutase (SOD), which dismutates O2•– to O2 and H2O2, to the electrolyte solution decreased the cathodic
photocurrents by ∼20%, suggesting that O2•– is involved in the reaction pathway(s) (Figure S8). Because O2•– may also
dismutate spontaneously in solution or be further reduced by the negatively
biased electrode to generate H2O2, we cannot
yet quantify how much of the H2O2 is produced
from O2•–.The relative
current ratios of the ring to disk electrodes (taking
into account the electrode’s collection efficiency) were measured
for Chl a, PSII, the CP43 and LHCII antennae, which
are chlorophyll-containing components of PSII, and the D1–D2
reaction center (RC). In our setup, the current ratio for H2O2 production increased with increasing pH for all of
the samples investigated. However, Chl a exhibited
the steepest slope (H2O2 current ratio vs pH)
and the largest overall H2O2 production rates
in comparison to the chlorophyll-containing proteins.Control
experiments with the antennae suggest that cathodic photocurrents
stem primarily from the chlorophylls rather than other redox-active
cofactors in PSII. This current ratio did not significantly change
with applied bias, with the presence/absence of 2-(N-morpholino)-ethanesulfonic acid (MES) in the electrolyte solution,
or with white light (more closely matching the solar spectrum) vs
660 nm illumination (Figures S9, S10).
The ring/disk current ratios also did not significantly change upon
systematically modulating the O2 content in the electrolyte
solution, suggesting that the observed reaction pathways are similar
under the experimental range of O2 concentrations (1.25
to 0.04 mM) (Figure S10). Increased H2O2 production by Chl a relative
to the other samples points to differing reaction mechanisms, reflecting
the chemical environment of the chlorophylls in the proteins (Figures G and S11).The following experiments were conducted
to investigate the reaction
pathways resulting in H2O2. Perturbed or chemically
modified PSII has been reported to produce H2O2 from incomplete water oxidation.[8,31−35] To probe for ROS formation during incomplete H2O oxidation
in our system, we performed H2O oxidation at the PSII-loaded
disk electrode at a bias of 0.6 V vs SHE. At the same time, we poised
the ring electrode at 0.8 V vs SHE to oxidize any H2O2 that would be formed at the disk during this process. We
did not observe significant amounts of ROS in this configuration (Figure S12), which is consistent with the essentially
quantitative faradaic yield for H2O oxidation to O2 (see above). Furthermore, there were no measurable differences
in disk/ring current ratios of intact PSII and Mn-depleted PSII (Figure S13). If a significant quantity of H2O2 originated from the oxygen evolving complex
(OEC), then we should have observed relatively more H2O2 oxidation at the ring electrode. We therefore conclude that
the primary source of H2O2 did not originate
from incomplete water oxidation by PSII. Future applications of the
rotating ring disk electrode technique can be used to probe donor-side
ROS generation from PSII samples that had undergone specific treatments
to induce partial H2O oxidation.[31−35]Two likely reaction pathways toward H2O2 generation
as a product of the cathodic photocurrents seem possible. Both pathways
involve the formation of O2•–,
which then dismutates or is reduced to H2O2:
(i) the direct electron transfer from the chlorophyll anion (formed
by electron injection into the excited state chlorophyll exposed to
the electrode in PSII and isolated Chl a) to O2 to generate O2•– [17]and (ii) O2•– generation from the reduction of 1O2, generated
from the chlorophyll triplet (in PSII or isolated Chl a) (Figures A and S14). The disk/ring current ratios remained relatively
unchanged over a measurement period of 10–20 min for Chl a and PSII, suggesting that the H2O2 generation is a continuous process rather than one involving a ROS
scavenger (Figure S15).
Figure 4
Pathways of oxygen reduction.
(A) PSII may interact with oxygen
through an electron transfer pathway or through a 1O2 involving an energy and electron transfer pathway. (B, C)
The electron transfer pathway can be increased by embedding PSII and
its constituent units in a conductive polymer to wire it to the electrode
more efficiently (pH 6.5, 0.1 V vs SHE). The photocurrent increase
is compared to the photocurrent of Chl a and proteins
observed without the use of the polymer. (D) 1O2 generation and disk photocathodic current from its subsequent reduction
were partially suppressed through the inclusion of 10 mM DABCO or
azide water-soluble quenchers (pH 6.5, −0.3 V vs SHE). The
photocurrent decrease is relative to that observed prior to quencher
addition. On the other hand, the energy transfer pathway was preferentially
enhanced by doubly reducing QA with a dithionite and light
treatment to promote radical pair recombination generation of chlorophyll
triplet in PSII and to extend the lifetime of the chlorophyll triplet.
(E) Both of these effects promote 1O2 generation,
and this increases photocathodic currents through the subsequent reduction
of this species (pH 6.5, −0.3 V vs SHE). All measurements were
performed in an ambient air environment.
Pathways of oxygen reduction.
(A) PSII may interact with oxygen
through an electron transfer pathway or through a 1O2 involving an energy and electron transfer pathway. (B, C)
The electron transfer pathway can be increased by embedding PSII and
its constituent units in a conductive polymer to wire it to the electrode
more efficiently (pH 6.5, 0.1 V vs SHE). The photocurrent increase
is compared to the photocurrent of Chl a and proteins
observed without the use of the polymer. (D) 1O2 generation and disk photocathodic current from its subsequent reduction
were partially suppressed through the inclusion of 10 mM DABCO or
azide water-soluble quenchers (pH 6.5, −0.3 V vs SHE). The
photocurrent decrease is relative to that observed prior to quencher
addition. On the other hand, the energy transfer pathway was preferentially
enhanced by doubly reducing QA with a dithionite and light
treatment to promote radical pair recombination generation of chlorophyll
triplet in PSII and to extend the lifetime of the chlorophyll triplet.
(E) Both of these effects promote 1O2 generation,
and this increases photocathodic currents through the subsequent reduction
of this species (pH 6.5, −0.3 V vs SHE). All measurements were
performed in an ambient air environment.For O2 reduction to proceed through electron transfer
to O2 from any antenna chlorophylls, the chlorophyll anion
formation needs to occur rapidly through fast electron injection into
the chlorophyll ground state during the lifetime of the excited state,
and this would likely proceed when the Chl a is near
the electrode. Only a limited surface of the enzyme is expected to
be in direct electrical contact with the conductive electrode, and
electron transfer to O2 is limited because electron injection
into the majority of excited antenna Chl a does not
occur to a significant extent before excitation is lost due to excitation
transfer or its relaxation to the ground state. Therefore, embedding
PSII in a redox polymer or conductive matrix should enhance the rate
of ground state regeneration and consequently the rate of electron
transfer to O2.[17] To test this
hypothesis, we drop cast a PSII–poly(1-vinylimidazole-co-allylamine)-Os(bipy)2Cl (Pos) redox
polymer[16] blend (1:1 (v/v) PSII stock to
10 mg mL−1 polymer) on the ITO disk electrode and
compared the magnitude to an equivalent Pos-free electrode
at 0.1 V vs SHE, where electrochemical dark reduction reactions would
be minimized (Figures B,C and S16). A ∼2–4-fold
enhancement in disk and ring currents suggests that the electron transfer
pathway is occurring and can be enhanced by increased enzyme wiring
via polymer embedding, which is consistent with analogous studies
performed using a C60-containing derivative as the matrix.[17] Enhanced cathodic photocurrents are also observed
with the antennae, and the origin of this photocurrent likely stems
from this electron transfer pathway.We also tested for the
possibility of reduction of H2O2 by Chl a and PSII in the absence of
O2, which would likely occur only through electron transfer.
Upon purging the solution with nitrogen and then titrating in H2O2, an increase in photocathodic currents was observed
(Figure S17), likely originating from electron
transfer to H2O2, forming water.We next
investigated the possibility of H2O2 generation
through 1O2 formation and its reduction
on the electrode to give rise to the disk photocathodic currents.
We first titrated in 1O2 quenchers, 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane
(DABCO)[36] or sodium azide,[37] during our measurement and evaluated their effects on the
disk currents. Quenching 1O2 would eliminate
its reduction at the electrode surface and the consequent cathodic
currents from this process. Indeed, for both Chl a and PSII, the photocathodic currents were slightly reduced upon
the addition of either 10 mM DABCO or 10 mM sodium azide (Figure D and Figures S18, S19). In contrast, photocathodic
currents (after an initial stabilization period of 5 min) were much
less affected by the exposure to the same light but in the absence
of the 1O2 quenchers. Control experiments performed
by titrating in DABCO and sodium azide to a glassy carbon electrode
with an adsorbed layer of an established 1O2 generator, Rose Bengal (RB), also decreased the photocathodic currents
(Figures D and S19C).To verify the involvement of PSII-generated 1O2, we performed experiments to selectively promote 1O2 production by modulating the electron transport
chain of
PSII. We first titrated in inhibitors of the QB pocket,
which would tune the energy redox level of QA by anchoring
into the QB site. These would modify the redox levels of
QA and result in increased yield of 1O2 by enhancing triplet formation.[38,39] Addition of
1 mM DCMU or 1 mM bromoxynil did not measurably modify the disk currents
(Figure S20). This indicates that the effect
conferred by the inhibitors did not result in a measurable increase
of 1O2 generation and reduction in our system.We then turned to generating the doubly reduced QA,
the quinol of QA, which results in an increase of the chlorophyll
triplet yield and in increase of the chlorophyll triplet lifetime,
both of which result in a marked increase of 1O2 generation.[40−42] We measured the cathodic photocurrents of a PSII
electrode, where QA was doubly reduced by soaking in 100
mM sodium dithionite and exposing it to 660 nm light. After subsequent
removal and photoelectrochemical probing of the sample, the photocurrents
were compared with those measured before the dithionite treatment
of the sample (Figure E). We observed a ∼5-fold enhancement of photocathodic currents.
This points to 1O2 singlet formation and that 1O2 reduction is also contributing to the disk currents.
As controls, equivalent treatments of Chl a or LHCII
electrodes, as well as soaking and illuminating a PSII electrode in
a dithionite-free solution, did not lead to increased photocathodic
currents (Figure S21).We also demonstrated
that the study of ROS formation is not entirely
dependent on a conductive disk electrode, and the relative ROS formation
rate with and without electrode reduction reactions can be quantified
with our RRDE setup. Light-driven ring currents were compared in the
rotating ring disk electrode setup from PSII adsorbed onto the ITO
at a negative bias, held at open circuit (∼0 V vs SHE), and
to PSII adsorbed on an insulating parafilm layer covering the disk
electrode. We discovered that ROS can still be detected at the ring
electrode in these situations, at approximately 25% and 4% relative
to the ROS detected from the enzyme on a disk electrode at −0.3
V vs SHE (Figure S22). Similar values were
recorded for Chl a, CP43, LHCII, and the RC. These
data indicate that H2O2 can be generated without
the necessity of a negatively biased electrode in the proximity of
the protein. The ring electrode currents observed without the negative
bias may be due to the generation of chlorophyll-mediated 1O2 production; the decrease in the current due to the
insulating layer may reflect the role of the disk electrode reducing
the 1O2 to superoxide and/or peroxide. Protein
oxidation would be a possible consequence of 1O2 reduction without the reducing electrode environment. However, we
cannot completely discount the electron transfer pathway from the
Chl a anion. These measurements provide an initial
demonstration of the ability to study ROS in PSII that may be formed in vivo without the need for a negatively biased electrode.
Discussion
We have established the rotating ring disk electrode technique
as an effective method to study and quantitatively probe photosystem
II. This work has resulted in several key findings.(1) We have
demonstrated the capability to quantitatively monitor
H2O oxidation by PSII films on electrodes. Measuring H2O oxidation in real time will be further useful for assessing
the compatibility of various electrode surfaces and for studying,
for example, mechanisms of PSII assembly and photoactivation.(2) Evidence for incomplete water oxidation with our PSII preparation
in the RRDE system was not observed. We take this as an indication
that the water-oxidizing enzyme functions normally when immobilized
on the electrode. However, the rotating ring disk electrode system
can be useful in future experiments for direct monitoring of incomplete
H2O oxidation in PSII samples that have been specifically
modified or chemically perturbed to selectively induce this reaction
pathway.[31−35](3) Cathodic currents at the PSII-loaded disk electrode led
to
H2O2, detected at the ring electrode. H2O2 formed by O2•– is generated via two distinct pathways: (i) electron transfer to
O2 by a chlorophyll anion, which is thought to be generated
in an antenna chlorophyll exposed to the negatively biased electrode,
and (ii) triplet energy transfer to 3O2 from
a chlorophyll triplet, which in PSII is generated by radical pair
recombination within the reaction center core. The chlorophyll triplet
route produces 1O2, which is then reduced at
the disk electrode. Evidence for the existence of each pathway was
obtained by either (i) wiring the enzyme to the electrode with a redox-active
polymer that may favor electron injection into the excited state chlorophyll
or (ii) double reduction of QA, which is the well-established
method for increasing the chloropyll triplet yield and lifetime in
PSII.[40−42] This points to the ability of the RRDE technique
in this context to detect product formation and evaluate reaction
pathways, and this allowed distinguishing between the electrode-induced
chlorophyll anion pathway and the physiologically relevant chlorophyll
triplet pathway. In relevance to PSII function in the thylakoid membrane,
H2O2 formation from 1O2 does not hinge on the presence of a negatively biased electrode,
as 1O2 may be easily reduced by a number of
different species. Future work may permit lower yielding electron
transfer pathways from cofactors on the electron transfer side[4] to be distinguished from the two primary pathways
studied here.(4) Our RRDE apparatus demonstrated that the formation
of H2O2 occurs without requiring a negatively
biased
electrode through experiments conducted with the proteins adsorbed
on top of insulating layers. Such an experiment takes advantage of
the well-defined reactant flux in an RRDE apparatus, which does not
exist in a stationary electrochemical setup. This observation, coupled
with the detection of 1O2-generating pathways
and study of H2O2 in a wide range (0.04 to 1.25
mM) of oxygen concentrations, suggests that the rotating ring disk
electrode system is potentially useful for studying the function of
PSII in vivo. Furthermore, this line of experiments
shows that H2O2 may be readily formed within
the PSII natural environment via the reduction of 1O2 through the oxidation of an amino acid residue,
redox-active species, or the chlorophyll. In the future, thylakoids
or even whole cells can be loaded on the disk electrode and subjected
to a similar set of conditions.Looking beyond PSII, photochemical
reactions of photosystem I can
be quantified.[43] “Dark” enzyme
electrocatalysts on photoelectrodes (i.e., hydrogenase on silicon
photocathodes[44]) can also be probed. Pertinent
mechanistic questions regarding photoactivation of biological units
containing other oxidoreductases such as nitrogenases[45] can now be addressed by detecting reaction intermediates
and products with the RRDE. Extending beyond enzymes to whole cells,
the study of redox mediator-based photocurrents of photosynthetic
bacteria is another intriguing path to probe. In a larger context,
the continuous development of methodology to investigate photosynthesis,
such as that presented in this work, is crucial to understand this
process.
Methods and Materials
Biological Material
PSII, CP43, LCHII, and the RC were
isolated according to previously established extraction and characterization
procedures.[46] PSII was extracted from Thermosynechococcus elongatus. A His-tagged CP47 mutant
was the source of the PSII.[46] The PSII
cores were isolated through the use of Ni2+ affinity chromatography
essentially as first described in ref (47). CP43, LHCII, and RC were all isolated from
spinach. CP43 particles were isolated through ion-exchange chromatography
from PSII particles that were tris-washed and solubilized with β-dodecyl
maltoside.[48] The RC complex was isolated
through incubation with a nonionic detergent, purified through ion
exchange chromatography, and lacked the plastoquinones, the nonheme
iron, and the MnCa cluster.[49] It contained
four Chl a, two pheophytin, a cytochrome b559, and two peripheral Chl a molecules. The materials described above were kept in the dark in
liquid nitrogen before use. A freshly thawed aliquot was used for
each set of measurements. Catalase (from bovine liver) and SOD (from
bovine erythrocytes) were both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Prior
to use, an appropriate amount (∼12 mg in each case) was dissolved
in 5 mL of the same buffer as used for the electrochemical experiments,
and the solution was added directly to the electrolyte solution (∼125
mL). To generate Mn-depleted PSII, PSII aliquots (20 μL, ∼2.5
mg Chl mL–1) were diluted and incubated in buffer
with reducing and chelating agents NH2OH (10 mM) and EDTA
(0.5 mM), respectively, on ice (4 °C), for 30 min in the dark.
The solution was then washed and resuspended in MES buffer three times
and finally resuspended in buffer to reach a Chl a concentration of approximately 2 mg Chl mL–1.
Electrode Preparation
All electrode preparation and
material handling were conducted in a dark environment to minimize
PSII photodamage. In all cases, a glassy carbon working electrode
was used with a surface area of 0.2 cm2. Chlorophyll a (Sigma-Aldrich, from spinach), 3 μL of 100 μg
mL–1 in ethanol, was drop cast onto a freshly polished
glassy carbon surface and allowed to dry in the dark. ITO electrodes
were prepared by drop casting 3 μL of a stock of 20% by weight
ITO (50 nm, Sigma-Aldrich) in ethanol with 5 M acetic acid onto a
freshly polished glassy carbon surface and drying for 20 min at 80
°C in air. Following this, the electrodes were treated with UV-ozone
for 15 min. A 1 μL amount of PSII, CP43, and LHCII were drop
cast onto the ITO electrodes and dried for approximately 15 min.
Electrochemical Measurements
An Alvatek Ivium CompactStat
equipped with bipotentiostat capabilities was utilized for electrochemical
measurements. Unless indicated otherwise, the electrolyte consisted
of MES, 20 mM CaCl2, 15 mM MgCl2, and 50 mM
KCl. The desired pH was reached through titration with an appropriate
amount of KOH or HCl. A double-junction Ag/AgCl reference electrode
and a glassy carbon rod counter electrode were used. The working electrode
consisted of a glassy carbon disk (0.2 cm2) and, in cases
of RRDE measurements, a Pt ring with dimensions of 6.5 mm inner diameter,
7.5 mm outer diameter enclosed in a PEEK body (Pine Research Instrumentation,
E6R1 ChangeDisk). The mesoporous ITO was deposited from a solution
consisting of 20 wt % ITO nanoparticles (∼50 nm from Sigma-Aldrich)
and 5 M acetic acid. A 3 μL amount of this solution was drop
cast onto the glassy carbon disk and dried in an 80 °C oven for
30 min to remove the solvent and improve electrical connectivity between
the particles. Following this procedure, the surface was subjected
to a UV-ozone plasma treatment for 10 min to remove residual organic
species.[12]The electrode was rotated
at 400 rpm (Princeton Applied Research model 636A electrode rotator)
to attain a steady reactant flux to the disk and ring surfaces. We
employed a four-necked flask (one neck for working, counter, and reference
electrodes and one neck as a gas inlet) at room temperature, with
measurements being performed in a pH 6.5 electrolyte solution (unless
specified otherwise). Our samples were illuminated from the bottom
at 8 mW cm–2 by a 660 nm LED to closely match the
Chl a and PSII absorption. Current–voltage
curves were recorded in a stepped chronoamperometry mode: the voltage
on the disk electrode was systematically increased/decreased, and
the working electrode was subjected to chopped illumination. The resulting
light-induced currents were recorded, and their magnitudes (light–dark
current) were used to plot data such as in Figure . For testing enhanced photocathodic currents
through redox-polymer wiring, PSII and other units were mixed with
a 10 mg mL–1 aqueous stock of a poly(1-vinylimidazole-co-allylamine)-Os(bipy)2Cl polymer (synthesized
according to previously published procedures[16]), prior to drop casting on the ITO electrode. The total amounts
of enzymes/components were kept constant. Reductive activation (QA double reduction) of PSII was carried out by taking a PSII-loaded
electrode that had been previously tested and soaking in a pH 6.5
MES buffer solution with 100 mM sodium dithionite for 30 min and subjecting
the PSII electrode to 5 min of illumination (660 nm, 8 mW cm–2) in this solution, prior to rinsing with fresh electrolyte and testing
again in the same experimental conditions. Error bars are generated
from the standard deviation of typically 3–6 independent measurements.To detect H2O2 and O2•– through their electrochemical oxidation, the Pt ring electrode was
held at ∼50 mV negative of the thermodynamic H2O
oxidation potential (1.18 vs the reversible hydrogen electrode, which
was pH dependent in this case to provide the maximum electrochemical
overpotential to ensure all available H2O2 and
O2•– were oxidized at the ring).
This potential was also too negative to oxidize H2O or
to oxidize H2O2 through a 1e– oxidation. O2 was detected by reducing
it at the ring electrode at 50 mV positive of the thermodynamic hydrogen
evolution reaction potential in an air-free environment bubbled with
N2. O2 reduction measurements were performed
with an air-saturated electrolyte (0.26 mM O2). In cases
where DCMU was utilized, a stock of each was prepared in the dark
(100 mM in DMSO) and an appropriate amount was added to achieve 1
mM in the electrolyte solution. The collection efficiency of the RRDE
(determined to be 26% by the manufacturer, Pine Research Instrumentation)[50] was quantified for both planar and mesoporous
surfaces using a standard ferri/ferrocyanide redox couple across a
range of rotation rates. This was recorded to be 26.0% and 25.2% at
400 rpm for the planar and mesoporous geometries, respectively.
Chlorophyll a Quantification
After
each measurement, the working electrode was sonicated in 1 mL of methanol
to extract all Chl a in the sample. Chl a content was calculated using λ665 (ε = 79.95
(mg Chl a)−1 mL cm–1).[51] In the case of materials adsorbed
onto ITO films, the electrodes were first sonicated in methanol; then
any remaining ITO was scratched off into the solution. The methanol
solution was sonicated and the supernatant analyzed for Chl a content.
Authors: Arezki Sedoud; Lisa Kastner; Nicholas Cox; Sabah El-Alaoui; Diana Kirilovsky; A William Rutherford Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2010-10-29
Authors: Dong Heon Nam; Jenny Z Zhang; Virgil Andrei; Nikolay Kornienko; Nina Heidary; Andreas Wagner; Kenichi Nakanishi; Katarzyna P Sokol; Barnaby Slater; Ingo Zebger; Stephan Hofmann; Juan C Fontecilla-Camps; Chan Beum Park; Erwin Reisner Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Elisabet Romero; Ramunas Augulis; Vladimir I Novoderezhkin; Marco Ferretti; Jos Thieme; Donatas Zigmantas; Rienk van Grondelle Journal: Nat Phys Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 20.034
Authors: Nikolay Kornienko; Khoa H Ly; William E Robinson; Nina Heidary; Jenny Z Zhang; Erwin Reisner Journal: Acc Chem Res Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 22.384