Literature DB >> 24557031

Comparing the performance plateau in adult cochlear implant patients using HINT and AzBio.

Sean T Massa1, Michael J Ruckenstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the performance plateau in adult cochlear implant recipients after the initial postimplantation increase by using word recognition testing and an explicit definition of performance plateau. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Urban, tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-five patients with 138 devices tested with AzBio were matched to 130 patients with 138 devices tested with HINT based on performed on CNC monosyllable tests. INTERVENTION: Patient's performance was measured overtime using AzBio and HINT tests to determine when and at what score their performance reached a plateau. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Time from implantation to reach a performance plateau and plateau score with each test.
RESULTS: Thirty-four devices reached a HINT plateau and 30 devices reached an AzBio plateau. Patients reached plateaus at similar times postoperatively using HINT and AzBio, 18.8 and 16.5 weeks, respectively (p = 0.476). Five patients tested with HINT plateaued at scores of 99% to 100%, whereas no patients plateaued above 92% with AzBio.
CONCLUSION: Patients reached a plateau in performance at similar median times using AzBio and HINT, despite the ceiling effect of HINT in some patients. Most patients who reach a plateau did so within 4 months, but exactly when and if a patient's performance plateaus varies significantly among individuals. Further study is required to determine which test best reflects when a patient reaches his or her maximal performance in natural listening conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557031     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  10 in total

1.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Gabrielle Underwood; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; David R Moore; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Are Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients Consistent Across Different Tests?

Authors:  Nicholas S Andresen; Varun Vohra; Deepa J Galaiya; Courtney L Carver; Dawn D Marsiglia; Jennifer D Yeagle; Francis X Creighton; Nae-Yuh Wang; Stephen P Bowditch; Charles C Della Santina; Daniel Q Sun
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Cortical Activation Patterns Correlate with Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cristen Olds; Luca Pollonini; Homer Abaya; Jannine Larky; Megan Loy; Heather Bortfeld; Michael S Beauchamp; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Speech Recognition in Noise for Adults With Normal Hearing: Age-Normative Performance for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Laura M Levin; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  The Relationship Between Impedance, Programming and Word Recognition in a Large Clinical Dataset of Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Benjamin Caswell-Midwinter; Elizabeth M Doney; Meisam K Arjmandi; Kelly N Jahn; Barbara S Herrmann; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Adult Normative Data for the Adaptation of the Hearing in Noise Test in European French (HINT-5 Min).

Authors:  Johanna Buisson Savin; Pierre Reynard; Eric Bailly-Masson; Célia Joseph; Charles-Alexandre Joly; Catherine Boiteux; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14

9.  Duration of Processor Use Per Day Is Significantly Correlated With Speech Recognition Abilities in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Nichole C Dwyer; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  Postoperative Rehabilitation Strategies Used by Adults With Cochlear Implants: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Natalie R Capretta; Shirley C Henning; Laura Feeney; Mark A Pitt; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.