Literature DB >> 2269736

Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat.

C J Brown1, P J Abbas.   

Abstract

In a companion paper [Brown et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1385-1391 (1990)], a method for recording the electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential in human cochlear implant users was reported. The procedure for recording the response requires that two biphasic current pulses, a "masker" and a "probe," be presented at a rate and level sufficient to drive the auditory nerve into a refractory state. The present study was designed to assess the sensitivity of that recording technique to variations in stimulation parameters. The experiments described in this paper demonstrate that: (1) the EAP as recorded in the cat is triphasic and is defined by two negative peaks occurring at latencies of approximately 0.26 and 0.82 ms; (2) EAP amplitude is independent of the level of the masker stimulus for current levels equal to or greater than the current level of the probe stimulus; and (3) the time course of recovery of the EAP from the refractory state is stable over a range of both probe and masker current levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2269736     DOI: 10.1121/1.400117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

2.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Neural origin of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Measurement of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Brandon D Swan; David T Brocker; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

6.  A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Bruna S S Mussoi; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Characterization of the electrically evoked compound action potential of the vestibular nerve.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Steven M Bierer; Leo Ling; Trey Oxford; Jay T Rubinstein; James O Phillips
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Recording evoked potentials during deep brain stimulation: development and validation of instrumentation to suppress the stimulus artefact.

Authors:  A R Kent; W M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.