| Literature DB >> 31027364 |
Hassan Ashktorab1, Akbar Soleimani2, Gulshan Singh3, Amr Amin4, Solmaz Tabtabaei5, Giovanni Latella6, Ulrike Stein7,8, Shahin Akhondzadeh9, Naimesh Solanki10, Marjorie C Gondré-Lewis11, Aida Habtezion12, Hassan Brim13.
Abstract
Saffron is a natural compound that has been used for centuries in many parts of the world as a food colorant and additive. It was shown to have the ability to mitigate various disorders through its known anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties. Several studies have shown the effectiveness of saffron in the treatment of various chronic diseases like inflammatory bowel diseases, Alzheimer's, rheumatoid arthritis as well as common malignancies of the colon, stomach, lung, breast, and skin. Modern day drugs generally have unwanted side effects, which led to the current trend to use naturally occurring products with therapeutic properties. In the present review, the objective is to systematically analyze the wealth of information regarding the potential mechanisms of action and the medical use of saffron, the "golden spice", especially in digestive diseases. We summarized saffron influence on microbiome, molecular pathways, and inflammation in gastric, colon, liver cancers, and associated inflammations.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; colitis; colon; gastritis; gastrointestinal diseases; hepatitis: pancreatitis; inflammation; liver; microbiome; pancreas; saffron; stomach
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31027364 PMCID: PMC6567082 DOI: 10.3390/nu11050943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Primary and secondary outcome measurements for the treatment with Saffron vs. Fluoxetine.
| Questionnaire | Weeks into Treatment | Treatment Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saffron | Fluoxetine | ||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| IBS-Qol | Baseline | 60.00 | 9.15 | 59.18 | 7.28 | ||
| 2 weeks | 60.61 | 8.07 | 0.033 | 59.27 | 6.21 | 0.753 | |
| 4 weeks | 62.36 | 7.27 | <0.001 | 61.33 | 6.74 | <0.001 | |
| 6 weeks | 68.06 | 7.00 | <0.001 | 67.36 | 7.58 | <0.001 | |
| HADS-Depression domain | Baseline | 7.48 | 1.80 | 7.88 | 1.85 | ||
| 2 weeks | 7.36 | 1.52 | 0.525 | 7.45 | 1.64 | <0.001 | |
| 4 weeks | 6.58 | 1.23 | <0.001 | 6.76 | 1.12 | <0.001 | |
| 6 weeks | 5.91 | 0.98 | <0.001 | 6.21 | 0.86 | <0.001 | |
| HADS-Anxiety domain | Baseline | 7.27 | 1.72 | 7.45 | 1.60 | ||
| 2 weeks | 7.03 | 1.76 | 0.058 | 7.61 | 1.34 | 0.201 | |
| 4 weeks | 6.79 | 1.62 | 0.001 | 7.39 | 1.30 | 0.690 | |
| 6 weeks | 6.55 | 1.50 | <0.001 | 6.94 | 0.90 | 0.019 | |
SD = standard deviation, IBS = irritable bowel syndrome, QoL = quality of life, HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale * p-values are for paired sample t-tests comparing values to their baseline amount.
Effects of saffron on liver and colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines and mechanisms of action.
| Types of Cancers | Cell Lines/Animal Model | Mechanism of Action | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colon Cancer | HCT116 | Induction of Apoptosis | [ |
| HCT116, SW480, and HT29 | Induction of cytotoxicity and Inhibition of cell proliferation | [ | |
| Liver Cancer | HPG2 | Induction of cytotoxicity and Inhibition of cell proliferation | [ |
| HPG2 | Induction of Apoptosis | [ |
Molecular mechanisms by which extracts of saffron exert anti-cancer activity in GI cancers.
| Type of Cancer | Secondary Metabolite | Mechanism of Action | Molecular Changes | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hepatic Cancer | crocin | Apoptosis | Down-regulation of hTERT gene Down-regulation of the expression of catalytic subunit of enzyme telomerase | [ |
| Anti-oxidant property | Increased the levels of GST, SOD, and CAT | |||
| Pancreatic Cancer | crocetin | Cell cycle arrest at G2/M Phase | Reduced expression of Cdc-2 | [ |
| crocin, crocetin | Apoptosis | Increased expression of Bax protein | [ | |
| crocetin | Inhibition of cell proliferation | Reduced activity of EGFR | [ | |
| Colorectal Cancer | crocetin | Cell cycle arrest at S Phase | Reduced expression of cyclin A and cdk2 | [ |
| crocin | Cell cycle arrest at G3 phase | Decrease in the levels of cyclin B1 and pH3 | [ | |
| Crocin, crocetin | Apoptosis | Augmented expression of p53 and P21 | [ | |
| crocin | DNA Damage | Up-regulation of H2AX | [ | |
| Autophagolysis | Formation of LC3-II Decrease in protein levels of Beclin 1 and Atg 7 genes | [ | ||
| Gastric Cancer | crocin | Apoptosis | Activation of caspases | [ |
GST: Glutathione S-transferases, SOD: Superoxide dismutase, CAT: Catalase, EGFR: Epidermal growth factor receptor.
Figure 1Crocus sativus extract affects the cell cycle by blocking the G2 and S phase via p53 and CyclinB-cdk2 proteins. Cancer cells with p53 loss of function have a dysfunctional G1/S checkpoint whereas the G2/M checkpoint may still be functional. When cells are exposed to saffron extract, it causes G1/S arrest via activation of the p53 pathway while G2/M arrest by inhibiting CyclinB−cdk2 (cyclin-dependent kinases), provoking apoptosis of cancer cells. p53 also leads to increasing the Bax and decreasing Bcl2 expression which leads to morphological changes that contributes to apoptosis.
Figure 2Mitochondrial activation of the intrinsic pathway involves the inhibition Bcl2. Cytochrome C leaking out from the mitochondria to form the complex-apoptosome, composed of caspase-9 and Apaf-1, which activates the executor caspases 3, 6, and 7. Extrinsic route implies the activation of a death receptor in the cytoplasmic membrane by means of a ligand which activates the initiator caspase-8, followed by the executor caspases 3, 6, and 7. The activation of the executor caspases causes morphological changes related to the apoptotic process.
Figure 3Apoptosis, inflammation, and proliferation alteration by Saffron in liver cells. Both cell lines and animal model data indicate that TNFα receptor alters in Kupper cells. This results in suppression of NF-κB signaling via suppressing the level of iNOS, COX-2, and IL-8. Cell cycle arrest caused by saffron via caspases activation (Figure modified from Amin et al., 2011 [45]).
Figure 4Effect of saffron on the gut microbiome composition. Rats were given saffron in their drinking water (~120 mg/day). Stool samples were collected before and after 4 weeks and stool DNA extracts were used to analyze the gut microbiome structure and changes in the two groups (Control group which drank plain water and case group fed saffron). Ten stool samples from each of the two groups were used to extract DNA samples for bacterial community analysis. A PCR amplification targeting the 16S rRNA gene using universal bacterial primers was performed and the PCR products were sequenced. Treatment with saffron led to major changes at the phylum level. (A) Average abundance of different microbiomes before and after saffron treatment in rats. Treatment with saffron led to major changes at the phylum level. Red bars indicate bacterial phyla in untreated while the green bars show the prevalence of different phyla in saffron treated rats. A dramatic reduction of Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria and a less dramatic decrease in Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla within the saffron treated rats was noticed. These reductions were accompanied by an enrichment in Spirochaetes, Tenericutes, and Candidatus saccharri bacteria. (B). Linear discrimination analysis (LDA) of Operation Taxonomy Units (OTUs) (Species) indicates major changes in the gut microbiome as a result of saffron treatment: Green bars indicate the discriminant OTUs in untreated while the red bars show the discriminant OTUs in saffron treated rats. (C). Magnification of the discriminant OTUs in the rat gut microbiome from (B) (brackets). Green bars show that top discriminant OTUs in saffron treated rats while red bars show discriminant OTUs in untreated rats. Top discriminant OTUs in treated rats were from the Bacteroides to Lactobacilli strains while top discriminant OTUs in untreated rats were from the Clostridiales to Lachnoclostridiale strains. (D). Penetrance of bacterial composition changes as a result of saffron treatment in rats. From Inner to Outer: Phyla to Species. Green or red lines stemming from the center of the cladogram reflect higher penetrance changes as a result of saffron treatment.