| Literature DB >> 33954178 |
Yoshiko Hada1,2, Haruhito A Uchida1,2, Jun Wada1.
Abstract
Several studies have reported the efficacy and safety of polyphenols in human health; however, the verification of their efficacy remains insufficient. The aim of this study was to examine whether fisetin, one of flavonoids prevalently present in fruits and vegetables, could suppress lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) induced inflammatory responses in macrophages. LPS increased proinflammatory mRNA abundance (MCP 1, IL-1β, and iNOS) but were suppressed by fisetin. The increment of nitric oxide by LPS, an oxidative stress factor, was attenuated by fisetin. In addition, LPS-enhanced phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK and JNK) was reduced. Finally, fisetin attenuated the expression or activity of uPA, uPAR, MMP-2, and MMP-9, which are known as associated factors of macrophage recruitment or infiltration. In conclusion, fisetin is a promising therapeutic agent for macrophage-related inflammation diseases, like sepsis and atherosclerosis.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33954178 PMCID: PMC8057890 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5570885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Effects of fisetin on the expression of inflammatory mediators in macrophages stimulated with LPS. (a) mRNA expression of MCP-1, IL-1β, and iNOS in LPS- (10 ng/mL) stimulated macrophages in the presence or absence of fisetin (10-100 μM) by qPCR (n = 6 in each group). Each bar presents the mean + SE of six experiments. ∗p < 0.05 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 vs. LPS-stimulated group. (b) NO concentration in each cell culture supernatants by colorimetric assay (n = 3 in each group). Each bar presents the mean + SE of three experiments. ∗p < 0.05 vs. control; #p < 0.05 vs. LPS.
Figure 2Effects of fisetin on the protein expression of MAPKs in macrophages stimulated with LPS. (a) Protein expression of MAPK in LPS- (10 ng/mL) stimulated macrophages for 0-60-minute incubation (n = 3 in each group). (b) Protein expression of MAPK in LPS- (10 ng/mL) stimulated macrophages in the presence or absence of fisetin (100 μM) by western blotting (n = 3 in each group). (c) The relative expression of each protein was quantified by densitometry and normalized to the band under the control condition. Each bar presents the mean + SE of three experiments. ∗p < 0.05.
Figure 3Effects of fisetin on the protein expression of uPA and uPAR in macrophages stimulated with LPS. (a) Protein expression of uPA in LPS- (10 ng/mL) stimulated macrophages in the presence or absence of fisetin (100 μM) by western blotting. The relative expression of each protein was quantified by densitometry and normalized to the band under the control condition (n = 3 in each group). Each bar presents the mean + SE of three experiments. ∗p < 0.05. (b) Protein expression of uPAR in LPS- (10 ng/mL) stimulated macrophages in the presence or absence of fisetin (100 μM) by western blotting. The relative expression of each protein was quantified by densitometry and normalized to the band under the control condition (n = 3 in each group). Each bar presents the mean + SE of three experiments. ∗p < 0.05.
Figure 4Effects of fisetin on MMP-2 and MMP-9 in macrophages stimulated with LPS. (a) mRNA expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in LPS- (10 ng/mL) stimulated macrophages in the presence or absence of fisetin (10-100 μM) by qPCR (n = 6 in each group). Each bar presents the mean + SE of six experiments. ∗p < 0.05 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 vs. LPS-stimulated group. (b) The activation of MMP-9 in LPS- (10 ng/mL) stimulated macrophages in the presence or absence of fisetin (10-100 μM) by gelatin zymography. The relative expression of MMP-9 activity was quantified by densitometry and normalized to the band under the control condition (n = 3 in each group). Each bar presents the mean + SE of three experiments. ∗p < 0.05.