Literature DB >> 19800958

Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability.

Kelly C Harris1, Mark A Eckert, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno.   

Abstract

Differences in gap detection for younger and older adults have been shown to vary with the complexity of the task or stimuli, but the factors that contribute to these differences remain unknown. To address this question, we examined the extent to which age-related differences in processing speed and workload predicted age-related differences in gap detection. Gap detection thresholds were measured for 10 younger and 11 older adults in two conditions that varied in task complexity but used identical stimuli: (1) gap location fixed at the beginning, middle, or end of a noise burst and (2) gap location varied randomly from trial to trial from the beginning, middle, or end of the noise. We hypothesized that gap location uncertainty would place increased demands on cognitive and attentional resources and result in significantly higher gap detection thresholds for older but not younger adults. Overall, gap detection thresholds were lower for the middle location as compared to beginning and end locations and were lower for the fixed than the random condition. In general, larger age-related differences in gap detection were observed for more challenging conditions. That is, gap detection thresholds for older adults were significantly larger for the random condition than for the fixed condition when the gap was at the beginning and end locations but not the middle. In contrast, gap detection thresholds for younger adults were not significantly different for the random and fixed condition at any location. Subjective ratings of workload indicated that older adults found the gap detection task more mentally demanding than younger adults. Consistent with these findings, results of the Purdue Pegboard and Connections tests revealed age-related slowing of processing speed. Moreover, age group differences in workload and processing speed predicted gap detection in younger and older adults when gap location varied from trial to trial; these associations were not observed when gap location remained constant across trials. Taken together, these results suggest that age-related differences in complex measures of auditory temporal processing may be explained, in part, by age-related deficits in processing speed and attention. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19800958      PMCID: PMC2868108          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  54 in total

1.  Age-related changes in temporal resolution: envelope and intensity effects.

Authors:  B Schneider; F Speranza; M K Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1998-12

2.  Temporal resolution in young and elderly subjects as measured by mismatch negativity and a psychoacoustic gap detection task.

Authors:  Sibylle Bertoli; Jacek Smurzynski; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Age-related alterations in the neural coding of envelope periodicities.

Authors:  Joseph P Walton; Henry Simon; Robert D Frisina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by elderly subjects with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  B C Moore; R W Peters; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Wesley Clapp; Jon Kelley; Kevin McEvoy; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Attention and mismatch negativity.

Authors:  R Näätänen; P Paavilainen; H Tiitinen; D Jiang; K Alho
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The Mini-Mental State Examination.

Authors:  M F Folstein; L N Robins; J E Helzer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1983-07

9.  Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Richard A Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults.

Authors:  B A Schneider; M K Pichora-Fuller; D Kowalchuk; M Lamb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  36 in total

1.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of Aging on Perceptual and Electrophysiological Responses to Acoustic Pulse Trains as a Function of Rate.

Authors:  Casey Gaskins; Brittany N Jaekel; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

4.  Age-related deficits in auditory temporal processing: unique contributions of neural dyssynchrony and slowed neuronal processing.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Sara Wilson; Mark A Eckert; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

Review 8.  Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Boris Gourévitch; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Tiziana Vercillo; Alexis Nicholson; Michael Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

10.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.