Literature DB >> 31024081

Cancer overdiagnosis: a biological challenge and clinical dilemma.

Sudhir Srivastava1, Eugene J Koay2, Alexander D Borowsky3, Angelo M De Marzo4, Sharmistha Ghosh5, Paul D Wagner5, Barnett S Kramer5.   

Abstract

For cancer screening to be successful, it should primarily detect cancers with lethal potential or their precursors early, leading to therapy that reduces mortality and morbidity. Screening programmes have been successful for colon and cervical cancers, where subsequent surgical removal of precursor lesions has resulted in a reduction in cancer incidence and mortality. However, many types of cancer exhibit a range of heterogeneous behaviours and variable likelihoods of progression and death. Consequently, screening for some cancers may have minimal impact on mortality and may do more harm than good. Since the implementation of screening tests for certain cancers (for example, breast and prostate cancers), a spike in incidence of in situ and early-stage cancers has been observed, but a link to reduction in cancer-specific mortality has not been as clear. It is difficult to determine how many of these mortality reductions are due to screening and how many are due to improved treatments of tumours. In cancers with lower incidence but high mortality (for example, pancreatic cancer), screening has focused on high-risk populations, but challenges similar to those for general population screening remain, particularly with regard to finding lesions with difficult-to-characterize malignant potential (for example, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms). More sensitive screening methods are detecting smaller and smaller lesions, but this has not been accompanied by a comparable reduction in the incidence of invasive cancers. In this Opinion article, we focus on the contribution of screening in general and high-risk populations to overdiagnosis, the effects of overdiagnosis on patients and emerging strategies to reduce overdiagnosis of indolent cancers through an understanding of tumour heterogeneity, the biology of how cancers evolve and progress, the molecular and cellular features of early neoplasia and the dynamics of the interactions of early lesions with their surrounding tissue microenvironment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31024081      PMCID: PMC8819710          DOI: 10.1038/s41568-019-0142-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer        ISSN: 1474-175X            Impact factor:   60.716


  118 in total

Review 1.  Overdiagnosis in cancer.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; William C Black
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The polyp detection rate of colonoscopy: a national study of Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Amitabh Chak; Siran Koroukian
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy S Atkin; Rob Edwards; Ines Kralj-Hans; Kate Wooldrage; Andrew R Hart; John M A Northover; D Max Parkin; Jane Wardle; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  New diagnostic tests: more harm than good.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-07-18

5.  Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Robert E Schoen; Paul F Pinsky; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Timothy Church; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Robert Bresalier; Gerald L Andriole; Saundra S Buys; E David Crawford; Mona N Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Christine C Johnson; Douglas J Reding; Barbara O'Brien; Danielle M Carrick; Patrick Wright; Thomas L Riley; Mark P Purdue; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony B Miller; John K Gohagan; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Margaret A Piper; Leslie A Perdue; Carolyn M Rutter; Elizabeth M Webber; Elizabeth O'Connor; Ning Smith; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; B Dustin Pooler; J Louis Hinshaw; Duncan Barlow; Don Jensen; Mark Reichelderfer; Brooks D Cash
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Ian M Thompson; Brian Reid; Peter Nelson; David F Ransohoff; H Gilbert Welch; Shelley Hwang; Donald A Berry; Kenneth W Kinzler; William C Black; Mina Bissell; Howard Parnes; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype.

Authors:  Yiwey Shieh; Martin Eklund; George F Sawaya; William C Black; Barnett S Kramer; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Francesca Pesola; Alejandra Castañón; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  56 in total

1.  Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention.

Authors:  Anne Marie Lennon; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac Kinde; Andrew Warren; Ashley Honushefsky; Ariella T Cohain; David H Ledbetter; Fred Sanfilippo; Kathleen Sheridan; Dillenia Rosica; Christian S Adonizio; Hee Jung Hwang; Kamel Lahouel; Joshua D Cohen; Christopher Douville; Aalpen A Patel; Leonardo N Hagmann; David D Rolston; Nirav Malani; Shibin Zhou; Chetan Bettegowda; David L Diehl; Bobbi Urban; Christopher D Still; Lisa Kann; Julie I Woods; Zachary M Salvati; Joseph Vadakara; Rosemary Leeming; Prianka Bhattacharya; Carroll Walter; Alex Parker; Christoph Lengauer; Alison Klein; Cristian Tomasetti; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Disparities in Cancer Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  John M Carethers; Rajarshi Sengupta; Rea Blakey; Antoni Ribas; Gypsyamber D'Souza
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-09-17

3.  Breast Cancer Screening Trials: Endpoints and Overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Liquid Biopsies: Flowing Biomarkers.

Authors:  Vincent Hyenne; Jacky G Goetz; Naël Osmani
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  Overdiagnosis in urologic cancer : For World Journal of Urology Symposium on active surveillance in prostate and renal cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Extracellular vesicles in prostate cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Koji Hatano; Kazutoshi Fujita
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

7.  Updated Trends in Cancer in Japan: Incidence in 1985-2015 and Mortality in 1958-2018-A Sign of Decrease in Cancer Incidence.

Authors:  Kota Katanoda; Megumi Hori; Eiko Saito; Akiko Shibata; Yuri Ito; Tetsuji Minami; Sayaka Ikeda; Tatsuya Suzuki; Tomohiro Matsuda
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.211

8.  Early Detection Initiative: A randomized controlled trial of algorithm-based screening in patients with new onset hyperglycemia and diabetes for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Suresh T Chari; Anirban Maitra; Lynn M Matrisian; Eva E Shrader; Bechien U Wu; Avinash Kambadakone; Ying-Qi Zhao; Barbara Kenner; Jo Ann S Rinaudo; Sudhir Srivastava; Ying Huang; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 9.  Impact of posttranslational modifications in pancreatic carcinogenesis and treatments.

Authors:  Nianhong Chen; Qiaoqiao Zheng; Guoqing Wan; Feng Guo; Xiaobin Zeng; Ping Shi
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 9.264

10.  PolyG-DS: An ultrasensitive polyguanine tract-profiling method to detect clonal expansions and trace cell lineage.

Authors:  Yuezheng Zhang; Brendan F Kohrn; Ming Yang; Daniela Nachmanson; T Rinda Soong; I-Hsiu Lee; Yong Tao; Hans Clevers; Elizabeth M Swisher; Teresa A Brentnall; Lawrence A Loeb; Scott R Kennedy; Jesse J Salk; Kamila Naxerova; Rosa Ana Risques
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.