Literature DB >> 16378787

The polyp detection rate of colonoscopy: a national study of Medicare beneficiaries.

Gregory S Cooper1, Amitabh Chak, Siran Koroukian.   

Abstract

National-level data on the proportion of colonoscopies in routine practice that result in polyp detection are limited. Our goal was to determine the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy among population subgroups. We reviewed Medicare claims data for all fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years or older who underwent colonoscopy in 1999. With the use of diagnosis and procedure codes, the proportion of procedures with polyps was estimated. Three different criteria for polyp detection were used. Approximately 1.8 million colonoscopy procedures were identified. Depending on the specific criteria used, 23.9% to 35.7% of examinations noted polyps. The detection rate was highest in younger patients, men, and whites. The apparent yield of colonoscopy in terms of polyp detection is at least 24%. These data may be informative in predicting resource allocation for therapeutic procedures associated with colonoscopy. Future studies should determine the use and yield of serial colonoscopies for polyp surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16378787     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

1.  Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Joan L Warren; Michael J Barrett; Therese A Stukel; V Paul Doria-Rose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Colonoscopy screening in African Americans and Whites with affected first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Neeraja B Peterson; Jay H Fowke; Margaret Hargreaves; Lisa B Signorello; Robert S Dittus; Wei Zheng; William J Blot
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-24

3.  Screening polypectomy rates below quality benchmarks: a prospective study.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Mengzhu Jiang; Mélanie Fon Sing; Alan Barkun; Lawrence Joseph
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Impact of Salvage Surgery following Colonic Endoscopic Polypectomy for Patients with Invasive Neoplasia.

Authors:  Xiangzhou Tan; Markus Quante; Zihua Chen; Zhikang Chen; Alfred Königsrainer; Dörte Wichmann
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Karla Lindquist; Sean Nugent; Tammy Schult; Sei J Lee; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Cancer overdiagnosis: a biological challenge and clinical dilemma.

Authors:  Sudhir Srivastava; Eugene J Koay; Alexander D Borowsky; Angelo M De Marzo; Sharmistha Ghosh; Paul D Wagner; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Colonoscopy practice in lagos, Nigeria: a report of an audit.

Authors:  C A Onyekwere; J N Odiagah; O O Ogunleye; C Chibututu; O A Lesi
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2013-02-27

8.  Mean Polyp per Patient Is an Accurate and Readily Obtainable Surrogate for Adenoma Detection Rate: Results from an Opportunistic Screening Colonoscopy Program.

Authors:  Alireza Delavari; Hamideh Salimzadeh; Faraz Bishehsari; Elham Sobh Rakhshankhah; Farnaz Delavari; Shirin Moossavi; Pejman Khosravi; Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam; Shahin Merat; Reza Ansari; Homayoon Vahedi; Bijan Shahbazkhani; Mehdi Saberifiroozi; Masoud Sotoudeh; Reza Malekzadeh
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2015-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.