Literature DB >> 31022561

Dissociating the impact of attention and expectation on early sensory processing.

Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana1, John T Serences2.   

Abstract

Most studies that focus on understanding how top-down knowledge influences behavior attempt to manipulate either 'attention' or 'expectation' and often use the terms interchangeably. However, having expectations about statistical regularities in the environment and the act of willfully allocating attention to a subset of relevant sensory inputs are logically distinct processes that could, in principle, rely on similar neural mechanisms and influence information processing at the same stages. In support of this framework, several recent studies attempted to isolate expectation from attention, and advanced the idea that expectation and attention both modulate early sensory processing. Here, we argue that there is currently insufficient empirical evidence to support this conclusion, because previous studies have not fully isolated the effects of expectation and attention. Instead, most prior studies manipulated the relevance of different sensory features, and as a result, few existing findings speak directly to the potentially separable influences of expectation and attention on early sensory processing. Indeed, recent studies that attempt to more strictly isolate expectation and attention suggest that expectation has little influence on early sensory responses and primarily influences later 'decisional' stages of information processing.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31022561      PMCID: PMC6756985          DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol        ISSN: 2352-250X


  66 in total

1.  Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Scott O Murray; Daniel Kersten; Bruno A Olshausen; Paul Schrater; David L Woods
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis; Andrew Culberson; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Mechanisms of feature- and space-based attention: response modulation and baseline increases.

Authors:  Stephanie A McMains; Hilda M Fehd; Tatiana-Aloi Emmanouil; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Category expectation modulates baseline and stimulus-evoked activity in human inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Amrita M Puri; Ewa Wojciulik; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability.

Authors:  M A Basso; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Searching for objects in real-world scences.

Authors:  I Biederman; A L Glass; E W Stacy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-01

7.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; C T Ames; D T Lindsey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Expectations Do Not Alter Early Sensory Processing during Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana; Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Annalisa Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Local expectation violations result in global activity gain in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Lieke L F van Lieshout; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation.

Authors:  Hanneke E M den Ouden; Peter Kok; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-11
View more
  7 in total

1.  Oculomotor freezing indicates conscious detection free of decision bias.

Authors:  Alex L White; James C Moreland; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A Stable Population Code for Attention in Prefrontal Cortex Leads a Dynamic Attention Code in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; Byron M Yu; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Oculomotor freezing reflects tactile temporal expectation and aids tactile perception.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Caroline F Myers; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Challenges to the Modularity Thesis Under the Bayesian Brain Models.

Authors:  Nithin George; Meera Mary Sunny
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Attention Control and Audiomotor Processes Underlying Anticipation of Musical Themes while Listening to Familiar Sonata-Form Pieces.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Li; Chen-Gia Tsai
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-13

7.  The time-course of feature-based attention effects dissociated from temporal expectation and target-related processes.

Authors:  Thomas A Carlson; Anina N Rich; Denise Moerel; Tijl Grootswagers; Amanda K Robinson; Sophia M Shatek; Alexandra Woolgar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.