Literature DB >> 34583956

A Stable Population Code for Attention in Prefrontal Cortex Leads a Dynamic Attention Code in Visual Cortex.

Adam C Snyder1, Byron M Yu2, Matthew A Smith3.   

Abstract

Attention often requires maintaining a stable mental state over time while simultaneously improving perceptual sensitivity. These requirements place conflicting demands on neural populations, as sensitivity implies a robust response to perturbation by incoming stimuli, which is antithetical to stability. Functional specialization of cortical areas provides one potential mechanism to resolve this conflict. We reasoned that attention signals in executive control areas might be highly stable over time, reflecting maintenance of the cognitive state, thereby freeing up sensory areas to be more sensitive to sensory input (i.e., unstable), which would be reflected by more dynamic attention signals in those areas. To test these predictions, we simultaneously recorded neural populations in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and visual cortical area V4 in rhesus macaque monkeys performing an endogenous spatial selective attention task. Using a decoding approach, we found that the neural code for attention states in PFC was substantially more stable over time compared with the attention code in V4 on a moment-by-moment basis, in line with our guiding thesis. Moreover, attention signals in PFC predicted the future attention state of V4 better than vice versa, consistent with a top-down role for PFC in attention. These results suggest a functional specialization of attention mechanisms across cortical areas with a division of labor. PFC signals the cognitive state and maintains this state stably over time, whereas V4 responds to sensory input in a manner dynamically modulated by that cognitive state.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Attention requires maintaining a stable mental state while simultaneously improving perceptual sensitivity. We hypothesized that these two demands (stability and sensitivity) are distributed between prefrontal and visual cortical areas, respectively. Specifically, we predicted attention signals in visual cortex would be less stable than in prefrontal cortex, and furthermore prefrontal cortical signals would predict attention signals in visual cortex in line with the hypothesized role of prefrontal cortex in top-down executive control. Our results are consistent with suggestions deriving from previous work using separate recordings in the two brain areas in different animals performing different tasks and represent the first direct evidence in support of this hypothesis with simultaneous multiarea recordings within individual animals.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; extrastriate; monkey; population; prefrontal; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34583956      PMCID: PMC8570836          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0608-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  72 in total

1.  Impact of expected reward on neuronal activity in prefrontal cortex, frontal and supplementary eye fields and premotor cortex.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention?

Authors:  John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Dynamics of motion signaling by neurons in macaque area MT.

Authors:  Matthew A Smith; Najib J Majaj; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference.

Authors:  Lionel Barnett; Anil K Seth
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Cortical information flow during flexible sensorimotor decisions.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ready, set, reset: stimulus-locked periodicity in behavioral performance demonstrates the consequences of cross-sensory phase reset.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Manuel R Mercier; Adam C Snyder; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Modulation of microsaccades in monkey during a covert visual attention task.

Authors:  Ziad M Hafed; Lee P Lovejoy; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A hierarchy of intrinsic timescales across primate cortex.

Authors:  John D Murray; Alberto Bernacchia; David J Freedman; Ranulfo Romo; Jonathan D Wallis; Xinying Cai; Camillo Padoa-Schioppa; Tatiana Pasternak; Hyojung Seo; Daeyeol Lee; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Stable and Dynamic Coding for Working Memory in Primate Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Eelke Spaak; Kei Watanabe; Shintaro Funahashi; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The mediodorsal pulvinar coordinates the macaque fronto-parietal network during rhythmic spatial attention.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; Mark A Pinsk; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dynamic and stable population coding of attentional instructions coexist in the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Panagiotis Sapountzis; Sofia Paneri; Sotirios Papadopoulos; Georgia G Gregoriou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Tasks activating the default mode network map multiple functional systems.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mancuso; Sara Cavuoti-Cabanillas; Donato Liloia; Jordi Manuello; Giulia Buzi; Franco Cauda; Tommaso Costa
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.748

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.