Literature DB >> 16627145

Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years.

Douglas P McInnis1, Geoffrey Horne, Peter A Devane.   

Abstract

Fluted tapered revision femoral stems have been used successfully in Europe. Modularity makes these implants more versatile, but outcomes of modular designs have not been reported. We report a retrospective review of 70 such stems with a mean follow-up of 47 months. Combined metaphyseal/diaphyseal bone loss was present preoperatively in 36 (51%) of 70 hips. Three hips (4.3%) were re-revised or in need of re-revision, and worst-case survival was 87%. The mean postoperative patient-assessed Oxford Hip Score was 21.1. Restoration of proximal bone was noted in 56%. Complications included mean subsidence of 9.9 mm, dislocation in 7 (10%) of 70 hips, and fracture or cortical perforation in 17 (24.2%) of 70. These results are equivalent to, or better than, reported results of other types of cementless revision femoral stems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627145     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  27 in total

Review 1.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs.

Authors:  Corey J Richards; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  CORR Insights®: modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications.

Authors:  Curtis W Hartman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Letter to the Editor: Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Management bone loss of the proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty: Update on reconstructive options.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; George C Babis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

6.  Revision hip arthroplasty with a rectangular tapered cementless stem: a retrospective study of the SLR-Plus stem at a mean follow-up of 4.1 years.

Authors:  Iker Uriarte; Jesús Moreta; Laura Cortés; Lucía Bernuy; Urko Aguirre; José Luis Martínez de Los Mozos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-10-15

7.  A new technique of endoprosthetic replacement for osteosarcoma of proximal femur with intra-articular extension.

Authors:  E Oragui; M Nannaparaju; K Sri-Ram; W Khan; A Hashemi-Nejad; J Skinner
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2012-10-13

8.  Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg; Natalie D Ommen; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.