| Literature DB >> 31011231 |
Casper Reijnen1,2, Willem Jan van Weelden3, Martijn S J P Arts4, Johan P Peters4, Paul F Rijken4, Koen van de Vijver5, Maria Santacana6, Peter Bronsert7, Johan Bulten8, Marc Hirschfeld9,10, Eva Colas11, Antonio Gil-Moreno11,12, Armando Reques13, Gemma Mancebo14, Camilla Krakstad15,16, Jone Trovik15, Ingfrid S Haldorsen16,17, Jutta Huvila18, Martin Koskas19, Vit Weinberger20, Lubos Minar20, Eva Jandakova21, Marc P L M Snijders22, Saskia van den Berg-van Erp23, Heidi V N Küsters-Vandevelde23, Xavier Matias-Guiu6, Frederic Amant24,25, Leon F A G Massuger3, Johan Bussink4, Johanna M A Pijnenborg3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients at high risk of recurrence is lacking. In this study, the prognostic role of hypoxia and angiogenesis was investigated in EC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31011231 PMCID: PMC6738053 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0461-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Fig. 1Example of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) and CD34 staining in endometrial cancer. a Nuclear 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (blue) for visualisation of tumour nuclei. b CAIX staining (green) adjusted for total tumour area, meaning that only epithelial tumour cells were included in the analysis: other tissue, including stroma, necrosis and vasculature has manually been removed and is coloured black by the analysis software (see “Methods” section). c CD34 staining of vasculature (red) with three hotspots according to the Weidner method, marked with the interrupted lines. d Combined CAIX staining and CD34 staining. e–h represent representative high-magnification images of the boxed areas in a, b, c and d, respectively. Scale bar = 0.5 mm
Baseline characteristics of all included patients, associated with CAIX combined with vascular density
| Variable | All ( | Not CAIX >1% and high vascular density ( | CAIX >1% and high vascular density ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)a | 64.0 (34.0–89.0) | 64.3 (34.0–89.0) | 63.5 (43.0–88.0) | 0.634 |
| Follow-up (months)a | 65.1 (0.0–156.0) | 63.8 (0.0–156.0) | 71.6 (0–148.0) | 0.125 |
| Grade | ||||
| Low | 318 (82.6) | 270 (83.9) | 48 (76.2) | 0.142 |
| High | 67 (17.4) | 52 (16.1) | 15 (23.8) | |
| Histology | ||||
| EEC | 372 (96.6) | 314 (97.5) | 58 (92.1) | 0.028 |
| NEEC | 13 (3.4) | 8 (2.5) | 5 (7.9) | |
| FIGO stage | ||||
| I–II | 363 (93.8) | 305 (94.7) | 58 (92.1) | 0.406 |
| III–IV | 22 (5.7) | 17 (5.3) | 5 (7.9) | |
| Myometrial invasion | ||||
| <50% | 258 (67.2) | 218 (67.9) | 40 (63.5) | 0.494 |
| ≥50% | 126 (32.8) | 103 (32.1) | 23 (36.5) | |
| LVSIb | ||||
| No | 243 (62.8) | 200 (90.1) | 43 (84.3) | 0.234 |
| Yes | 30 (7.8) | 22 (9.9) | 8 (15.7) | |
| Lymph nodesc | ||||
| No metastasis | 263 (68.0) | 223 (95.7) | 40 (95.2) | 0.891 |
| Metastasis | 12 (3.1) | 10 (4.3) | 2 (4.8) | |
| Adjuvant treatment | ||||
| No | 154 (40.0) | 143 (44.8) | 22 (34.9) | |
| Radiotherapy | 200 (51.9) | 161 (50.0) | 39 (61.9) | 0.084 |
| Chemotherapy | 31 (8.1) | 18 (5.6) | 2 (3.2) | 0.429 |
| Recurrence | ||||
| No | 338 (87.8) | 289 (89.8) | 49 (77.8) | |
| Yes | 47 (12.2) | 33 (10.2) | 14 (22.2) | 0.008 |
| Local | 14 (3.6) | 12 (3.7) | 2 (3.2) | 0.830 |
| Regional | 16 (4.2) | 13 (4.0) | 3 (4.8) | 0.792 |
| Distant | 31 (8.1) | 19 (5.9) | 12 (19.0) | <0.001 |
| Death | ||||
| No | 335 (87.0) | 284 (88.2) | 49 (77.8) | |
| Yes | 50 (13.0) | 38 (11.8) | 14 (22.2) | 0.027 |
| EC-related | 21 (5.5) | 12 (3.7) | 11 (17.5) | <0.001 |
CAIX carbonic anhydrase IX, EEC endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, NEEC non-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, FIGO International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, LVSI lymphovascular space invasion, EC endometrial carcinoma
*P value of the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous, and χ2 test and Fisher’s exact for categorical variables
aMedian values (range)
bBased on 273 patients
cBased on 275 patients
Fig. 2Disease-specific survival (DSS) by carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) expression combined with degree of angiogenesis. Log-rank test was used to compare groups
Fig. 3Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of clinicopathological parameters including carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) combined with vascular density for disease-specific survival (DSS). The hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals are depicted by the black line. All risk factors significantly associated with DSS in univariable analysis were included in the multivariable Cox regression analysis, depicted by the grey lines
Fig. 4Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of clinicopathological parameters including carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) combined with vascular density for disease-free survival (DFS). All risk factors significantly associated with DFS in univariable analysis were included in the multivariable Cox regression analysis, depicted by the grey lines
Fig. 5Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of clinicopathological parameters including carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) combined with vascular density for distant disease-free survival (DDFS). All risk factors significantly associated with DDFS in univariable analysis were included in the multivariable Cox regression analysis, depicted by the grey lines