| Literature DB >> 12865916 |
P N Span1, J Bussink, P Manders, L V A M Beex, C G J Sweep.
Abstract
Here, we set out to assess CA9 expression levels by real-time quantitative RT-PCR in breast cancer tissue samples obtained from 253 patients, and correlated those with relapse-free (RFS) survival. The median follow-up time was 75 months (range 2-168 months). CA9 expression was mainly found in high-grade, steroid receptor negative cancer tissues. CA9 levels were not significantly associated with RFS (P=0.926, hazard ratio (HR)=0.99, 95% CI=0.80-1.22) in the total cohort of 253 patients. In multivariate analysis with other clinicopathological factors, CA9 (P=0.018, HR=0.77, 95% CI=0.62-0.96), the interaction of adjuvant chemotherapy with CA9 (P=0.009, HR=1.31, 95% CI=1.07-1.61) and the interaction of adjuvant endocrine therapy with CA9 (P<0.001, HR=1.41, 95% CI=1.20-1.66) all contributed significantly to the final model. These results indicate that patients with low CA9 levels benefit more from adjuvant treatment than do patients with high levels. Thus, the determination of CA9 levels could aid in the selection of patients who will not benefit from adjuvant therapy, and whose prognosis will more likely improve with other treatment modalities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12865916 PMCID: PMC2394253 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Photomicrograph at X200 magnification illustrating the spatial relationship between CA IX (anti-human G250, red) and tumour vasculature (anti-CD34 staining, brown). Nuclei appear as magenta blue (haematoxylin).
Figure 2Distribution of CA9 levels in human breast cancer: six tumour samples were found to be CA9 negative. The other 247 samples exhibited a basically log-normal distribution of CA9 levels.
Categorical distributions of baseline characteristics of patients and CA9/β-actin levels
| Age (years) | ||||
| <50 | 57 | 22.5 | 1.3 (8.8) | |
| ⩾50 | 196 | 77.5 | 1.6 (6.8) | 0.656 |
| Nodal status | ||||
| Negative | 103 | 40.7 | 1.0 (7.2) | |
| 1–3 nodes | 78 | 30.8 | 1.6 (6.2) | |
| ⩾4 nodes | 44 | 17.4 | 1.3 (7.9) | 0.624 |
| Menopausal status | ||||
| Premenopausal | 64 | 25.3 | 1.3 (8.7) | |
| Postmenopausal | 189 | 74.7 | 1.6 (6.7) | 0.878 |
| Tumour size | ||||
| pT1 | 66 | 26.1 | 1.2 (7.0) | |
| pT2 | 137 | 54.2 | 1.5 (5.8) | |
| pT3+pT4 | 46 | 18.2 | 3.0 (1.6) | 0.611 |
| Histological grade | ||||
| I/II | 84 | 33.2 | 1.1 (2.7) | |
| III | 86 | 34.0 | 4.2 (18) | |
| Unknown | 83 | 32.8 | 1.8 (6.6) | 0.009 |
| ER (fmol mg−1 protein) | ||||
| <10 | 88 | 34.8 | 7.2 (27) | |
| ⩾10 | 161 | 63.6 | 0.82 (2.7) | <0.001 |
| PgR (fmol mg−1 protein) | ||||
| <10 | 103 | 40.7 | 6.2 (23) | |
| ⩾10 | 147 | 58.1 | 0.84 (3.1) | <0.001 |
| Surgery | ||||
| Mastectomy | 183 | 72.3 | 1.5 (6.9) | |
| Breast-saving procedure | 70 | 27.7 | 1.2 (7.1) | 0.902 |
| Adjuvant radiotherapy | ||||
| None | 68 | 26.9 | 1.3 (6.6) | |
| Any | 184 | 72.7 | 1.5 (7.4) | 0.822 |
| Adjuvant systemic therapy | ||||
| None | 126 | 49.8 | 1.7 (8.2) | |
| Endocrine | 85 | 33.6 | 1.5 (5.3) | |
| Chemo | 28 | 11.1 | 1.0 (5.6) | |
| Both | 14 | 5.5 | 2.8 (15) | 0.735 |
Owing to missing values data do not always add up to 253.
All patients with uncertain number of involved lymph nodes are node positive.
P for Mann–Whitney U test.
P for Kruskal–Wallis test.
Univariate Cox regression analysis of prognostic value of clinicopathological factors and CA9 expression for RFS
| Age (years) | ||
| <50 | 1.0 | |
| ⩾50 | 0.56 (0.35–0.91) | 0.018 |
| Nodal status | ||
| Negative | 1.0 | |
| 1–3 nodes | 1.97 (1.1–3.5) | |
| ⩾4 nodes | 4.23 (2.3–7.7) | <0.001 |
| Menopausal status | ||
| Premenopausal | ||
| Postmenopausal | 0.091 | |
| Tumour size | ||
| pT1 | 1.0 | |
| pT2 | 1.95 (1.1–3.6) | |
| pT3+pT4 | 2.90 (1.5–5.8) | 0.011 |
| Histological grade | ||
| I/II | 1.0 | |
| III | 2.24 (1.3–3.9) | |
| Unknown | 1.59 (0.8–2.9) | 0.018 |
| ER (fmol mg−1 protein) | ||
| <10 | ||
| ⩾10 | 0.297 | |
| PgR (fmol mg−1 protein) | ||
| <10 | ||
| ⩾10 | 0.485 | |
| Surgery | ||
| Mastectomy | ||
| Breast-saving procedure | 0.051 | |
| Adjuvant radiotherapy | ||
| None | ||
| Any | 0.114 | |
| Adjuvant systemic therapy | ||
| None | ||
| Endocrine | ||
| Chemo | ||
| Both | 0.680 | |
| 0.99 (0.80–1.22) | 0.926 |
Hazard ratio (95% CI).
Multivariatea Cox regression analysis
| Age (years) | 0.146 | |
| ⩾50 | 0.61 (0.31–1.19) | |
| Tumour size | 0.140 | |
| pT2 | 1.95 (0.98–3.86) | |
| pT3+4 | 1.96 (0.90–4.28) | |
| Histological grade | 0.019 | |
| III | 2.20 (1.21–4.03) | |
| No. of involved lymph nodes | <0.001 | |
| 1–3 | 6.27 (2.89–13.6) | |
| ⩾4 | 13.1 (6.12–27.9) | |
| ER status | 0.852 | |
| Positive | 1.08 (0.49–2.39) | |
| PgR status | 0.858 | |
| Positive | 0.96 (0.58–1.58) | |
| 0.018 | ||
| Log-transformed | 0.77 (0.62–0.96) | |
| Adjuvant radiotherapy | 0.128 | |
| Yes | 0.60 (0.31–1.16) | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.828 | |
| Yes | 0.76 (0.06–9.25) | |
| Adjuvant endocrine therapy | 0.889 | |
| Yes | 1.15 (0.17–7.96) | |
| Interaction, radiotherapy × | 0.624 | |
| Yes and log-transformed | 0.89 (0.54–1.44) | |
| Interaction, chemotherapy × | 0.009 | |
| Yes and log-transformed | 1.31 (1.07–1.61) | |
| Interaction, endocrine therapy × | <0.001 | |
| Yes and log-transformed | 1.41 (1.20–1.66) |
The analysis was conducted in two blocks. Firstly, a model including all established clinicopathological factors was fitted. In a second block, the contributions ofCA9 (as a continuous, log-transformed variable), treatment and interactions were investigated.
The final multivariate model included 220 patients.
Hazard ratio (95% CI) of multivariate analysis.
Cut-off point used for ER and PgR, 10 fmol mg−1 protein.