Literature DB >> 6466444

Interaction between drug discriminative stimuli and exteroceptive, sensory signals.

T U Järbe, B Johansson.   

Abstract

Interactions between drug discriminative stimuli (based on 5.6 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg pentobarbital) and exteroceptive stimuli (visual and auditory) were studied in a T-maze. In three groups, visual stimuli (light vs. dark) were differentially paired with drug stimuli; the fourth group discriminated combinations of tonal frequencies (1 kHz or 10 kHz) and the presence or absence of pentobarbital. (10 mg/kg). In general, visual stimuli controlled choice behavior (left or right turn) to a greater extent than did the drug training stimuli, whereas the auditory stimuli exerted no apparent control over the pentobarbital stimulus in Group 4. Tests with doses higher than the training doses indicated augmented stimulus control by the drug dimension in two groups (Group 1, 10 mg/kg pentobarbital vs. saline; Group 2, 5.6 mg/kg vs. 10 mg/kg pentobarbital) but not in the third group (5.6 mg/kg pentobarbital vs. saline) in the "conflict" situation, that is, the exteroceptive conditions signaled one response whereas the drug stimulus signaled the opposite response. Discrimination training with only one of the stimulus dimensions resulted in stimulus control in the following order: 10 mg/kg vs. saline greater than 5.6 mg/kg vs. saline greater than 1 kHz vs. 10 kHz, results indicating that the auditory stimuli were of marginal significance. In conclusion, drugs can complete with exteroceptive, visual stimuli for associative strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6466444     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.98.4.686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  7 in total

1.  The effect of training dose on discrimination of compound drug-exteroceptive stimuli.

Authors:  P M Duncan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ9-THC and nicotine from one operant response to another in rats.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi; Brian J LeMay; Torbjörn U C Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; F Rasul; P J Shine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Nicotine competes with a visual stimulus for control of conditioned responding.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Nicole R Wells; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 5.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  Sodium pentobarbital: sensory and associative effects in classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  P Chen; M M Ghoneim; I Gormezano
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Acquisition, extinction, recovery, and reversal of different response sequences under conditional control by nicotine in rats.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.