Vignan Yogendrakumar1, Andrew M Demchuk2, Richard I Aviv3, David Rodriguez-Luna4, Carlos A Molina4, Yolanda S Blas5, Imanuel Dzialowski6, Adam Kobayashi7, Jean-Martin Boulanger8, Cheemun Lum9, Gord Gubitz10, Vasantha Padma11, Jayanta Roy12, Carlos S Kase13, Rohit Bhatia11, Michael D Hill2, Dar Dowlatshahi1. 1. Department of Medicine (Neurology), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 2. Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. 3. Division of Neuroradiology and Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 4. Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. 5. Department of Neurology, Dr Josep Trueta University Hospital, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Girona (IDIBGi) Foundation, Girona, Spain. 6. Department of Neurology, Elblandklinikum Meissen Academic Teaching Hospital of the Technische University, Dresden, Germany. 7. 2nd Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, and Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Warsaw, Poland. 8. Department of Medicine, Charles LeMoyne Hospital, University of Sherbrooke, Montreal, Canada. 9. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Neuroradiology Section, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. 10. Department of Neurology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. 11. Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 12. Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, Kolkata, Kolkata. 13. Department of Neurology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The role of intracerebral haemorrhage location in haematoma expansion remains unclear. Our objective was to assess the effect of lobar versus non-lobar haemorrhage on haematoma expansion and clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed data from the prospective PREDICT study where patients with intracerebral haemorrhage presenting to hospital under 6 h of symptom onset received baseline computed tomography (CT), CT angiogram, 24 h follow-up CT, and 90-day mRS. Intracerebral haemorrhage location was categorised as lobar versus non-lobar, and primary outcomes were significant haematoma expansion (>6 ml) and poor clinical outcome (mRS > 3). Multivariable regression was used to adjust for relevant covariates. The primary analysis population was divided by spot sign status and the effect of haemorrhage location was compared to haematoma expansion in exploratory post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Among 302 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, lobar haemorrhage was associated with increased haematoma expansion >6 ml (p = 0.003), poor clinical outcome (p = 0.011) and mortality (p = 0.017). When adjusted for covariates, lobar haemorrhage independently predicted significant haematoma expansion (aOR 2.2 (95% CI: 1.1-4.3), p = 0.021) and poor clinical outcome (aOR 2.6 (95% CI: 1.2-5.6), p = 0.019). Post hoc analysis showed that patients who were spot sign negative had a higher degree of haematoma expansion with baseline lobar haemorrhage (lobar 26% versus deep 11%; p = 0.01). No significant associations were observed in spot-positive patients (lobar 52% versus deep 47%; p = 0.69). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Haematoma expansion is more likely to occur with lobar intracerebral haemorrhage and haemorrhage location is associated with poor clinical outcome. As expansion is a promising therapeutic target, hemorrhage location may be helpful for prognostication and as a selection tool in future ICH clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION: The role of intracerebral haemorrhage location in haematoma expansion remains unclear. Our objective was to assess the effect of lobar versus non-lobar haemorrhage on haematoma expansion and clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed data from the prospective PREDICT study where patients with intracerebral haemorrhage presenting to hospital under 6 h of symptom onset received baseline computed tomography (CT), CT angiogram, 24 h follow-up CT, and 90-day mRS. Intracerebral haemorrhage location was categorised as lobar versus non-lobar, and primary outcomes were significant haematoma expansion (>6 ml) and poor clinical outcome (mRS > 3). Multivariable regression was used to adjust for relevant covariates. The primary analysis population was divided by spot sign status and the effect of haemorrhage location was compared to haematoma expansion in exploratory post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Among 302 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, lobar haemorrhage was associated with increased haematoma expansion >6 ml (p = 0.003), poor clinical outcome (p = 0.011) and mortality (p = 0.017). When adjusted for covariates, lobar haemorrhage independently predicted significant haematoma expansion (aOR 2.2 (95% CI: 1.1-4.3), p = 0.021) and poor clinical outcome (aOR 2.6 (95% CI: 1.2-5.6), p = 0.019). Post hoc analysis showed that patients who were spot sign negative had a higher degree of haematoma expansion with baseline lobar haemorrhage (lobar 26% versus deep 11%; p = 0.01). No significant associations were observed in spot-positive patients (lobar 52% versus deep 47%; p = 0.69). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Haematoma expansion is more likely to occur with lobar intracerebral haemorrhage and haemorrhage location is associated with poor clinical outcome. As expansion is a promising therapeutic target, hemorrhage location may be helpful for prognostication and as a selection tool in future ICH clinical trials.
Authors: Andrew M Demchuk; Dar Dowlatshahi; David Rodriguez-Luna; Carlos A Molina; Yolanda Silva Blas; Imanuel Dzialowski; Adam Kobayashi; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Cheemun Lum; Gord Gubitz; Vasantha Padma; Jayanta Roy; Carlos S Kase; Jayme Kosior; Rohit Bhatia; Sarah Tymchuk; Suresh Subramaniam; David J Gladstone; Michael D Hill; Richard I Aviv Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: M L Flaherty; M Haverbusch; P Sekar; B Kissela; D Kleindorfer; C J Moomaw; L Sauerbeck; A Schneider; J P Broderick; D Woo Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: H Bart Brouwers; Alessandro Biffi; Alison M Ayres; Kristin Schwab; Lynelle Cortellini; Javier M Romero; Natalia S Rost; Anand Viswanathan; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand; Joshua N Goldstein Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Andrea Evans; Andrew Demchuk; Sean P Symons; Dariush Dowlatshahi; David J Gladstone; Liying Zhang; Allan J Fox; Richard I Aviv Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jayme C Kosior; Sherif Idris; Dar Dowlatshahi; Mohamed Alzawahmah; Muneer Eesa; Pranshu Sharma; Sarah Tymchuk; Michael D Hill; Richard I Aviv; Richard Frayne; Andrew M Demchuk Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Dar Dowlatshahi; Eric E Smith; Matthew L Flaherty; Myzoon Ali; Patrick Lyden; Andrew M Demchuk Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: David Roh; Chung-Huan Sun; Santosh Murthy; Mitchell S V Elkind; Samuel S Bruce; Kara Melmed; Natasha Ironside; Amelia Boehme; Kevin Doyle; Daniel Woo; Hooman Kamel; Soojin Park; Sachin Agarwal; E Sander Connolly; Jan Claassen Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Jochen A Sembill; Joji B Kuramatsu; Stefan T Gerner; Maximilian I Sprügel; Sebastian S Roeder; Dominik Madžar; Manuel Hagen; Philip Hoelter; Hannes Lücking; Arnd Dörfler; Stefan Schwab; Hagen B Huttner Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: David Roh; Amelia Boehme; Codi Young; William Roth; Jose Gutierrez; Matthew Flaherty; Jonathan Rosand; Fernando Testai; Daniel Woo; Mitchell S V Elkind Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Andrea Morotti; Gregoire Boulouis; Andreas Charidimou; Qi Li; Loris Poli; Paolo Costa; Valeria De Giuli; Eleonora Leuci; Federico Mazzacane; Giorgio Busto; Francesco Arba; Laura Brancaleoni; Sebastiano Giacomozzi; Luigi Simonetti; Michele Laudisi; Giuseppe Micieli; Anna Cavallini; Elisa Candeloro; Massimo Gamba; Mauro Magoni; Andrew D Warren; Christopher D Anderson; M Edip Gurol; Alessandro Biffi; Anand Viswanathan; Ilaria Casetta; Enrico Fainardi; Andrea Zini; Alessandro Pezzini; Alessandro Padovani; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand; Joshua N Goldstein Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 9.910