BACKGROUND: Volume measurements of intracerebral haemorrhage are prognostically important and are increasingly used in clinical trials to measure the effects of potential interventions. The purpose of this work is to establish the reliability of haematoma volume measurements obtained using a computer-assisted method called Quantomo (for quantitative tomography) and the ABC/2 method. Hypothesis Quantomo reliably detects smaller changes in intracerebral haemorrhage volume as compared with the ABC/2 method because computer-assisted volume measurements are tailored to measure the geometry of individual haematoma volumes whereas the ABC/2 method approximates all haematoma volumes as ellipsoids. METHODS: Thirty randomly selected computed tomography scans with intracerebral haemorrhage were measured by four raters a total of four times each (two sessions using Quantomo and two using the ABC/2 method). Interrater and intrarater reliability for both techniques were calculated simultaneously using a two-way random-effects analysis of variance model. The precision of intracerebral haemorrhage volume measurement was quantified as the minimum detectable difference with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The median (first quartile and third quartile) intracerebral haemorrhage volume measurements of all rater and sessions for Quantomo were 32.7 ml (6.2 and 54.4 ml) and for ABC/2 40.7 ml (8.6 and 76.0 ml). Quantomo intracerebral haemorrhage volume measurements were more precise, having an inter- and intrarater minimum detectable difference of 8.1 and 5.3 ml, while the inter- and intrarater minimum detectable difference for ABC/2 were 37.0 and 15.7 ml. CONCLUSIONS: Quantomo is a computer-assisted methodology that is more reliable for quantifying intracerebral haemorrhage volume as compared with the ABC/2 method.
BACKGROUND: Volume measurements of intracerebral haemorrhage are prognostically important and are increasingly used in clinical trials to measure the effects of potential interventions. The purpose of this work is to establish the reliability of haematoma volume measurements obtained using a computer-assisted method called Quantomo (for quantitative tomography) and the ABC/2 method. Hypothesis Quantomo reliably detects smaller changes in intracerebral haemorrhage volume as compared with the ABC/2 method because computer-assisted volume measurements are tailored to measure the geometry of individual haematoma volumes whereas the ABC/2 method approximates all haematoma volumes as ellipsoids. METHODS: Thirty randomly selected computed tomography scans with intracerebral haemorrhage were measured by four raters a total of four times each (two sessions using Quantomo and two using the ABC/2 method). Interrater and intrarater reliability for both techniques were calculated simultaneously using a two-way random-effects analysis of variance model. The precision of intracerebral haemorrhage volume measurement was quantified as the minimum detectable difference with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The median (first quartile and third quartile) intracerebral haemorrhage volume measurements of all rater and sessions for Quantomo were 32.7 ml (6.2 and 54.4 ml) and for ABC/2 40.7 ml (8.6 and 76.0 ml). Quantomo intracerebral haemorrhage volume measurements were more precise, having an inter- and intrarater minimum detectable difference of 8.1 and 5.3 ml, while the inter- and intrarater minimum detectable difference for ABC/2 were 37.0 and 15.7 ml. CONCLUSIONS: Quantomo is a computer-assisted methodology that is more reliable for quantifying intracerebral haemorrhage volume as compared with the ABC/2 method.
Authors: N Asdaghi; J I Coulter; J Modi; M C Camden; A Qazi; M Goyal; T Rundek; S B Coutts Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alastair J S Webb; Natalie L Ullman; Tim C Morgan; John Muschelli; Joshua Kornbluth; Issam A Awad; Stephen Mayo; Michael Rosenblum; Wendy Ziai; Mario Zuccarrello; Francois Aldrich; Sayona John; Sagi Harnof; George Lopez; William C Broaddus; Christine Wijman; Paul Vespa; Ross Bullock; Stephen J Haines; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Stan Tuhrim; Michael D Hill; Raj Narayan; Daniel F Hanley Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Candice Delcourt; Cheryl Carcel; Danni Zheng; Shoichiro Sato; Hisatomi Arima; Sonu Bhaskar; Pierre Janin; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Yongjun Cao; Shihong Zhang; Emma Heeley; Leo Davies; John Chalmers; Craig S Anderson Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Extra Date: 2019-12-13
Authors: Negar Asdaghi; Lesly A Pearce; Makoto Nakajima; Thalia S Field; Carlos Bazan; Franco Cermeno; Leslie A McClure; David C Anderson; Robert G Hart; Oscar R Benavente Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: C D Barras; B M Tress; S Christensen; M Collins; P M Desmond; B E Skolnick; S A Mayer; S M Davis Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Dar Dowlatshahi; H Bart Brouwers; Andrew M Demchuk; Michael D Hill; Richard I Aviv; Lee-Anne Ufholz; Michael Reaume; Max Wintermark; J Claude Hemphill; Yasuo Murai; Yongjun Wang; Xingquan Zhao; Yilong Wang; Na Li; Takatoshi Sorimachi; Mitsunori Matsumae; Thorsten Steiner; Timolaos Rizos; Steven M Greenberg; Javier M Romero; Jonathan Rosand; Joshua N Goldstein; Mukul Sharma Journal: Stroke Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Teddy Y Wu; Oluwaseun Sobowale; Robert Hurford; Gagan Sharma; Søren Christensen; Nawaf Yassi; Turgut Tatlisumak; Patricia M Desmond; Bruce C V Campbell; Stephen M Davis; Adrian R Parry-Jones; Atte Meretoja Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Vignan Yogendrakumar; Andrew M Demchuk; Richard I Aviv; David Rodriguez-Luna; Carlos A Molina; Yolanda S Blas; Imanuel Dzialowski; Adam Kobayashi; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Cheemun Lum; Gord Gubitz; Vasantha Padma; Jayanta Roy; Carlos S Kase; Rohit Bhatia; Michael D Hill; Dar Dowlatshahi Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2017-06-15