| Literature DB >> 34165245 |
Dongzhou Zhuang1, Jiangtao Sheng2, Guoyi Peng1, Tian Li2, Shirong Cai1, Faxiu Din1, Lianjie Li3, Mindong Huang4, Fei Tian5, Kangsheng Li2, Shousen Wang3, Weiqiang Chen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed to capture the inflammatory status of patients with various conditions involving the brain. This retrospective study aimed to explore the association between the NLR and the early growth of traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage (tICH) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34165245 PMCID: PMC8351393 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol ISSN: 2328-9503 Impact factor: 4.511
Differences between with growth of tICH and without growth of tICH (univariate analysis).
| Term | Total ( | Population ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| With growth of tICH ( | Without growth of tICH ( | |||
| Age | 48.63 ± 17.92 | 49.68 ± 18.28 | 47.56 ± 17.49 | 0.053 |
| Gender | 0.508 | |||
| Male | 815 (75.7%) | 407 (74.8%) | 408 (76.5%) | |
| Female | 262 (24.3%) | 137 (25.2%) | 125 (23.5%) | |
| GCS score | 11.54 ± 3.39 | 11.03 ± 3.41 | 12.06 ± 3.30 |
|
| Baseline CT time, h | 2.92 ± 2.13 | 2.67 ± 1.92 | 3.17 ± 2.30 |
|
| Hypertension | 114 (10.6%) | 67 (12.3%) | 47 (8.8%) | 0.112 |
| MAP, mmHg | 99.82 ± 16.66 | 100.78 ± 18.54 | 98.85 ± 14.48 | 0.094 |
| Diabetes | 51 (4.7%) | 28 (5.2%) | 23 (4.4%) | 0.502 |
| Smoking | 170 (15.8%) | 90 (16.9%) | 80 (15.5%) | 0.544 |
| Alcohol abuse | 104 (9.7%) | 50 (9.4%) | 54 (10.5%) | 0.550 |
| Combine injury | 430 (39.9%) | 227 (41.7%) | 203 (38.2%) | 0.232 |
| Contercoup injury | 255 (23.7%) | 225 (41.4%) | 30 (5.6%) |
|
| Lobe of contusion | 0.056 | |||
| Frontal | 472 (43.8%) | 247 (45.4%) | 225 (42.2%) | |
| Temporal | 473 (43.9%) | 245 (45.0%) | 228 (42.8%) | |
| Parietal | 56 (5.2%) | 19 (3.5%) | 37 (6.9%) | |
| Occipital | 24 (2.2%) | 12 (2.2%) | 12 (2.3%) | |
| Others | 52 (4.8%) | 21 (3.9%) | 31 (5.8%) | |
| IVH | 68 (6.3%) | 37 (6.9%) | 31 (5.8%) | 0.491 |
| SAH | 802 (74.5%) | 445 (82.1%) | 357 (67.1%) |
|
| SDH | 672 (62.4%) | 413 (75.9%) | 259 (48.7%) |
|
| EDH | 226 (21.0%) | 122 (22.5%) | 105 (19.5%) | 0.234 |
| Encephalatrophy | 53 (4.9%) | 28 (5.2%) | 25 (4.7%) | 0.740 |
| Initial haematoma volume, mL | 4.72 ± 9.73 | 5.99 ± 9.26 | 3.43 ± 10.03 |
|
| Inflammatory index parameters | ||||
| Leucocyte count | 15.33 ± 5.56 | 16.40 ± 5.41 | 14.24 ± 5.50 |
|
| Neutrophil count | 13.02 ± 5.16 | 14.40 ± 4.93 | 11.61 ± 5.02 |
|
| Lymphocyte count | 1.35 ± 0.93 | 1.00 ± 0.60 | 1.71 ± 1.06 |
|
| Mononuclear cell count | 0.85 ± 0.50 | 0.88 ± 0.48 | 0.82 ± 0.48 |
|
| NLR | 13.11 ± 10.49 | 17.84 ± 12.31 | 8.28 ± 4.63 |
|
| Surgery for cleaning intracranial haematoma | 257 (23.9%) | 185 (34.0%) | 72 (13.5%) |
|
tICH, traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage; CT, computed tomographic; GCS score, Glasgow Coma Scale; MAP, mean arterial pressure; IVH, Intraventricular haemorrhage; SAH, subarachnoid haemorrhage; SDH, subdural haematoma; EDH, epidural haematoma; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio.
The bold values are the parameters with statistically significant difference in the included patients with and without tICH. Those may underlying the growth of tICH therefore deserve further analysis.
Characteristic of growth of tICH stratified by surgical intervention.
| Variables | Surgical intervention |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes ( | No ( | ||
| Age, years | 49.82 ± 18.12 | 49.61 ± 18.38 | 0.900 |
| Gender | 0.589 | ||
| Male | 141 (76.2%) | 266 (74.1%) | |
| Female | 44 (23.8%) | 93 (25.9%) | |
| GCS score | 10.36 ± 3.39 | 11.38 ± 3.37 |
|
| Baseline CT time, h | 2.86 ± 2.38 | 2.58 ± 1.63 | 0.148 |
| Hypertension (%) | 25 (14.2%) | 42 (12.0%) | 0.482 |
| MAP, mmHg | 103.58 ± 20.64 | 99.44 ± 17.32 |
|
| Diabetes (%) | 13 (7.2%) | 15 (4.2%) | 0.266 |
| Smoking (%) | 31 (17.2%) | 59 (16.7%) | 0.882 |
| Drink abuse (%) | 18 (10.0%) | 32 (9.0%) | 0.719 |
| Combined injury (%) | 80 (43.2%) | 147 (40.9%) | 0.607 |
| Contrecoup injury (%) | 99 (53.8%) | 126 (35.1%) |
|
| Lobe of contusion | 0.819 | ||
| Frontal (%) | 79 (42.7%) | 168 (46.8%) | |
| Temporal (%) | 89 (48.1%) | 156 (43.5%) | |
| Parietal (%) | 7 (3.8%) | 12 (3.3%) | |
| Occipital (%) | 3 (1.6%) | 9 (2.5%) | |
| Other (%) | 7 (3.8%) | 14 (3.9%) | |
| IVH (%) | 17 (9.3%) | 20 (5.6%) | 0.108 |
| SAH (%) | 169 (91.8%) | 276 (77.1%) |
|
| SDH (%) | 152 (82.2%) | 261 (72.7%) |
|
| EDH (%) | 57 (31.0%) | 65 (18.2%) |
|
| Encephalatrophy (%) | 4 (2.2%) | 24 (6.7%) |
|
| Initial haematoma volume, mL | 8.97 ± 10.68 | 4.36 ± 7.95 |
|
| NLR | 19.79 ± 17.52 | 16.84 ± 8.32 |
|
tICH, traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage; CT, computed tomographic; EDH, extradural haemorrhage; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; IVH, intraventricular haemorrhage; MAP, mean arterial pressure; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; SAH, subarachnoid haemorrhage; SDH, subdural haemorrhage.
The bold values are the parameters with statistically significant difference in the included patients required surgical intervention or not in the group of growth of tICH. Those may underlying the risk factors for surgical intervention among patients with growth of tICH therefore deserve further analysis.
Statistical analysis for tICH and surgical intervention with different models.
| Screening model | Logistic regression | ROC curve | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| −2likelihood | AUC (95% CI) |
| Youden’s index | Cut‐off point | |
| tICH | |||||||
| Univariate analysis | 1.321 (1.275–1.369) | <0.001 | – | 0.864 (0.842–0.885) | <0.001 | 0.602 | 10.94 |
| Reduced model without NLR | NA | NA | 991.275 | 0.805 (0.777–0.833) | <0.001 | – | – |
| Full model with NLR | 1.309 (1.254–1.367) | <0.001 | 726.577 | 0.908 (0.890–0.927) | <0.001 | 0.675 | 0.514 |
| Surgery intervention | |||||||
| Univariate analysis | 1.020 (1.004–1.036) | 0.016 | – | 0.538 (0.486–0.589) | 0.149 | 0.088 | 14.99 |
| Reduced model without NLR | NA | NA | 371.553 | 0.745 (0.699–0.790) | <0.001 | – | – |
| Full model with NLR | 1.027 (1.003–1.053) | 0.029 | 365.514 | 0.744 (0.698–0.790) | <0.001 | 0.436 | 0.312 |
tICH, traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Deviance test, goodness‐of‐fit statistic = 264.70 (), it is significant.
Deviance test, goodness‐of‐fit statistic = 1.017 (), it is non‐significant.
Figure 1Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for a univariate analysis (NLR model), reduced model (without NLR) and final model (with NLR) on (A) growth of tICH, (B) surgery intervention. tICH, traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
Prediction accuracies of patients with the growth of tICH by different models.
| Term | Model | Prediction | Patients with the growth of tICH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | |||
| tICH | NLR model | No | 417 (81.0%) | 98 (19.0%) |
| Yes | 116 (21.8%) |
| ||
| Full model | No | 409 (81.3%) | 94 (18.7%) | |
| Yes | 58 (13.4%) |
| ||
Positive prediction accuracies are in bold. tICH, traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
Figure 2NLR level was positively associated with an unfavourable outcome of the patient with TBI. (A) NLR levels in favourable and unfavourable outcome groups. (B) Relationship between the probability of an unfavourable outcome and NLR level after cerebral contusion. NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; TBI, traumatic brain injury.