Literature DB >> 9231446

The effect of drinking and driving interventions on alcohol-involved traffic crashes within a comprehensive community trial.

R B Voas1, H D Holder, P J Gruenewald.   

Abstract

The Drinking and Driving Component, one of five elements of the Community Trials Project, involved the implementation of a special drink driving countermeasure in the three experimental communities, one in Northern California, one in Southern California and another in South Carolina. This intensified enforcement of driving under the influence (DUI) was designed to deter potential drinking drivers by increasing their perception of the risk of being arrested leading to a reduction in the consumption of alcohol before driving. See component detailed description in Voas (1997, this issue). The evaluation found that media advocacy training and technical assistance resulted in increased DUI news coverage and that additional police officer hours for DUI enforcement, greater use of breathalyzer equipment, increased officer training and more checkpoints produced increased DUI enforcement. The combined effects of increased DUI news coverage and DUI enforcement yielded increased public perceived risk of arrest and subsequently less drinking and driving. Overall the evaluation found that alcohol-involved traffic crashes were reduced as a result of this component in the experimental communities as contrasted with the matched comparison communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9231446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  14 in total

Review 1.  Prevention research and its actual application to health services.

Authors:  H D Holder
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Drunk driving among novice drivers, possible prevention with additional psychological module in driving school curriculum.

Authors:  Diva Eensoo; Marika Paaver; Jaanus Harro
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

3.  A framework for understanding "evidence" in prevention research and programs.

Authors:  Sheppard G Kellam; Doris J Langevin
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2003-09

4.  The prevalence of alcohol use disorders among night-time weekend drivers.

Authors:  C Debra Furr-Holden; Robert B Voas; John Lacey; Eduardo Romano; Kristina Jones
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Replication of a Controlled Community Prevention Trial: Results From a Local Implementation of Science-Based Intervention to Reduce Impaired Driving.

Authors:  Michael D George; Harold D Holder; Paul N McKenzie; Heather R Mueller; Donna C Herchek; Barry S Faile
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2018-02

6.  Media advocacy, tobacco control policy change and teen smoking in Florida.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Matthew C Farrelly; Dana Wenter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Sobriety Checkpoints and Alcohol-Involved Motor Vehicle Crashes at Different Temporal Scales.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Jason Ferris; Douglas J Wiebe; Corinne Peek-Asa; Charles C Branas
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Those harmed by others' drinking in the US population are more depressed and distressed.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; William C Kerr; Yu Ye; Lauren M Kaplan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Validity of surrogate measures of alcohol involvement when applied to nonfatal crashes.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; Eduardo Romano; Raymond Peck
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2009-02-24

10.  Evaluation of seven publicized enforcement demonstration programs to reduce impaired driving: Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, and Michigan.

Authors:  James C Fell; A Scott Tippetts; Marvin Levy
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.