Literature DB >> 31003603

Time to Follow-up After Colorectal Cancer Screening by Health Insurance Type.

Nancy Breen1, Celette Sugg Skinner2, Yingye Zheng3, Stephen Inrig4, Douglas A Corley5, Elisabeth F Beaber3, Mike Garcia3, Jessica Chubak6, Chyke Doubeni7, Virginia P Quinn8, Jennifer S Haas9, Christopher I Li3, Karen J Wernli6, Carrie N Klabunde10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with Medicaid insurance or Medicaid-like coverage would have longer times to follow-up and be less likely to complete colonoscopy compared with patients with commercial insurance within the same healthcare systems.
METHODS: A total of 35,009 patients aged 50-64years with a positive fecal immunochemical test were evaluated in Northern and Southern California Kaiser Permanente systems and in a North Texas safety-net system between 2011 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used between 2016 and 2017 to calculate the probability of having follow-up colonoscopy by coverage type. Among Kaiser Permanente patients, Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs for the association between coverage type and receipt of follow-up, adjusting for sociodemographics and health status.
RESULTS: Even within the same integrated system with organized follow-up, patients with Medicaid were 24% less likely to complete follow-up as those with commercial insurance. Percentage receiving colonoscopy within 3 months after a positive fecal immunochemical test was 74.6% for commercial insurance, 63.10% for Medicaid only, and 37.5% for patients served by the integrated safety-net system.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with Medicaid were less likely than those with commercial insurance to complete follow-up colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test and had longer average times to follow-up. With the future of coverage mechanisms uncertain, it is important and timely to assess influences of health insurance coverage on likelihood of follow-up colonoscopy and identify potential disparities in screening completion.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31003603      PMCID: PMC6820676          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  44 in total

Review 1.  Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Robert A Hiatt; Carrie Klabunde; Nancy Breen; Judith Swan; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Elisabeth F Beaber; Jasmin Tiro; Jane Kim; Anne Marie McCarthy; Virginia P Quinn; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cosette M Wheeler; William E Barlow; Mackenzie Bronson; Michael Garcia; Douglas A Corley; Jennifer S Haas; Ethan A Halm; Aruna Kamineni; Carolyn M Rutter; Tor D Tosteson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems.

Authors:  Theodore R Levin; Laura Jamieson; Daniel A Burley; Juan Reyes; Michael Oehrli; Cindy Caldwell
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 4.  The Role of Patient Navigation on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Education: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ajeesh Sunny; Luis Rustveld
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Amy Jeffreys; Cynthia J Coffman; Kenneth Fasanella
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Kathleen A Cronin; Nancy Breen; William R Waldron; Anita H Ambs; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Amy A Gravely; James F Burgess; David A Haggstrom; Sarah E Lillie; David B Nelson; Sean M Nugent; Aasma Shaukat; Shahnaz Sultan; Louise C Walter; Diana J Burgess
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Ann G Zauber; Carolyn M Rutter; Steffie K Naber; V Paul Doria-Rose; Chester Pabiniak; Colden Johanson; Sara E Fischer; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Time from positive screening fecal occult blood test to colonoscopy and risk of neoplasia.

Authors:  Ziad F Gellad; Daniel Almirall; Dawn Provenzale; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Framework and Strategies to Eliminate Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Kevin Selby; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 13.739

2.  Low Rates of Colonoscopy Follow-up After a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Medicaid Health Plan Delivered Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Imara I West; Malaika Schwartz; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.