Melissa R Partin1,2, Amy A Gravely1, James F Burgess3,4, David A Haggstrom5,6, Sarah E Lillie1,2, David B Nelson1,2, Sean M Nugent1, Aasma Shaukat1,2, Shahnaz Sultan1,2, Louise C Walter7, Diana J Burgess1,2. 1. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. 6. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 7. Division of Geriatrics, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient, physician, and environmental factors were identified, and the authors examined the contribution of these factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) screening. METHODS: In total, 76,243 FOBT/FIT-positive patients were identified from 120 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities between August 16, 2009 and March 20, 2011 and were followed for 6 months. Patient demographic (race/ethnicity, sex, age, marital status) and health characteristics (comorbidities), physician characteristics (training level, whether primary care provider) and behaviors (inappropriate FOBT/FIT screening), and environmental factors (geographic access, facility type) were identified from VHA administrative records. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) were estimated with statistical text mining conducted on clinic notes, and follow-up predictors and adjusted rates were estimated using hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Roughly 50% of individuals completed a colonoscopy at a VHA facility within 6 months. Age and comorbidity score were negatively associated with follow-up. Blacks were more likely to receive follow-up than whites. Environmental factors attenuated but did not fully account for these differences. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) and physician behaviors (inappropriate screening) fully accounted for the small reverse race disparity and attenuated variation by age and comorbidity score. Patient behaviors (refusal and private sector colonoscopy use) contributed more to variation in follow-up rates than physician behaviors (inappropriate screening). CONCLUSIONS: In the VHA, blacks are more likely to receive colonoscopy follow-up for positive FOBT/FIT results than whites, and follow-up rates markedly decline with advancing age and comorbidity burden. Patient and physician behaviors explain race variation in follow-up rates and contribute to variation by age and comorbidity burden. Cancer 2017;123:3502-12. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND:Patient, physician, and environmental factors were identified, and the authors examined the contribution of these factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) screening. METHODS: In total, 76,243 FOBT/FIT-positive patients were identified from 120 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities between August 16, 2009 and March 20, 2011 and were followed for 6 months. Patient demographic (race/ethnicity, sex, age, marital status) and health characteristics (comorbidities), physician characteristics (training level, whether primary care provider) and behaviors (inappropriate FOBT/FIT screening), and environmental factors (geographic access, facility type) were identified from VHA administrative records. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) were estimated with statistical text mining conducted on clinic notes, and follow-up predictors and adjusted rates were estimated using hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Roughly 50% of individuals completed a colonoscopy at a VHA facility within 6 months. Age and comorbidity score were negatively associated with follow-up. Blacks were more likely to receive follow-up than whites. Environmental factors attenuated but did not fully account for these differences. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) and physician behaviors (inappropriate screening) fully accounted for the small reverse race disparity and attenuated variation by age and comorbidity score. Patient behaviors (refusal and private sector colonoscopy use) contributed more to variation in follow-up rates than physician behaviors (inappropriate screening). CONCLUSIONS: In the VHA, blacks are more likely to receive colonoscopy follow-up for positive FOBT/FIT results than whites, and follow-up rates markedly decline with advancing age and comorbidity burden. Patient and physician behaviors explain race variation in follow-up rates and contribute to variation by age and comorbidity burden. Cancer 2017;123:3502-12. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Keywords:
colonoscopy; colorectal neoplasms; diagnostic services; early detection of cancer; health services accessibility; mass screening; veterans health
Authors: Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Elizabeth B Lamont; Samuel R Bozeman; Barbara J McNeil Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R E Myers; T Hyslop; M Gerrity; N Schlackman; N Hanchak; J Grana; B J Turner; D Weinberg; W W Hauck Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Kristin Koelling; Kevin Stroupe; Noreen Arnold; Katherine Mallin; Min-Woong Sohn; Frances M Weaver; Larry Manheim; Linda Kok Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Charlotte M Carlson; Katharine A Kirby; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin; Christine E Kistler; Louise C Walter Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-10-11
Authors: Barbara Turner; Ronald E Myers; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; David Weinberg; Timothy Brigham; James Grana; Todd Rothermel; Neil Schlackman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Masahito Jimbo; Ronald E Myers; Birgit Meyer; Terry Hyslop; James Cocroft; Barbara J Turner; David S Weinberg Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jessica Chubak; Michael P Garcia; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Yingye Zheng; Douglas A Corley; Ethan A Halm; Amit G Singal; Carrie N Klabunde; Chyke A Doubeni; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Joanne E Schottinger; Beverly B Green; Virginia P Quinn; Carolyn M Rutter Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Vivy T Cusumano; Anthony Myint; Edgar Corona; Liu Yang; Jennifer Bocek; Antonio G Lopez; Marcela Zhou Huang; Naveen Raja; Anna Dermenchyan; Lily Roh; Maria Han; Daniel Croymans; Folasade P May Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2021-02-20 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Elaine C Khoong; Natalie A Rivadeneira; Lucia Pacca; Dean Schillinger; David Lown; Palav Babaria; Neha Gupta; Rajiv Pramanik; Helen Tran; Tyler Whitezell; Ma Somsouk; Urmimala Sarkar Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Jason Kao; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa D Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2022-05-18
Authors: Monica L Kasting; Shannon M Christy; Richard R Reich; Julie A Rathwell; Richard G Roetzheim; Susan T Vadaparampil; Anna R Giuliano Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Megan A Adams; Joel H Rubenstein; Rachel Lipson; Robert G Holleman; Sameer D Saini Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nancy Breen; Celette Sugg Skinner; Yingye Zheng; Stephen Inrig; Douglas A Corley; Elisabeth F Beaber; Mike Garcia; Jessica Chubak; Chyke Doubeni; Virginia P Quinn; Jennifer S Haas; Christopher I Li; Karen J Wernli; Carrie N Klabunde Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Yazmin San Miguel; Joshua Demb; Maria Elena Martinez; Samir Gupta; Folasade P May Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Jennifer S Lin; Kathryn E Bouskill Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 4.090