Literature DB >> 16211439

Comparative anatomy of the porcine and human thoracic spines with reference to thoracoscopic surgical techniques.

H Bozkus1, N R Crawford, R H Chamberlain, T D Valenzuela, A Espinoza, Z Yüksel, C A Dickman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared porcine and human thoracic spine anatomies for a better understanding of how structures encountered during thoracoscopy differ between training with a porcine model and actual surgery in humans.
METHODS: Parameters were measured including vertebral body height, width, and depth; disc height; rib spacing; spinal canal depth and width; and pedicle height and width.
RESULTS: Although most porcine vertebral structures were smaller, porcine pedicle height was significantly greater than that of humans because the porcine pedicle houses a unique transverse foramen. The longus colli and psoas attach, respectively, to T5 and T13 in swine and to T3 and T12 in humans. In swine, the azygos vein generally was absent. The intercostal veins drained into the hemiazygos vein.
CONCLUSIONS: Several thoracoscopically relevant anatomic differences between human and porcine spinal anatomies were identified. A thoracoscopic approach in a porcine model probably is best performed from the right side. The best general working area is between T6 and T10.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16211439     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0159-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: an animal model for endoscopic approach to the anterior cervical and upper thoracic spine.

Authors:  F Rubino; H Deutsch; V Pamoukian; J F Zhu; W A King; M Gagner
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  Endoscopic spine surgery.

Authors:  C A Dickman; P W Detweiler; R W Porter
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  2000

Review 3.  The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine - biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Thoracic human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; K Takata; V Goel; D Federico; T Oxland; J Duranceau; M Krag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Thoracoscopic spinal surgery. Treatment of thoracic instability.

Authors:  D G Karahalios; P J Apostolides; A G Vishteh; C A Dickman
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Biportal thoracoscopic sympathectomy: surgical techniques and clinical results for the treatment of hyperhidrosis.

Authors:  Patrick P Han; Oren N Gottfried; Kathy J Kenny; Curtis A Dickman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Thoracic discectomy using video assisted thoracoscopy.

Authors:  M B Horowitz; J J Moossy; T Julian; P F Ferson; K Huneke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Anterior thoracoscopic spine release in deformity surgery: a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  V Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Thoracoscopic approaches to the thoracic spine: experience with 241 surgical procedures.

Authors:  Patrick P Han; Kathy Kenny; Curtis A Dickman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Thoracoscopic approaches to the thoracic spine.

Authors:  M Visocchi; R Masferrer; V K Sonntag; C A Dickman
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.216

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Yi-Fei Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the complete porcine spine in comparison with data of the human spine.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Jürgen Geppert; Annette Kienle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Porcine spine finite element model: a complementary tool to experimental scoliosis fusionless instrumentation.

Authors:  Bahe Hachem; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.

Authors:  Sriram Balasubramanian; James R Peters; Lucy F Robinson; Anita Singh; Richard W Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Refinement of pig retroperfusion technique: Global retroperfusion with ligation of the azygos connection preserves hemodynamic function in an acute infarction model in pigs (Sus scrofa domestica).

Authors:  Frank Harig; Evelyn Hoyer; Dirk Labahn; Joachim Schmidt; Michael Weyand; Stephan M Ensminger
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.982

6.  Right infraaxillary thoracotomy approach for upper thoracic vertebral decompression and fusion at T2-T6 levels: a technical note.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Shengfa Li; Ke Huang; Xianzhe Lu; Yu Shi; Kegong Xie; Yujing Tang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparative Morphometry of the Wisconsin Miniature SwineTM Thoracic Spine for Modeling Human Spine in Translational Spinal Cord Injury Research.

Authors:  Gurwattan Singh Miranpuri; Dominic T Schomberg; Patricia Stan; Abhishek Chopra; Seah Buttar; Aleksandar Wood; Alexandra Radzin; Jennifer J Meudt; Daniel K Resnick; Dhanansayan Shanmuganayagam
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-24

8.  Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine.

Authors:  Iris Busscher; Joris J W Ploegmakers; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Albert G Veldhuizen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans.

Authors:  Sun-Ren Sheng; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Li Wang; Qing-An Zhu; Fang-Min Mao; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reduction of intradiscal pressure by the use of polycarbonate-urethane rods as compared to titanium rods in posterior thoracolumbar spinal fixation.

Authors:  Eva Jacobs; Alex K Roth; Jacobus J Arts; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Paul C Willems
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.