Literature DB >> 30995674

Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors.

Sara P Garcia1, Sowmya Iyer1, Caleb A Lareau1,2, Julian Grünewald1,3,4,5, Ronghao Zhou1,3,4, Martin J Aryee1,3,4,5,2, J Keith Joung6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas base-editor technology enables targeted nucleotide alterations, and is being increasingly used for research and potential therapeutic applications1,2. The most widely used cytosine base editors (CBEs) induce deamination of DNA cytosines using the rat APOBEC1 enzyme, which is targeted by a linked Cas protein-guide RNA complex3,4. Previous studies of the specificity of CBEs have identified off-target DNA edits in mammalian cells5,6. Here we show that a CBE with rat APOBEC1 can cause extensive transcriptome-wide deamination of RNA cytosines in human cells, inducing tens of thousands of C-to-U edits with frequencies ranging from 0.07% to 100% in 38-58% of expressed genes. CBE-induced RNA edits occur in both protein-coding and non-protein-coding sequences and generate missense, nonsense, splice site, and 5' and 3' untranslated region mutations. We engineered two CBE variants bearing mutations in rat APOBEC1 that substantially decreased the number of RNA edits (by more than 390-fold and more than 3,800-fold) in human cells. These variants also showed more precise on-target DNA editing than the wild-type CBE and, for most guide RNAs tested, no substantial reduction in editing efficiency. Finally, we show that an adenine base editor7 can also induce transcriptome-wide RNA edits. These results have implications for the use of base editors in both research and clinical settings, illustrate the feasibility of engineering improved variants with reduced RNA editing activities, and suggest the need to more fully define and characterize the RNA off-target effects of deaminase enzymes in base editor platforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30995674      PMCID: PMC6657343          DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1161-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  3 in total

1.  Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing. Direct determination of the edited base and occurrence in non-apolipoprotein B-producing cell lines.

Authors:  K Boström; Z Garcia; K S Poksay; D F Johnson; A J Lusis; T L Innerarity
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-12-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Mutational analysis of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (APOBEC1). structure-function relationships of RNA editing and dimerization.

Authors:  B B Teng; S Ochsner; Q Zhang; K V Soman; P P Lau; L Chan
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  Cloning and mutagenesis of the rabbit ApoB mRNA editing protein. A zinc motif is essential for catalytic activity, and noncatalytic auxiliary factor(s) of the editing complex are widely distributed.

Authors:  S Yamanaka; K S Poksay; M E Balestra; G Q Zeng; T L Innerarity
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-08-26       Impact factor: 5.157

  3 in total
  160 in total

Review 1.  Single-nucleotide editing: From principle, optimization to application.

Authors:  Jinling Tang; Trevor Lee; Tao Sun
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  State-of-the-Art 2019 on Gene Therapy for Phenylketonuria.

Authors:  Hiu Man Grisch-Chan; Gerald Schwank; Cary O Harding; Beat Thöny
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.695

3.  Development and Characterization of a Modular CRISPR and RNA Aptamer Mediated Base Editing System.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Collantes; Victor M Tan; Huiting Xu; Melany Ruiz-Urigüen; Amer Alasadi; Jingjing Guo; Hanlin Tao; Chi Su; Katarzyna M Tyc; Tommaso Selmi; John J Lambourne; Jennifer A Harbottle; Jesse Stombaugh; Jinchuan Xing; Ceri M Wiggins; Shengkan Jin
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2021-02

4.  CRISPR, animals, and FDA oversight: Building a path to success.

Authors:  Laura R Epstein; Stella S Lee; Mayumi F Miller; Heather A Lombardi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  In vivo base editing restores sensory transduction and transiently improves auditory function in a mouse model of recessive deafness.

Authors:  Wei-Hsi Yeh; Olga Shubina-Oleinik; Jonathan M Levy; Bifeng Pan; Gregory A Newby; Michael Wornow; Rachel Burt; Jonathan C Chen; Jeffrey R Holt; David R Liu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  A cytosine deaminase for programmable single-base RNA editing.

Authors:  Omar O Abudayyeh; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Brian Franklin; Jeremy Koob; Max J Kellner; Alim Ladha; Julia Joung; Paul Kirchgatterer; David B T Cox; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Got mutation? 'Base editors' fix genomes one nucleotide at a time.

Authors:  Sandeep Ravindran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Base Editors: Modular Tools for the Introduction of Point Mutations in Living Cells.

Authors:  Mallory Evanoff; Alexis C Komor
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2019-09-10

9.  In vivo HSPC gene therapy with base editors allows for efficient reactivation of fetal γ-globin in β-YAC mice.

Authors:  Chang Li; Aphrodite Georgakopoulou; Arpit Mishra; Sucheol Gil; R David Hawkins; Evangelia Yannaki; André Lieber
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

10.  Detect-seq reveals out-of-protospacer editing and target-strand editing by cytosine base editors.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Haowei Meng; Zhicong Lv; Menghao Liu; Huanan Zhao; Hao Wu; Xiaoxue Zhang; Lulu Liu; Yuan Zhuang; Kailin Yin; Yongchang Yan; Chengqi Yi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.