Vasileios Kokkinos1,2, Nathaniel D Sisterson3, Thomas A Wozny1, R Mark Richardson1,2,4. 1. Brain Modulation Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. University of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Medical student, Brain Modulation Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: A bidirectional brain-computer interface that performs neurostimulation has been shown to improve seizure control in patients with refractory epilepsy, but the therapeutic mechanism is unknown. Objective: To investigate whether electrographic effects of responsive neurostimulation (RNS), identified in electrocorticographic (ECOG) recordings from the device, are associated with patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective review of ECOG recordings and accompanying clinical meta-data from 11 consecutive patients with focal epilepsy who were implanted with a neurostimulation system between January 28, 2015, and June 6, 2017, with 22 to 112 weeks of follow-up. Recorded ECOG data were obtained from the manufacturer; additional system-generated meta-data, including recording and detection settings, were collected directly from the manufacturer's management system using an in-house, custom-built platform. Electrographic seizure patterns were identified in RNS recordings and evaluated in the time-frequency domain, which was locked to the onset of the seizure pattern. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patterns of electrophysiological modulation were identified and then classified according to their latency of onset in relation to triggered stimulation events. Seizure control after RNS implantation was assessed by 3 main variables: mean frequency of seizure occurrence, estimated mean severity of seizures, and mean duration of seizures. Overall seizure outcomes were evaluated by the extended Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale questionnaires, a patient-reported outcome measure of 3 domains (seizure characteristics, medication adverse effects, and quality of life), with a range of possible scores from 0 to 300 in which lower scores indicate worse status, and the Engel scale, which comprises 4 classes (I-IV) in which lower numbers indicate greater improvement. Results: Electrocorticographic data from 11 patients (8 female; mean [range] age, 35 [19-65] years; mean [range] duration of epilepsy, 19 [5-37] years) were analyzed. Two main categories of electrophysiological signatures of stimulation-induced modulation of the seizure network were discovered: direct and indirect effects. Direct effects included ictal inhibition and early frequency modulation but were not associated with improved clinical outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.06-7.35; P > .99). Only indirect effects-those occurring remote from triggered stimulation-were associated with improved clinical outcomes (OR, infinity; 95% CI, -infinity to infinity; P = .02). These indirect effects included spontaneous ictal inhibition, frequency modulation, fragmentation, and ictal duration modulation. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that RNS effectiveness may be explained by long-term, stimulation-induced modulation of seizure network activity rather than by direct effects on each detected seizure.
Importance: A bidirectional brain-computer interface that performs neurostimulation has been shown to improve seizure control in patients with refractory epilepsy, but the therapeutic mechanism is unknown. Objective: To investigate whether electrographic effects of responsive neurostimulation (RNS), identified in electrocorticographic (ECOG) recordings from the device, are associated with patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective review of ECOG recordings and accompanying clinical meta-data from 11 consecutive patients with focal epilepsy who were implanted with a neurostimulation system between January 28, 2015, and June 6, 2017, with 22 to 112 weeks of follow-up. Recorded ECOG data were obtained from the manufacturer; additional system-generated meta-data, including recording and detection settings, were collected directly from the manufacturer's management system using an in-house, custom-built platform. Electrographic seizure patterns were identified in RNS recordings and evaluated in the time-frequency domain, which was locked to the onset of the seizure pattern. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patterns of electrophysiological modulation were identified and then classified according to their latency of onset in relation to triggered stimulation events. Seizure control after RNS implantation was assessed by 3 main variables: mean frequency of seizure occurrence, estimated mean severity of seizures, and mean duration of seizures. Overall seizure outcomes were evaluated by the extended Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale questionnaires, a patient-reported outcome measure of 3 domains (seizure characteristics, medication adverse effects, and quality of life), with a range of possible scores from 0 to 300 in which lower scores indicate worse status, and the Engel scale, which comprises 4 classes (I-IV) in which lower numbers indicate greater improvement. Results: Electrocorticographic data from 11 patients (8 female; mean [range] age, 35 [19-65] years; mean [range] duration of epilepsy, 19 [5-37] years) were analyzed. Two main categories of electrophysiological signatures of stimulation-induced modulation of the seizure network were discovered: direct and indirect effects. Direct effects included ictal inhibition and early frequency modulation but were not associated with improved clinical outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.06-7.35; P > .99). Only indirect effects-those occurring remote from triggered stimulation-were associated with improved clinical outcomes (OR, infinity; 95% CI, -infinity to infinity; P = .02). These indirect effects included spontaneous ictal inhibition, frequency modulation, fragmentation, and ictal duration modulation. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that RNS effectiveness may be explained by long-term, stimulation-induced modulation of seizure network activity rather than by direct effects on each detected seizure.
Authors: R P Lesser; S H Kim; L Beyderman; D L Miglioretti; W R Webber; M Bare; B Cysyk; G Krauss; B Gordon Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-12-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Robert S Fisher; J Helen Cross; Jacqueline A French; Norimichi Higurashi; Edouard Hirsch; Floor E Jansen; Lieven Lagae; Solomon L Moshé; Jukka Peltola; Eliane Roulet Perez; Ingrid E Scheffer; Sameer M Zuberi Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Barbara C Jobst; Ritu Kapur; Gregory L Barkley; Carl W Bazil; Michel J Berg; Gregory K Bergey; Jane G Boggs; Sydney S Cash; Andrew J Cole; Michael S Duchowny; Robert B Duckrow; Jonathan C Edwards; Stephan Eisenschenk; A James Fessler; Nathan B Fountain; Eric B Geller; Alica M Goldman; Robert R Goodman; Robert E Gross; Ryder P Gwinn; Christianne Heck; Aamr A Herekar; Lawrence J Hirsch; David King-Stephens; Douglas R Labar; W R Marsh; Kimford J Meador; Ian Miller; Eli M Mizrahi; Anthony M Murro; Dileep R Nair; Katherine H Noe; Piotr W Olejniczak; Yong D Park; Paul Rutecki; Vicenta Salanova; Raj D Sheth; Christopher Skidmore; Michael C Smith; David C Spencer; Shraddha Srinivasan; William Tatum; Paul Van Ness; David G Vossler; Robert E Wharen; Gregory A Worrell; Daniel Yoshor; Richard S Zimmerman; Tara L Skarpaas; Martha J Morrell Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Eric B Geller; Tara L Skarpaas; Robert E Gross; Robert R Goodman; Gregory L Barkley; Carl W Bazil; Michael J Berg; Gregory K Bergey; Sydney S Cash; Andrew J Cole; Robert B Duckrow; Jonathan C Edwards; Stephan Eisenschenk; James Fessler; Nathan B Fountain; Alicia M Goldman; Ryder P Gwinn; Christianne Heck; Aamar Herekar; Lawrence J Hirsch; Barbara C Jobst; David King-Stephens; Douglas R Labar; James W Leiphart; W Richard Marsh; Kimford J Meador; Eli M Mizrahi; Anthony M Murro; Dileep R Nair; Katherine H Noe; Yong D Park; Paul A Rutecki; Vicenta Salanova; Raj D Sheth; Donald C Shields; Christopher Skidmore; Michael C Smith; David C Spencer; Shraddha Srinivasan; William Tatum; Paul C Van Ness; David G Vossler; Robert E Wharen; Gregory A Worrell; Daniel Yoshor; Richard S Zimmerman; Kathy Cicora; Felice T Sun; Martha J Morrell Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Ana Luisa Velasco; Francisco Velasco; Marcos Velasco; José María Núñez; David Trejo; Israel García Journal: Int J Neural Syst Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.866
Authors: Uma R Mohan; Andrew J Watrous; Jonathan F Miller; Bradley C Lega; Michael R Sperling; Gregory A Worrell; Robert E Gross; Kareem A Zaghloul; Barbara C Jobst; Kathryn A Davis; Sameer A Sheth; Joel M Stein; Sandhitsu R Das; Richard Gorniak; Paul A Wanda; Daniel S Rizzuto; Michael J Kahana; Joshua Jacobs Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Bornali Kundu; Tyler S Davis; Brian Philip; Elliot H Smith; Amir Arain; Angela Peters; Blake Newman; Christopher R Butson; John D Rolston Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Davis P Argersinger; Stuart Walbridge; Nicholas M Wetjen; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Tianxia Wu; John A Butman; John D Heiss Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Angelique C Paulk; Rina Zelmann; Britni Crocker; Alik S Widge; Darin D Dougherty; Emad N Eskandar; Daniel S Weisholtz; R Mark Richardson; G Rees Cosgrove; Ziv M Williams; Sydney S Cash Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Nathaniel D Sisterson; Thomas A Wozny; Vasileios Kokkinos; Anto Bagic; Alexandra P Urban; R Mark Richardson Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2020-06