Literature DB >> 10691112

Subacute electrical stimulation of the hippocampus blocks intractable temporal lobe seizures and paroxysmal EEG activities.

M Velasco1, F Velasco, A L Velasco, B Boleaga, F Jimenez, F Brito, I Marquez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical, electroencephalographic (EEG), and histopathologic effects of subacute electrical stimulation of the hippocampal formation or gyrus (SAHCS) on 10 patients with intractable temporal lobe seizures.
METHODS: Bilateral, depth, hippocampal or unilateral, subdural, basotemporal electrodes were implanted in all 10 patients for a topographic diagnosis of the site and extent of the epileptic focus before a temporal lobectomy. In all patients, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were discontinued from 48 to 72 h before a program of continuous SAHCS, which was performed for 2-3 weeks. Stimulation parameters were biphasic Lilly wave pulses, 130/s in frequency, 450 micros in duration, and 200-400 microA in amplitude. The stimuli were delivered 23 of every 24 h for the 2-3-week SAHCS period. The effects of SAHCS on the number of clinical seizures per day and the percentage of interictal EEG spikes per 10-second samples of maximal paroxysmal activity at the epileptic focus were determined daily during the 16 days of SAHCS. At the completion of this program, patients underwent an en bloc temporal lobectomy, and the histopathologic effects of SAHCS on the stimulated tissue were analyzed by means of light-microscopy studies.
RESULTS: In seven patients whose stimulation electrode contacts were placed within the hippocampal formation or gyrus and who experienced no interruption in the stimulation program, SAHCS abolished clinical seizures and significantly decreased the number of interictal EEG spikes at the focus after 5-6 days. The most evident and fast responses were found by stimulating either the anterior pes hippocampus close to the amygdala or the anterior parahippocampal gyrus close to the entorhinal cortex. Other surface, hippocampal, and basotemporal EEG signs predicted and accompanied this antiepileptic response. These included an electropositive DC shift and monomorphic delta activity at the medial hippocampal and parahippocampal regions, and a normalization of the background EEG activity and signs of slow-wave sleep in surface. depth, and subdural regions. In contrast, no evident antiepileptic responses or no responses at all were found in three patients when stimulation was either interrupted or when it was administered outside the hippocampus. Light microscopy analysis of the stimulated hippocampal tissue showed histopathological abnormalities attributable to the depth-electrode penetration damage or to the pial surface reaction to the subdural, Silastic electrode plate. However, no evident histopathological differences were found between the stimulated and nonstimulated hippocampal tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: SAHCS appears to be a safe procedure that can suppress temporal lobe epileptogenesis with no additional damage to the stimulated tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10691112     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00135.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  42 in total

Review 1.  Working toward an epilepsy cure.

Authors:  Martha J Morrell
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Responsive cortical stimulation: the 21% solution?

Authors:  John W Miller Md
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.500

3.  Controlling bursting in cortical cultures with closed-loop multi-electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel A Wagenaar; Radhika Madhavan; Jerome Pine; Steve M Potter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The terminal man--from science fiction to therapy.

Authors:  Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.500

5.  Brain stimulation for epilepsy: stimulating results?

Authors:  Paul Garcia
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.500

6.  Frequency dependence of behavioral modulation by hippocampal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Giorgio La Corte; Yina Wei; Nick Chernyy; Bruce J Gluckman; Steven J Schiff
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Comparing spiking and slow wave activity from invasive electroencephalography in patients with and without seizures.

Authors:  Brian Nils Lundstrom; Christian Meisel; Jamie Van Gompel; Matt Stead; Greg Worrell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Study of the anti-seizure effects of low-frequency stimulation following kindling (a review of the cellular mechanism related to the anti-seizure effects of low-frequency electrical stimulation).

Authors:  Zohreh Ghotbeddin; Mahyar Janahmadi; Ali Yadollahpour
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Deep brain stimulation: a new approach to the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 10.  Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Felice T Sun; Martha J Morrell; Robert E Wharen
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.