| Literature DB >> 30979077 |
Abla Alzagameem1,2, Stephanie Elisabeth Klein3, Michel Bergs4, Xuan Tung Do5, Imke Korte6, Sophia Dohlen7, Carina Hüwe8, Judith Kreyenschmidt9, Birgit Kamm10,11, Michael Larkins12,13, Margit Schulze14.
Abstract
The antiradical and antimicrobial activity of lignin and lignin-based films are both of great interest for applications such as food packaging additives. The polyphenolic structure of lignin in addition to the presence of O-containing functional groups is potentially responsible for these activities. This study used DPPH assays to discuss the antiradical activity of HPMC/lignin and HPMC/lignin/chitosan films. The scavenging activity (SA) of both binary (HPMC/lignin) and ternary (HPMC/lignin/chitosan) systems was affected by the percentage of the added lignin: the 5% addition showed the highest activity and the 30% addition had the lowest. Both scavenging activity and antimicrobial activity are dependent on the biomass source showing the following trend: organosolv of softwood > kraft of softwood > organosolv of grass. Testing the antimicrobial activities of lignins and lignin-containing films showed high antimicrobial activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria at 35 °C and at low temperatures (0-7 °C). Purification of kraft lignin has a negative effect on the antimicrobial activity while storage has positive effect. The lignin release in the produced films affected the activity positively and the chitosan addition enhances the activity even more for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Testing the films against spoilage bacteria that grow at low temperatures revealed the activity of the 30% addition on HPMC/L1 film against both B. thermosphacta and P. fluorescens while L5 was active only against B. thermosphacta. In HPMC/lignin/chitosan films, the 5% addition exhibited activity against both B. thermosphacta and P. fluorescens.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; antiradical activity; chitosan; hydroxypropylmethylcellulose; lignin; organosolv; pathogenic microorganisms
Year: 2019 PMID: 30979077 PMCID: PMC6523900 DOI: 10.3390/polym11040670
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Lignin units H, G, and S derived from corresponding cinnamoyl alcohols.
Figure 2Most common monolignol linkages. First line: ether bonds (ß-O-4′, α-O-4′, 4-O-5′); second line: C–C bonds (ß-ß′, ß-1′, 5-5′), and third line: more complex linkages (ß-5′/ α-O-4′, 5-5′/ ß-O-4′/ α-O-4′, ß-1′/ ß-O-4′). Reprinted from [15] under open access license.
Inhibition zones of lignin samples against S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli obtained by disk diffusion method.
| Lignin Platelets | Bacteria | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| − | −− |
|
| + (max 1–2 mm) | ++ (max 5 mm) |
|
| − | + (max 1 mm) |
|
| − | + (max 1 mm), slight growth in inhibition zone |
|
| − | − |
|
| + (max 1 mm) | + (max 1–2 mm) |
|
| ++ (max 2–3 mm) | + (max 7 mm) |
|
| − | − |
−− = no inhibition, overgrowth of platelets; − = no inhibition; + = Inhibition; ++ = strong inhibition; max = maximum: measured at the greatest distance from the plate.
Compositional analysis according to National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) procedure of kraft lignin fractions (L1 to L4, purified via solvent extraction and PH2SK, isolated at pH2 without further purification).
| Fraction | AIL [%] | ASL [%] | Total Lignin [%] | Ash [%] | Glucan [%] | Xylan [%] | Galactan | Arabinan [%] | Rhamnan [%] | Mannan [%] | Sum [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 86.86 | 15.14 | 102.00 | 1.01 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 104.09 |
|
| 93.37 | 9.76 | 103.13 | 0.88 | 0.31 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 105.15 |
|
| 91.43 | 9.46 | 100.89 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 101.42 |
|
| 95.17 | 2.42 | 97.59 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 98.42 |
|
| 86.24 | 13.28 | 99.52 | 0.85 | 0.26 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 101.55 |
AIL = acid insoluble lignin; ASL = acid soluble lignin.
Figure 3HSQC of lignin purification fractions: L1, L2, L3, and L4.
Number of OH in the lignin fractions as determined by 31P NMR analysis.
| Aliphatic OH | Condensed-OH | G and Dimethylated-OH | Carboxylic Acids-OH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 8.70 | 5.04 | 6.30 | 0.59 |
|
| 8.52 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 0.00 |
|
| 3.81 | 2.99 | 2.91 | 0.16 |
|
| 3.17 | 0.48 | 1.79 | 0.15 |
|
| 3.02 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.02 |
|
| 7.32 | 7.11 | 9.73 | 3.10 |
* L5 has S–OH: 0.01.
The DPPH inhibitions of kraft lignin fractions (L1 to L4) and organosolv lignins obtained from spruce/pine (L5), beech (L6), and Miscanthus x giganteus (L7).
| L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | L7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 65.1 ± 3.7 | 66.8 ± 6.6 | 62.2 ± 9.5 | 68.2 ± 3.6 | 42 ± 1.9 | 64 ± 2.6 | 31 ± 1.0 |
Figure 4HPMC/lignin and HPMC/lignin/chitosan composite films.
Figure 5Antioxidant activity of HMPC/lignin and HPMC/lignin/chitosan films. The measurements were held in triplets. The red data labels indicate the highest activity for each lignin type. The yellow points relate to the standard deviation.
Figure 6Antimicrobial activity of HMPC/lignin and HPMC/lignin/chitosan films against S. aureus (above) and E. coli (below). All films are active against S. aureus. Columns in orange relate to nonactive films against E. coli. Chitosan incorporation increased the activity. L5 films showed highest activities against both bacteria.
Figure 7Antimicrobial activity of HMPC/lignin and HPMC/lignin/chitosan films against B. thermosphacta (above) and P. fluorescens (below). Columns in orange relate to nonactive films against P. fluorescens.