Literature DB >> 33562747

Lignins Isolated via Catalyst-Free Organosolv Pulping from Miscanthus x giganteus, M. sinensis, M. robustus and M. nagara: A Comparative Study.

Michel Bergs1,2, Yulia Monakhova3,4, Bernd W Diehl2, Christopher Konow5, Georg Völkering6, Ralf Pude6,7, Margit Schulze1.   

Abstract

As a low-input crop, Miscanthus offers numerous advantages that, in addition to agricultural applications, permits its exploitation for energy, fuel, and material production. Depending on the Miscanthus genotype, season, and harvest time as well as plant component (leaf versus stem), correlations between structure and properties of the corresponding isolated lignins differ. Here, a comparative study is presented between lignins isolated from M. x giganteus, M. sinensis, M. robustus and M. nagara using a catalyst-free organosolv pulping process. The lignins from different plant constituents are also compared regarding their similarities and differences regarding monolignol ratio and important linkages. Results showed that the plant genotype has the weakest influence on monolignol content and interunit linkages. In contrast, structural differences are more significant among lignins of different harvest time and/or season. Analyses were performed using fast and simple methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Data was assigned to four different linkages (A: β-O-4 linkage, B: phenylcoumaran, C: resinol, D: β-unsaturated ester). In conclusion, A content is particularly high in leaf-derived lignins at just under 70% and significantly lower in stem and mixture lignins at around 60% and almost 65%. The second most common linkage pattern is D in all isolated lignins, the proportion of which is also strongly dependent on the crop portion. Both stem and mixture lignins, have a relatively high share of approximately 20% or more (maximum is M. sinensis Sin2 with over 30%). In the leaf-derived lignins, the proportions are significantly lower on average. Stem samples should be chosen if the highest possible lignin content is desired, specifically from the M. x giganteus genotype, which revealed lignin contents up to 27%. Due to the better frost resistance and higher stem stability, M. nagara offers some advantages compared to M. x giganteus. Miscanthus crops are shown to be very attractive lignocellulose feedstock (LCF) for second generation biorefineries and lignin generation in Europe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Miscanthus nagara; Miscanthus robustus; Miscanthus sinensis; Miscanthus x giganteus; lignin; low-input crops; monolignol ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33562747      PMCID: PMC7915034          DOI: 10.3390/molecules26040842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


  38 in total

1.  Use of multivariate NMR analysis in the content prediction of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin in greenhouse crop residues.

Authors:  Luis M Aguilera-Sáez; Francisco M Arrabal-Campos; Ángel J Callejón-Ferre; María D Suárez Medina; Ignacio Fernández
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.072

2.  Intraspecific variation for CO2 compensation point and differential growth among variants in a C3-C4 intermediate plant.

Authors:  Paul Teese
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Fractionation and characterization of lignins from Miscanthus via organosolv and soda pulping for biorefinery applications.

Authors:  Ga-Hee Kim; Byung-Hwan Um
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.953

4.  Effect of different pretreatments on delignification pattern and enzymatic hydrolysability of miscanthus, oil palm biomass and typha grass.

Authors:  Yakindra Prasad Timilsena; Chandana Janaka Abeywickrama; Sudip Kumar Rakshit; Nicolas Brosse
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 5.  Lignin-Based Micro- and Nanomaterials and their Composites in Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Lin Dai; Chunlin Xu; Kai Wang; Chunyang Zheng; Chuanling Si
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 8.928

Review 6.  Paving the Way for Lignin Valorisation: Recent Advances in Bioengineering, Biorefining and Catalysis.

Authors:  Roberto Rinaldi; Robin Jastrzebski; Matthew T Clough; John Ralph; Marco Kennema; Pieter C A Bruijnincx; Bert M Weckhuysen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Winter cold-tolerance thresholds in field-grown Miscanthus hybrid rhizomes.

Authors:  Murilo de Melo Peixoto; Patrick Calvin Friesen; Rowan F Sage
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Progress on Optimizing Miscanthus Biomass Production for the European Bioeconomy: Results of the EU FP7 Project OPTIMISC.

Authors:  Iris Lewandowski; John Clifton-Brown; Luisa M Trindade; Gerard C van der Linden; Kai-Uwe Schwarz; Karl Müller-Sämann; Alexander Anisimov; C-L Chen; Oene Dolstra; Iain S Donnison; Kerrie Farrar; Simon Fonteyne; Graham Harding; Astley Hastings; Laurie M Huxley; Yasir Iqbal; Nikolay Khokhlov; Andreas Kiesel; Peter Lootens; Heike Meyer; Michal Mos; Hilde Muylle; Chris Nunn; Mensure Özgüven; Isabel Roldán-Ruiz; Heinrich Schüle; Ivan Tarakanov; Tim van der Weijde; Moritz Wagner; Qingguo Xi; Olena Kalinina
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Miscanthus x giganteus Stem Versus Leaf-Derived Lignins Differing in Monolignol Ratio and Linkage.

Authors:  Michel Bergs; Georg Völkering; Thorsten Kraska; Ralf Pude; Xuan Tung Do; Peter Kusch; Yulia Monakhova; Christopher Konow; Margit Schulze
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Chilling and frost tolerance in Miscanthus and Saccharum genotypes bred for cool temperate climates.

Authors:  Patrick C Friesen; Murilo M Peixoto; Florian A Busch; Daniel C Johnson; Rowan F Sage
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Sinking Our Teeth in Getting Dental Stem Cells to Clinics for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Sarah Hani Shoushrah; Janis Lisa Transfeld; Christian Horst Tonk; Dominik Büchner; Steffen Witzleben; Martin A Sieber; Margit Schulze; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.