| Literature DB >> 28112259 |
Ge-Gu Chen1, Gen-Que Fu1, Xiao-Jun Wang1, Xiao-Dong Gong2, Ya-Shuai Niu1, Feng Peng1, Chun-Li Yao1, Run-Cang Sun1.
Abstract
Biobased nanocomposite films for food packaging with high mechanical strength and good al">oxygen-barrier performance were developed using a hot-Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28112259 PMCID: PMC5253625 DOI: 10.1038/srep41075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) FT-IR spectra of HWE, MMT, and CMC. (b) FT-IR spectra of the representative nanocomposite films (F1-1.5, FCMC0.03, FCMC0.05, FCMC0.08, FCMC0.1).
Films with different proportions in volume of HWE, MMT, and CMC.
| Sample Code | Proportion |
|---|---|
| F1.5-1 | V(HWE)/V(MMT) = 1.5:1 |
| F1-1 | V(HWE)/V(MMT) = 1:1 |
| F1-1.5 | V(HWE)/V(MMT) = 1:1.5 |
| F1-2 | V(HWE)/V(MMT) = 1:2 |
| F1-2.5 | V(HWE)/V(MMT) = 1:2.5 |
| FCMC0.03 | V(HWE)/V(MMT)/V(CMC) = 1:1.5:0.03 |
| FCMC0.05 | V(HWE)/V(MMT)/V(CMC) = 1:1.5:0.05 |
| FCMC0.08 | V(HWE)/V(MMT)/V(CMC) = 1:1.5:0.08 |
| FCMC0.1 | V(HWE)/V(MMT)/V(CMC) = 1:1.5:0.1 |
αThe concentration of HWE was 5 wt%, and the concentrations of MMT and CMC were 2 wt%.
Figure 2The process of HWE and CMC intercalation in MMT.
Figure 3(a) X-ray diffraction patterns of HWE, MMT, and CMC. (b) The XRD patterns of the nanocomposite films F1-1.5, FCMC0.03, FCMC0.05, FCMC0.08, FCMC0.1.
Figure 4TEM micrographs of HWE-MMT based nanocomposite films: F1-1.5, FCMC0.05.
Figure 5SEM images of nanocomposite films prepared from hot-water wood extract, MMT, and CMC: (a) F1-1.5, (b) FCMC0.05.
Figure 6AFM images of the two nanocomposite films F1-1.5 and FCMC0.05.
(The scanning scale is 10 × 10 um).
Figure 7(a) Tensile-strain curves of the nanocomposite film HWE-MMT. (b) Tensile-strain curves of the nanocomposite film HWE-MMT-CMC.
Tensile testing results of the nanocomposite films.
| Samples | Tensile strength (MPa) | Tensile strain (%) | Thickness (um) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1.5-1 | 53.5 ± 6.3 | 2.1 ± 0.9 | 42.7 | ||
| F1-1 | 73.6 ± 7.1 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 48.1 | ||
| F1-1.5 | 75.4 ± 5.6 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 33.8 | ||
| F1-2 | 62.2 ± 4.7 | 2.7 ± 0.8 | 35.4 | ||
| F1-2.5 | 39.7 ± 4.3 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 36.3 | ||
| FCMC0.03 | 60.7 ± 6.9 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 35.9 | ||
| FCMC0.05 | 91.5 ± 4.0 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 36.0 | ||
| FCMC0.08 | 77.7 ± 8.2 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 36.1 | ||
| FCMC0.1 | 73.2 ± 3.4 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 36.7 | ||
| Quaternized hemicelluloses | MMT | 49–62 | 19.3–57.8 | 2.0–3.2 | |
| Wood hydrolysate | MMT/Talc | 100–200 | 61.0–77.6 | 2.1–4.7 | |
| Banana flour | MMT | 180 | 23.4–42.9 | 8.3–11.6 | |
Figure 8TGA (a) and DTG (b) curves of the representative films (F1.5-1, F1-1, F1-1.5, FCMC0.05).
Thermal properties of nanocomposites.
| Curve | T | Tmax (°C) | Residuals (wt%) at 700 °C |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1.5-1 | 181.3 | 218.2 | 80.5 |
| F1-1 | 186.1 | 221.1 | 83.5 |
| F1-1.5 | 188.4 | 224.8 | 84.4 |
| FCMC0.05 | 188.2 | 223.9 | 82.4 |
Oxygen Permeability (cm3 μm/day·m2·kPa) of the nanocomposite films.
| Sample | Thickness (um) | 23 °C 0% RH | 40 °C 0% RH |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1-1.5 | 33.8 | 0.65 | 0.98 |
| FCMC0.05 | 36.0 | 0.67 | 1.03 |
Figure 9The forming mechanism of the preparation of HWE-MMT based nanocomposite films.