Literature DB >> 30974032

Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.

C Prakash Gyawali1, Daniel Sifrim2, Dustin A Carlson3, Mary Hawn4, David A Katzka5, John E Pandolfino3, Roberto Penagini6,7, Sabine Roman8,9,10, Edoardo Savarino11, Roger Tatum12, Michel Vaezi13, John O Clarke14, George Triadafilopoulos14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a heterogenous minor motility disorder diagnosed when ≥50% ineffective peristaltic sequences (distal contractile integral <450 mm Hg cm s) coexist with normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure < upper limit of normal) on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). Ineffective esophageal motility is not consistently related to disease states or symptoms and may be seen in asymptomatic healthy individuals.
PURPOSE: A 1-day symposium of esophageal experts reviewed existing literature on IEM, and this review represents the conclusions from the symposium. Severe IEM (>70% ineffective sequences) is associated with higher esophageal reflux burden, particularly while supine, but milder variants do not progress over time or consistently impact quality of life. Ineffective esophageal motility can be further characterized using provocative maneuvers during HRM, especially multiple rapid swallows, where augmentation of smooth muscle contraction defines contraction reserve. The presence of contraction reserve may predict better prognosis, lesser reflux burden and confidence in a standard fundoplication for surgical management of reflux. Other provocative maneuvers (solid swallows, standardized test meal, rapid drink challenge) are useful to characterize bolus transit in IEM. No effective pharmacotherapy exists, and current managements target symptoms and concurrent reflux. Novel testing modalities (baseline and mucosal impedance, functional lumen imaging probe) show promise in elucidating pathophysiology and stratifying IEM phenotypes. Specific prokinetic agents targeting esophageal smooth muscle need to be developed for precision management.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraction reserve; dysphagia; gastroesophageal reflux disease; high-resolution manometry; ineffective esophageal motility; multiple rapid swallows

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30974032      PMCID: PMC9380027          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.960


  126 in total

1.  Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Monika A Kwiatek; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance can link PPI-responsive heartburn to reflux better than acid exposure time.

Authors:  L Frazzoni; M Frazzoni; N de Bortoli; S Tolone; M Furnari; I Martinucci; H Bertani; S Marchi; R Conigliaro; L Fuccio; V Savarino; E Savarino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Optimal number of multiple rapid swallows needed during high-resolution esophageal manometry for accurate prediction of contraction reserve.

Authors:  A Mauro; E Savarino; N De Bortoli; S Tolone; D Pugliese; M Franchina; C P Gyawali; R Penagini
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Esophagogastric junction and esophageal body contraction metrics on high-resolution manometry predict esophageal acid burden.

Authors:  A Rengarajan; A Bolkhir; P Gor; D Wang; S Munigala; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Acid normalization and improved esophageal motility after Nissen fundoplication: equivalent outcomes in patients with normal and ineffective esophageal motility.

Authors:  Narayanasamy Ravi; Nael Al-Sarraf; Tracey Moran; James O'Riordan; Suzanne Rowley; Patrick J Byrne; John V Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Can different subsets of ineffective esophageal motility influence the outcome of nissen fundoplication?

Authors:  Aleksandar P Simić; Ognjan M Skrobić; Richard R Gurski; Vladimir M Šljukić; Nenad R Ivanović; Predrag M Peško
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Ineffective esophageal motility phenotypes following fundoplication in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M D Mello; A R Shriver; Y Li; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Preoperative esophageal body motility does not influence the outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M Booth; J Stratford; T C B Dehn
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.429

10.  A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Esomeprazole Single Therapy Versus Mosapride and Esomeprazole Combined Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Ju Yup Lee; Sung Kook Kim; Kwang Bum Cho; Kyung Sik Park; Joong Goo Kwon; Jin Tae Jung; Eun Young Kim; Byung Ik Jang; Si Hyung Lee
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal Control of Esophageal Peristalsis and Its Role in Esophageal Disease.

Authors:  K Nikaki; A Sawada; A Ustaoglu; D Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-11-23

2.  Elimination of Dietary Triggers Is Successful in Treating Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Cesare Tosetti; Edoardo Savarino; Edoardo Benedetto; Rudi De Bastiani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Distension contraction plots of pharyngeal/esophageal peristalsis: next frontier in the assessment of esophageal motor function.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Ali Zifan; Charles Cock; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.871

Review 4.  Esophageal Motility Disorders: Current Approach to Diagnostics and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Rena Yadlapati; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 33.883

5.  Deep learning-based artificial intelligence model for identifying swallow types in esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Wenjun Kou; Galal Osama Galal; Matthew William Klug; Vladislav Mukhin; Dustin A Carlson; Mozziyar Etemadi; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.960

6.  Chicago Classification Version 4.0 and Its Impact on Current Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Joel E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2021-10

7.  Hard to Swallow Results.

Authors:  S Saboori; M Jarvis; J Baker; B Seminara; D Vickers; T Pacicco; B Moshiree
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0).

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella; Leonardo M Del Grande; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Effect of electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter in GERD patients with ineffective esophageal motility.

Authors:  Matthias Paireder; Ivan Kristo; Reza Asari; Gerd Jomrich; Johannes Steindl; Erwin Rieder; Sebastian F Schoppmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  High-Resolution Manometry-Observations After 15 Years of Personal Use-Has Advancement Reached a Plateau?

Authors:  Rami Sweis; Mark Fox
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.