Literature DB >> 26575034

Ineffective esophageal motility phenotypes following fundoplication in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

M D Mello1, A R Shriver1, Y Li1, A Patel1, C P Gyawali1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is associated with reflux disease, but its natural history is unclear. We evaluated patients undergoing repeat esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) for symptomatic presentations after antireflux surgery (ARS) to understand the progression of IEM.
METHODS: Patients with repeat HRM after ARS were included. Ineffective esophageal motility was diagnosed if ≥5 sequences had distal contractile integral (DCI) <450 mmHg cm s. Augmentation of DCI following multiple rapid swallows (MRS) was assessed. The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) was interrogated using the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI). Esophageal motor function was compared between patients with and without IEM. KEY
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (53.9 ± 1.8 years, 66.2% female) had pre- and post-ARS HRM studies 2.1 ± 0.19 years apart. Esophagogastric junction-CI augmented by a mean of 26.3% following ARS. Four IEM phenotypes were identified: 14.7% had persistent IEM, 8.8% resolved IEM after ARS, 19.1% developed new IEM, and 57.4% had no IEM at any point. Patients with IEM had a lower DCI pre- and post-ARS, lower pre-ARS EGJ CI, and lower pre-ARS-integrated relaxation pressure (p ≤ 0.02 for all comparisons); presenting symptoms and other EGJ metrics were similar (p ≥ 0.08 for all comparisons). The IEM phenotypes could be predicted by MRS DCI response patterns (p = 0.008 across groups); patients with persistent IEM had the least DCI augmentation (p = 0.007 compared to no IEM), while those who resolved IEM had DCI augmentation comparable to no IEM (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS &amp; INFERENCES: Distinct phenotypes of IEM exist among symptomatic reflux patients following ARS. Provocative testing with MRS may help identify these phenotypes pre-ARS.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastroesophageal reflux disease; high resolution manometry; ineffective esophageal motility; multiple rapid swallows

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26575034      PMCID: PMC4756919          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  27 in total

1.  Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  C Daum; R Sweis; E Kaufman; A Fuellemann; A Anggiansah; M Fried; M Fox
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Value of preoperative esophageal function studies before laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Walter W Chan; Laura R Haroian; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Oesophageal motility and bolus transit abnormalities increase in parallel with the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E Savarino; L Gemignani; D Pohl; P Zentilin; P Dulbecco; L Assandri; E Marabotto; D Bonfanti; S Inferrera; V Fazio; A Malesci; R Tutuian; V Savarino
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 4.  Esophageal manometry in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Michael Mello; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  Analysis of intersegmental trough and proximal latency of smooth muscle contraction using high-resolution esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Nitin Kumar; Ryan F Porter; Jake M Chanin; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Ineffective esophageal motility is a primary motility disorder in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Shih-Chi Ho; Chi-Sen Chang; Chun-Ying Wu; Gran-Hum Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Fundoplication improves disordered esophageal motility.

Authors:  T Ryan Heider; Kevin E Behrns; Mark J Koruda; Nicholas J Shaheen; Tananchai A Lucktong; Barbara Bradshaw; Timothy M Farrell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ-Contractile Integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non-responders.

Authors:  F Nicodème; M Pipa-Muniz; K Khanna; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Esophageal motor disease and reflux patterns in patients with advanced pulmonary disease undergoing lung transplant evaluation.

Authors:  J Seccombe; F Mirza; R Hachem; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Effects of age on the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motility, and reflux disease.

Authors:  Jacqueline Lee; Angela Anggiansah; Roy Anggiansah; Alasdair Young; Terry Wong; Mark Fox
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal Control of Esophageal Peristalsis and Its Role in Esophageal Disease.

Authors:  K Nikaki; A Sawada; A Ustaoglu; D Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-11-23

Review 2.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Joanne Li Shen Ooi; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

Review 3.  Utility of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice: First, Do HRM.

Authors:  Ishita Dhawan; Brendon O'Connell; Amit Patel; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman; Frank Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  High-Resolution Manometry Diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Is Associated with Higher Reflux Burden.

Authors:  Chanakyaram A Reddy; Jason R Baker; Joyee Lau; Joan W Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Do Vigorous Esophageal Contractions Contribute to Rigorous Phenotyping of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Samir Gupta; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

Review 8.  Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Daniel Sifrim; Dustin A Carlson; Mary Hawn; David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Roberto Penagini; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Roger Tatum; Michel Vaezi; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 9.  Ineffective esophageal motility and the vagus: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Ji-Hong Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-20

10.  A study of dysphagia symptoms and esophageal body function in children undergoing anti-reflux surgery.

Authors:  T Omari; F Connor; L McCall; L Ferris; S Ellison; B Hanson; R Abu-Assi; S Khurana; D Moore
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.