Literature DB >> 30971729

Genomic prediction of cognitive traits in childhood and adolescence.

A G Allegrini1, S Selzam2, K Rimfeld2, S von Stumm3, J B Pingault4, R Plomin2.   

Abstract

Recent advances in genomics are producing powerful DNA predictors of complex traits, especially cognitive abilities. Here, we leveraged summary statistics from the most recent genome-wide association studies of intelligence and educational attainment, with highly genetically correlated traits, to build prediction models of general cognitive ability and educational achievement. To this end, we compared the performances of multi-trait genomic and polygenic scoring methods. In a representative UK sample of 7,026 children at ages 12 and 16, we show that we can now predict up to 11% of the variance in intelligence and 16% in educational achievement. We also show that predictive power increases from age 12 to age 16 and that genomic predictions do not differ for girls and boys. We found that multi-trait genomic methods were effective in boosting predictive power. Prediction accuracy varied across polygenic score approaches, however results were similar for different multi-trait and polygenic score methods. We discuss general caveats of multi-trait methods and polygenic score prediction, and conclude that polygenic scores for educational attainment and intelligence are currently the most powerful predictors in the behavioural sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30971729      PMCID: PMC6986352          DOI: 10.1038/s41380-019-0394-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   15.992


  36 in total

1.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Genetic lotteries within families.

Authors:  Jason M Fletcher; Steven F Lehrer
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The nature of nurture: Effects of parental genotypes.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Michael L Frigge; Bjarni J Vilhjalmsson; Alexander I Young; Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson; Stefania Benonisdottir; Asmundur Oddsson; Bjarni V Halldorsson; Gisli Masson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Gyda Bjornsdottir; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Dissecting the genetics of complex traits using summary association statistics.

Authors:  Bogdan Pasaniuc; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Teresa Ferreira; Andrew P Morris; Sarah E Medland; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael N Weedon; Ruth J Loos; Timothy M Frayling; Mark I McCarthy; Joel N Hirschhorn; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  10 Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Naomi R Wray; Qian Zhang; Pamela Sklar; Mark I McCarthy; Matthew A Brown; Jian Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  PRSice: Polygenic Risk Score software.

Authors:  Jack Euesden; Cathryn M Lewis; Paul F O'Reilly
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Improving genetic prediction by leveraging genetic correlations among human diseases and traits.

Authors:  Robert M Maier; Zhihong Zhu; Sang Hong Lee; Maciej Trzaskowski; Douglas M Ruderfer; Eli A Stahl; Stephan Ripke; Naomi R Wray; Jian Yang; Peter M Visscher; Matthew R Robinson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Multi-polygenic score approach to trait prediction.

Authors:  E Krapohl; H Patel; S Newhouse; C J Curtis; S von Stumm; P S Dale; D Zabaneh; G Breen; P F O'Reilly; R Plomin
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood.

Authors:  Claire M A Haworth; Oliver S P Davis; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.587

View more
  33 in total

1.  Screening Human Embryos for Polygenic Traits Has Limited Utility.

Authors:  Ehud Karavani; Or Zuk; Danny Zeevi; Nir Barzilai; Nikos C Stefanis; Alex Hatzimanolis; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; Leonid Kruglyak; Gil Atzmon; Max Lam; Todd Lencz; Shai Carmi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Making the Most of Clumping and Thresholding for Polygenic Scores.

Authors:  Florian Privé; Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Hugues Aschard; Michael G B Blum
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Deconstructing the sources of genotype-phenotype associations in humans.

Authors:  Alexander I Young; Stefania Benonisdottir; Molly Przeworski; Augustine Kong
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Does the Inclusion of a Genome-Wide Polygenic Score Improve Early Risk Prediction for Later Language and Literacy Delay?

Authors:  Philip S Dale; Sophie von Stumm; Saskia Selzam; Marianna E Hayiou-Thomas
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Patterns of sociocognitive stratification and perinatal risk in the child brain.

Authors:  Dag Alnæs; Tobias Kaufmann; Andre F Marquand; Stephen M Smith; Lars T Westlye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Robust genetic nurture effects on education: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 38,654 families across 8 cohorts.

Authors:  Biyao Wang; Jessie R Baldwin; Tabea Schoeler; Rosa Cheesman; Wikus Barkhuizen; Frank Dudbridge; David Bann; Tim T Morris; Jean-Baptiste Pingault
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Twins Early Development Study: A Genetically Sensitive Investigation into Behavioral and Cognitive Development from Infancy to Emerging Adulthood.

Authors:  Kaili Rimfeld; Margherita Malanchini; Thomas Spargo; Gemma Spickernell; Saskia Selzam; Andrew McMillan; Philip S Dale; Thalia C Eley; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 1.587

8.  Evaluation of polygenic prediction methodology within a reference-standardized framework.

Authors:  Oliver Pain; Kylie P Glanville; Saskia P Hagenaars; Saskia Selzam; Anna E Fürtjes; Héléna A Gaspar; Jonathan R I Coleman; Kaili Rimfeld; Gerome Breen; Robert Plomin; Lasse Folkersen; Cathryn M Lewis
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  Cognitive ability and education: How behavioural genetic research has advanced our knowledge and understanding of their association.

Authors:  Margherita Malanchini; Kaili Rimfeld; Andrea G Allegrini; Stuart J Ritchie; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The practical utility of genetic screening in school settings.

Authors:  J Shero; W van Dijk; A Edwards; C Schatschneider; E J Solari; S A Hart
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.