Literature DB >> 25550326

PRSice: Polygenic Risk Score software.

Jack Euesden1, Cathryn M Lewis1, Paul F O'Reilly1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: A polygenic risk score (PRS) is a sum of trait-associated alleles across many genetic loci, typically weighted by effect sizes estimated from a genome-wide association study. The application of PRS has grown in recent years as their utility for detecting shared genetic aetiology among traits has become appreciated; PRS can also be used to establish the presence of a genetic signal in underpowered studies, to infer the genetic architecture of a trait, for screening in clinical trials, and can act as a biomarker for a phenotype. Here we present the first dedicated PRS software, PRSice ('precise'), for calculating, applying, evaluating and plotting the results of PRS. PRSice can calculate PRS at a large number of thresholds ("high resolution") to provide the best-fit PRS, as well as provide results calculated at broad P-value thresholds, can thin Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) according to linkage disequilibrium and P-value or use all SNPs, handles genotyped and imputed data, can calculate and incorporate ancestry-informative variables, and can apply PRS across multiple traits in a single run. We exemplify the use of PRSice via application to data on schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and smoking, illustrate the importance of identifying the best-fit PRS and estimate a P-value significance threshold for high-resolution PRS studies.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PRSice is written in R, including wrappers for bash data management scripts and PLINK-1.9 to minimize computational time. PRSice runs as a command-line program with a variety of user-options, and is freely available for download from http://PRSice.info CONTACT: jack.euesden@kcl.ac.uk or paul.oreilly@kcl.ac.uk SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25550326      PMCID: PMC4410663          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 Introduction

The polygenic model of human phenotypes has long been hypothesized, but only in recent years have the results from genome-wide association study (GWAS) revealed that much of the genetic basis for most complex traits comprises small effects of hundreds or even thousands of variants. For clinical outcomes, this polygenic effect can be considered a genetic liability to disease risk. While prediction of phenotype from an individual’s genetic profile is compromised by this polygenicity, the application of polygenic risk scores (PRS) has shown that prediction is sufficiently accurate for a number of applications. A PRS for an individual is a summation of their genotypes at variants genome-wide, weighted by effect sizes on a trait of interest. Effect sizes are typically estimated from published GWAS results, and only variants exceeding a P-value threshold, PT, are included (Dudbridge, 2013). Since even large GWAS achieve only marginal evidence for association for many causal variants, PRS are usually calculated at a set of P-value thresholds, e.g. . A common application of PRS is to test for shared genetic aetiology between traits. Here PRS on the base phenotype are calculated, using GWAS results, in individuals from an independent data set, and these are used as predictors of the target phenotype in a regression (see Supplementary Note S1). This technique was first applied by the International Schizophrenia Consortium (2009), demonstrating that genetic risk for schizophrenia (SCZ) is a predictor of bipolar disorder. This study also acted as a proof-of-principle for PRS, showing that PRS based on thousands of common variants genome-wide, including many with no effect and using effect size estimates from published GWAS, can provide a reliable indicator of genetic liability. This has motivated several other applications, including polygenic Mendelian Randomisation (Hung ), where causality of potential intermediate phenotypes in a disease pathway can be tested (Ehret ), use of PRS as biomarkers, and the enrolment of clinical trial participants according to risk (Hu ). Here we describe the first dedicated and fully automated software package for the application of PRS - PRSice. PRSice has a high-resolution option that returns the best-fit PRS, has a flexible set of user options intended to capture current standard practices in PRS studies and the different applications of PRS, and produces plots for inspection of results. We also perform a simulation study to estimate a P-value significance threshold for high-resolution PRS studies.

2 Overview of PRSice

PRSice has been developed to fully automate PRS analyses, substantially expanding the capability of PLINK-1.9 (Chang ). A key feature of PRSice is that it can calculate PRS at any number of P-value thresholds (PT) and can thus identify the most predictive (precise) threshold. It requires only GWAS results on a base phenotype and genotype data on a target phenotype as input (base and target phenotype may be the same); it outputs PRS for each individual and figures depicting the PRS model fit at a range of PT. PRSice allows users to include or remove SNPs in linkage disequilibrium, handles genotyped and imputed data, and can calculate ancestry-informative dimensions for use as covariates. These features integrate R code with computations performed in PLINK-1.9 and extensive bash scripts to minimize computational time. PRSice is a command-line program that allows users to apply a large number of PRS, under different parameter settings or across multiple base and target traits. In addition to the standard approach, there is an option to use summary statistics for the target as well as the base data, using the gtx package (Johnson, 2013). For future updates of PRSice, see the website: http://PRSice.info.

3 Results

Here we illustrate the use of PRSice to test for shared genetic aetiology between traits. We first investigate the genetic relationship between schizophrenia (SCZ) and major depressive disorder (MDD), both known to be complex and comorbid. We apply PRSice to replicate the finding by Smoller that SCZ PRS can predict MDD status, using the RADIANT-UK MDD case-control data set (Supplementary Note S2, Lewis ). Applying PRSice, we remove SNPs in linkage disequilibrium and include principal components to control for population structure. We find significant evidence that SCZ PRS predict MDD status, and under the approach of only testing PRS at several broad P-value thresholds find the most predictive threshold at PT = 0.05 (Fig. 1). Next we repeat the analysis using high-resolution PRS (Supplementary Note S3) and find the most predictive PRS at (Fig. 2). The PRS at explains 1.5% of the variation in MDD (Nagelkerke R2; ) whereas the high-resolution best-fit PRS explains 2.1% () and is based on 5252 fewer SNPs (12148 rather than 17400).
Fig. 1.

Bar plot from PRSice showing results at broad P-value thresholds for Schizophrenia PRS predicting MDD status. A bar for the best-fit PRS from the high-resolution run is also included

Fig. 2.

High-resolution PRSice plot for SCZ predicting MDD status. The thick line connects points at the broad P-value thresholds of Fig.1

Bar plot from PRSice showing results at broad P-value thresholds for Schizophrenia PRS predicting MDD status. A bar for the best-fit PRS from the high-resolution run is also included High-resolution PRSice plot for SCZ predicting MDD status. The thick line connects points at the broad P-value thresholds of Fig.1 Next we apply PRSice to two tobacco-related phenotypes from the TAG consortium (Thorgeirsson ) and the RADIANT-UK MDD data. These analyses reveal, for the first time, shared genetic aetiology between the dichotomous trait ‘ever smoked’ and MDD, but not between smoking consumption, as a quantitative trait, and MDD (Supplementary Fig. S1). In the former, high-resolution scoring again produces a substantially different best-fit PRS than that from broad PT, in terms of model fit, significance and number of SNPs included (Supplementary Fig. S1b). Under high-resolution PRS in particular, multiple tests are performed and so the P-value of the best-fit PRS will be inflated. Therefore, we perform a permutation study utilizing the SCZ and MDD data described above, and estimate an adjusted significance threshold for the best-fit PRS of P = 0.004 (Supplementary Note S4). Prior to a more extensive study, we suggest a more conservative significance threshold of P = 0.001 if using the best-fit PRS for association testing in PRS studies.

4 Discussion

Here we have described our PRSice software, illustrating its use with three PRS studies. We have illustrated the potential benefit of obtaining the best-fit PRS and have estimated a corresponding significance threshold. There is great potential for the future application of PRS in genetics: for gaining insights into the genetic architecture of a trait by comparing observed PRS with theoretical expectations across a range of PT (International Schizophrenia Consortium, 2009), for assessing the genetic overlap of a trait(s) across populations, for use as biomarkers, as instrumental variables, or even to provide evolutionary insights (Berg and Coop, 2014). The PRS approach, and PRSice software, could be extended to test the effects of copy number variants, epigenetic markers and more. We believe that PRSice can simplify PRS studies greatly, expand the application of PRS and aid the implementation of best-practice in PRS studies.

Funding

MRC studentship (to JE), EU FP7 no. 279227(PsychDPC), and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at SLaM and KCL. Conflict of Interest: none declared.
  10 in total

1.  The benefits of using genetic information to design prevention trials.

Authors:  Youna Hu; Li Li; Margaret G Ehm; Nan Bing; Kijoung Song; Matthew R Nelson; Philippa J Talmud; Aroon D Hingorani; Meena Kumari; Mika Kivimäki; Chun-Fang Xu; Dawn M Waterworth; John C Whittaker; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Cathie Spino; Hyun Min Kang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Genome-wide association study of major recurrent depression in the U.K. population.

Authors:  Cathryn M Lewis; Mandy Y Ng; Amy W Butler; Sarah Cohen-Woods; Rudolf Uher; Katrina Pirlo; Michael E Weale; Alexandra Schosser; Ursula M Paredes; Margarita Rivera; Nicholas Craddock; Mike J Owen; Lisa Jones; Ian Jones; Ania Korszun; Katherine J Aitchison; Jianxin Shi; John P Quinn; Alasdair Mackenzie; Peter Vollenweider; Gerard Waeber; Simon Heath; Mark Lathrop; Pierandrea Muglia; Michael R Barnes; John C Whittaker; Federica Tozzi; Florian Holsboer; Martin Preisig; Anne E Farmer; Gerome Breen; Ian W Craig; Peter McGuffin
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  Georg B Ehret; Patricia B Munroe; Kenneth M Rice; Murielle Bochud; Andrew D Johnson; Daniel I Chasman; Albert V Smith; Martin D Tobin; Germaine C Verwoert; Shih-Jen Hwang; Vasyl Pihur; Peter Vollenweider; Paul F O'Reilly; Najaf Amin; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Alexander Teumer; Nicole L Glazer; Lenore Launer; Jing Hua Zhao; Yurii Aulchenko; Simon Heath; Siim Sõber; Afshin Parsa; Jian'an Luan; Pankaj Arora; Abbas Dehghan; Feng Zhang; Gavin Lucas; Andrew A Hicks; Anne U Jackson; John F Peden; Toshiko Tanaka; Sarah H Wild; Igor Rudan; Wilmar Igl; Yuri Milaneschi; Alex N Parker; Cristiano Fava; John C Chambers; Ervin R Fox; Meena Kumari; Min Jin Go; Pim van der Harst; Wen Hong Linda Kao; Marketa Sjögren; D G Vinay; Myriam Alexander; Yasuharu Tabara; Sue Shaw-Hawkins; Peter H Whincup; Yongmei Liu; Gang Shi; Johanna Kuusisto; Bamidele Tayo; Mark Seielstad; Xueling Sim; Khanh-Dung Hoang Nguyen; Terho Lehtimäki; Giuseppe Matullo; Ying Wu; Tom R Gaunt; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Matthew N Cooper; Carl G P Platou; Elin Org; Rebecca Hardy; Santosh Dahgam; Jutta Palmen; Veronique Vitart; Peter S Braund; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Cuno S P M Uiterwaal; Adebowale Adeyemo; Walter Palmas; Harry Campbell; Barbara Ludwig; Maciej Tomaszewski; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Nicholette D Palmer; Thor Aspelund; Melissa Garcia; Yen-Pei C Chang; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Nanette I Steinle; Diederick E Grobbee; Dan E Arking; Sharon L Kardia; Alanna C Morrison; Dena Hernandez; Samer Najjar; Wendy L McArdle; David Hadley; Morris J Brown; John M Connell; Aroon D Hingorani; Ian N M Day; Debbie A Lawlor; John P Beilby; Robert W Lawrence; Robert Clarke; Jemma C Hopewell; Halit Ongen; Albert W Dreisbach; Yali Li; J Hunter Young; Joshua C Bis; Mika Kähönen; Jorma Viikari; Linda S Adair; Nanette R Lee; Ming-Huei Chen; Matthias Olden; Cristian Pattaro; Judith A Hoffman Bolton; Anna Köttgen; Sven Bergmann; Vincent Mooser; Nish Chaturvedi; Timothy M Frayling; Muhammad Islam; Tazeen H Jafar; Jeanette Erdmann; Smita R Kulkarni; Stefan R Bornstein; Jürgen Grässler; Leif Groop; Benjamin F Voight; Johannes Kettunen; Philip Howard; Andrew Taylor; Simonetta Guarrera; Fulvio Ricceri; Valur Emilsson; Andrew Plump; Inês Barroso; Kay-Tee Khaw; Alan B Weder; Steven C Hunt; Yan V Sun; Richard N Bergman; Francis S Collins; Lori L Bonnycastle; Laura J Scott; Heather M Stringham; Leena Peltonen; Markus Perola; Erkki Vartiainen; Stefan-Martin Brand; Jan A Staessen; Thomas J Wang; Paul R Burton; Maria Soler Artigas; Yanbin Dong; Harold Snieder; Xiaoling Wang; Haidong Zhu; Kurt K Lohman; Megan E Rudock; Susan R Heckbert; Nicholas L Smith; Kerri L Wiggins; Ayo Doumatey; Daniel Shriner; Gudrun Veldre; Margus Viigimaa; Sanjay Kinra; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Vikal Tripathy; Carl D Langefeld; Annika Rosengren; Dag S Thelle; Anna Maria Corsi; Andrew Singleton; Terrence Forrester; Gina Hilton; Colin A McKenzie; Tunde Salako; Naoharu Iwai; Yoshikuni Kita; Toshio Ogihara; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Tomonori Okamura; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Satoshi Umemura; Susana Eyheramendy; Thomas Meitinger; H-Erich Wichmann; Yoon Shin Cho; Hyung-Lae Kim; Jong-Young Lee; James Scott; Joban S Sehmi; Weihua Zhang; Bo Hedblad; Peter Nilsson; George Davey Smith; Andrew Wong; Narisu Narisu; Alena Stančáková; Leslie J Raffel; Jie Yao; Sekar Kathiresan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Stephen M Schwartz; M Arfan Ikram; W T Longstreth; Thomas H Mosley; Sudha Seshadri; Nick R G Shrine; Louise V Wain; Mario A Morken; Amy J Swift; Jaana Laitinen; Inga Prokopenko; Paavo Zitting; Jackie A Cooper; Steve E Humphries; John Danesh; Asif Rasheed; Anuj Goel; Anders Hamsten; Hugh Watkins; Stephan J L Bakker; Wiek H van Gilst; Charles S Janipalli; K Radha Mani; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Albert Hofman; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Ben A Oostra; Ayse Demirkan; Aaron Isaacs; Fernando Rivadeneira; Edward G Lakatta; Marco Orru; Angelo Scuteri; Mika Ala-Korpela; Antti J Kangas; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Pasi Soininen; Taru Tukiainen; Peter Würtz; Rick Twee-Hee Ong; Marcus Dörr; Heyo K Kroemer; Uwe Völker; Henry Völzke; Pilar Galan; Serge Hercberg; Mark Lathrop; Diana Zelenika; Panos Deloukas; Massimo Mangino; Tim D Spector; Guangju Zhai; James F Meschia; Michael A Nalls; Pankaj Sharma; Janos Terzic; M V Kranthi Kumar; Matthew Denniff; Ewa Zukowska-Szczechowska; Lynne E Wagenknecht; F Gerald R Fowkes; Fadi J Charchar; Peter E H Schwarz; Caroline Hayward; Xiuqing Guo; Charles Rotimi; Michiel L Bots; Eva Brand; Nilesh J Samani; Ozren Polasek; Philippa J Talmud; Fredrik Nyberg; Diana Kuh; Maris Laan; Kristian Hveem; Lyle J Palmer; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Juan P Casas; Karen L Mohlke; Paolo Vineis; Olli Raitakari; Santhi K Ganesh; Tien Y Wong; E Shyong Tai; Richard S Cooper; Markku Laakso; Dabeeru C Rao; Tamara B Harris; Richard W Morris; Anna F Dominiczak; Mika Kivimaki; Michael G Marmot; Tetsuro Miki; Danish Saleheen; Giriraj R Chandak; Josef Coresh; Gerjan Navis; Veikko Salomaa; Bok-Ghee Han; Xiaofeng Zhu; Jaspal S Kooner; Olle Melander; Paul M Ridker; Stefania Bandinelli; Ulf B Gyllensten; Alan F Wright; James F Wilson; Luigi Ferrucci; Martin Farrall; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Peter P Pramstaller; Roberto Elosua; Nicole Soranzo; Eric J G Sijbrands; David Altshuler; Ruth J F Loos; Alan R Shuldiner; Christian Gieger; Pierre Meneton; Andre G Uitterlinden; Nicholas J Wareham; Vilmundur Gudnason; Jerome I Rotter; Rainer Rettig; Manuela Uda; David P Strachan; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Jacques S Beckmann; Eric Boerwinkle; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael Boehnke; Martin G Larson; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Bruce M Psaty; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Aravinda Chakravarti; Paul Elliott; Cornelia M van Duijn; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Daniel Levy; Mark J Caulfield; Toby Johnson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets.

Authors:  Christopher C Chang; Carson C Chow; Laurent Cam Tellier; Shashaank Vattikuti; Shaun M Purcell; James J Lee
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.524

6.  Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Shaun M Purcell; Naomi R Wray; Jennifer L Stone; Peter M Visscher; Michael C O'Donovan; Patrick F Sullivan; Pamela Sklar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A common biological basis of obesity and nicotine addiction.

Authors:  T E Thorgeirsson; D F Gudbjartsson; P Sulem; S Besenbacher; U Styrkarsdottir; G Thorleifsson; G B Walters; H Furberg; P F Sullivan; J Marchini; M I McCarthy; V Steinthorsdottir; U Thorsteinsdottir; K Stefansson
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Relationship between obesity and the risk of clinically significant depression: Mendelian randomisation study.

Authors:  Chi-Fa Hung; Margarita Rivera; Nick Craddock; Michael J Owen; Michael Gill; Ania Korszun; Wolfgang Maier; Ole Mors; Martin Preisig; John P Rice; Marcella Rietschel; Lisa Jones; Lefkos Middleton; Kathy J Aitchison; Oliver S P Davis; Gerome Breen; Cathryn Lewis; Anne Farmer; Peter McGuffin
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jeremy J Berg; Graham Coop
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores.

Authors:  Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total
  472 in total

1.  Genetics and the geography of health, behaviour and attainment.

Authors:  Daniel W Belsky; Avshalom Caspi; Louise Arseneault; David L Corcoran; Benjamin W Domingue; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Renate M Houts; Jonathan S Mill; Terrie E Moffitt; Joseph Prinz; Karen Sugden; Jasmin Wertz; Benjamin Williams; Candice L Odgers
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-04-08

2.  Brain Heterogeneity in Schizophrenia and Its Association With Polygenic Risk.

Authors:  Dag Alnæs; Tobias Kaufmann; Dennis van der Meer; Aldo Córdova-Palomera; Jaroslav Rokicki; Torgeir Moberget; Francesco Bettella; Ingrid Agartz; Deanna M Barch; Alessandro Bertolino; Christine L Brandt; Simon Cervenka; Srdjan Djurovic; Nhat Trung Doan; Sarah Eisenacher; Helena Fatouros-Bergman; Lena Flyckt; Annabella Di Giorgio; Beathe Haatveit; Erik G Jönsson; Peter Kirsch; Martina J Lund; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Giulio Pergola; Emanuel Schwarz; Olav B Smeland; Tiziana Quarto; Mathias Zink; Ole A Andreassen; Lars T Westlye
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 3.  Genetic Risk Scores.

Authors:  Robert P Igo; Tyler G Kinzy; Jessica N Cooke Bailey
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2019-12

4.  Cross-Phenotype Polygenic Risk Score Analysis of Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms in U.S. Army Soldiers with Deployment-Acquired Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Renato Polimanti; Chia-Yen Chen; Robert J Ursano; Steven G Heeringa; Sonia Jain; Ronald C Kessler; Matthew K Nock; Jordan W Smoller; Xiaoying Sun; Joel Gelernter; Murray B Stein
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Genome-wide meta-analyses of stratified depression in Generation Scotland and UK Biobank.

Authors:  Lynsey S Hall; Mark J Adams; Aleix Arnau-Soler; Toni-Kim Clarke; David M Howard; Yanni Zeng; Gail Davies; Saskia P Hagenaars; Ana Maria Fernandez-Pujals; Jude Gibson; Eleanor M Wigmore; Thibaud S Boutin; Caroline Hayward; Generation Scotland; David J Porteous; Ian J Deary; Pippa A Thomson; Chris S Haley; Andrew M McIntosh
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Prediction of Schizophrenia Diagnosis by Integration of Genetically Correlated Conditions and Traits.

Authors:  Jingchun Chen; Jian-Shing Wu; Travis Mize; Dandan Shui; Xiangning Chen
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A genome-wide association study of IgM antibody against phosphorylcholine: shared genetics and phenotypic relationship to chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Xu Chen; Stefan Gustafsson; Thomas Whitington; Yan Borné; Erik Lorentzen; Jitong Sun; Peter Almgren; Jun Su; Robert Karlsson; Jie Song; Yi Lu; Yiqiang Zhan; Sara Hägg; Per Svensson; Karin E Smedby; Susan L Slager; Erik Ingelsson; Cecilia M Lindgren; Andrew P Morris; Olle Melander; Thomas Karlsson; Ulf de Faire; Kenneth Caidahl; Gunnar Engström; Lars Lind; Mikael C I Karlsson; Nancy L Pedersen; Johan Frostegård; Patrik K E Magnusson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease and functional brain connectivity in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Luiza Kvitko Axelrud; João Ricardo Sato; Marcos Leite Santoro; Fernanda Talarico; Daniel Samuel Pine; Luis Augusto Rohde; Andre Zugman; Edson Amaro Junior; Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan; Rodrigo Grassi-Oliveira; Pedro Mario Pan; Maurício Scopel Hoffmann; Andre Rafael Simioni; Salvador Martin Guinjoan; Hakon Hakonarson; Elisa Brietzke; Ary Gadelha; Renata Pellegrino da Silva; Marcelo Queiroz Hoexter; Euripedes Constantino Miguel; Sintia Iole Belangero; Giovanni Abrahão Salum
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Genetic factor common to schizophrenia and HIV infection is associated with risky sexual behavior: antagonistic vs. synergistic pleiotropic SNPs enriched for distinctly different biological functions.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Renato Polimanti; Henry R Kranzler; Lindsay A Farrer; Hongyu Zhao; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Copy Number Variants and Polygenic Risk Scores Predict Need of Care in Autism and/or ADHD Families.

Authors:  Sonja LaBianca; Jette LaBianca; Anne Katrine Pagsberg; Klaus Damgaard Jakobsen; Vivek Appadurai; Alfonso Buil; Thomas Werge
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.