Audrey H Calderwood1,2,3, Tor D Tosteson2,4, Louise C Walter5,6, Peiying Hua4, Tracy Onega7. 1. Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 2. Department of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth's Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Dartmouth's Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Data Science and Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth's Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is frequently performed in older adults, yet data on current use, and clinical outcomes of and follow-up recommendations after colonoscopy in older adults are lacking. METHODS: This was an observational study using the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry of adults age ≥65 years undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance of prior polyps, or evaluation of symptoms. The main outcomes were clinical findings of polyps and colorectal cancer and recommendations for future colonoscopy by age. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2019, there were 42,611 colonoscopies, of which 17,527 (41%) were screening, 19,025 (45%) surveillance, and 6059 (14%) for the evaluation of symptoms. Mean age was 71.1 years (SD 5.0), and 49.3% were male. The finding of colorectal cancer was rare (0.71%), with the highest incidence among diagnostic examinations (2.4%). The incidence of advanced polyps increased with patient age from 65-69 to ≥85 years for screening (7.1% to 13.6%; p = 0.05) and surveillance (9.4% to 12.0%; p < 0.001). Recommendations for future colonoscopy decreased with age and varied by findings at current colonoscopy. In patients without any significant findings, 85% aged 70-74 years, 61.9% aged 75-79 years, 39.1% aged 80-84 years, and 27.4% aged ≥85 years (p < 0.001) were told to continue colonoscopy. Among patients with advanced polyps, 97.2% aged 70-74 years, 89.6% aged 75-79 years, 78.4% aged 80-84 years, and 66.7% aged ≥85 years were told to continue colonoscopy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within this comprehensive statewide registry, clinical findings during colonoscopy varied by indication and increased with age. Overall rates of finding advanced polyps and colorectal cancer are low. Older adults are frequently recommended to continue colonoscopy despite advanced age and insignificant clinical findings on current examination. These data inform the potential benefits of ongoing colonoscopy, which must be weighed with the low but known potential immediate and long-term harms of colonoscopy, including cost, psychological distress, and long lag time to benefit exceeding life expectancy.
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is frequently performed in older adults, yet data on current use, and clinical outcomes of and follow-up recommendations after colonoscopy in older adults are lacking. METHODS: This was an observational study using the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry of adults age ≥65 years undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance of prior polyps, or evaluation of symptoms. The main outcomes were clinical findings of polyps and colorectal cancer and recommendations for future colonoscopy by age. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2019, there were 42,611 colonoscopies, of which 17,527 (41%) were screening, 19,025 (45%) surveillance, and 6059 (14%) for the evaluation of symptoms. Mean age was 71.1 years (SD 5.0), and 49.3% were male. The finding of colorectal cancer was rare (0.71%), with the highest incidence among diagnostic examinations (2.4%). The incidence of advanced polyps increased with patient age from 65-69 to ≥85 years for screening (7.1% to 13.6%; p = 0.05) and surveillance (9.4% to 12.0%; p < 0.001). Recommendations for future colonoscopy decreased with age and varied by findings at current colonoscopy. In patients without any significant findings, 85% aged 70-74 years, 61.9% aged 75-79 years, 39.1% aged 80-84 years, and 27.4% aged ≥85 years (p < 0.001) were told to continue colonoscopy. Among patients with advanced polyps, 97.2% aged 70-74 years, 89.6% aged 75-79 years, 78.4% aged 80-84 years, and 66.7% aged ≥85 years were told to continue colonoscopy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within this comprehensive statewide registry, clinical findings during colonoscopy varied by indication and increased with age. Overall rates of finding advanced polyps and colorectal cancer are low. Older adults are frequently recommended to continue colonoscopy despite advanced age and insignificant clinical findings on current examination. These data inform the potential benefits of ongoing colonoscopy, which must be weighed with the low but known potential immediate and long-term harms of colonoscopy, including cost, psychological distress, and long lag time to benefit exceeding life expectancy.
Authors: Mary Ann Greene; Lynn F Butterly; Martha Goodrich; Tracy Onega; John A Baron; David A Lieberman; Allen J Dietrich; Amitabh Srivastava Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Shivangi T Kothari; Robert J Huang; Aasma Shaukat; Deepak Agrawal; James L Buxbaum; Syed M Abbas Fehmi; Douglas S Fishman; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Mouen A Khashab; Laith H Jamil; Terry L Jue; Joanna K Law; Jeffrey K Lee; Mariam Naveed; Bashar J Qumseya; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nirav Thosani; Julie Yang; John M DeWitt; Sachin Wani Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Joseph C Anderson; Lynn F Butterly; Christina M Robinson; Martha Goodrich; Julia E Weiss Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Jennifer M Weiss; Maureen A Smith; Perry J Pickhardt; Sally A Kraft; Grace E Flood; David H Kim; Elizabeth Strutz; Patrick R Pfau Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Cynthia W Ko; Stacy Riffle; Leann Michaels; Cynthia Morris; Jennifer Holub; Jean A Shapiro; Marcia A Ciol; Michael B Kimmey; Laura C Seeff; David Lieberman Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Joseph C Anderson; Lynn F Butterly; Martha Goodrich; Christina M Robinson; Julia E Weiss Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Joseph C Anderson; Audrey H Calderwood; Brock C Christensen; Christina M Robinson; Christopher I Amos; Lynn Butterly Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Angela B Mariotto; Angela Meekins; Marie Topor; Martin L Brown; David F Ransohoff Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 25.391