| Literature DB >> 30962653 |
Zakia Alam1, Michiyo Higuchi2, Mohammad Abul Bashar Sarker3, Nobuyuki Hamajima4.
Abstract
In order to reduce child mortality, recommendations for diarrhea management practices have been widely promoted by various methods, including mass media. This study examined whether mother's exposure to mass media was associated with child's diarrhea, and with the diarrhea management practiced by their mothers. Data on 7,068 women, whose youngest child was under five years old, were extracted from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, 2011, together with information on the child. The outcome variables were an episode of diarrhea in the two weeks prior to the survey and diarrhea management practices; exposure to mass media was used as the major explanatory variable. They were descriptively summarized, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Television was found to be the most common form of media. Among 346 children who had experienced an episode of diarrhea in the previous 2 weeks, less than 42.5% were given zinc and only 26.3% of the mothers provided sufficient fluids. No significant associations between mother's mass media exposure and child's diarrhea were observed. Women who read newspapers/magazines were more likely to provide sufficient fluids and food, and those exposed to the radio were more likely to provide zinc supplementation. Since mother's exposure to newspaper/magazines and radio showed associations with some recommended practices for the treatment of childhood diarrhea, mass media clearly has the potential to improve diarrhea management practices. More effective use of mass media is anticipated; in particular, promotion of zinc supplementation and increasing fluid intake during diarrhea, neither of which were currently well practiced.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladesh; Demographic and Health Survey; child; diarrhea; mass media; oral rehydration therapy; zinc
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30962653 PMCID: PMC6433623 DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.81.1.31
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nagoya J Med Sci ISSN: 0027-7622 Impact factor: 1.131
Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers, and diarrheal episodes in their children (n=7,068)
| Characteristics | Total | Diarrheal episode | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||||
| Urban | 2,231 | 31.6 | 95 | 27.5 | 2,135 | 31.8 | 0.09 | ||
| Rural | 4,837 | 68.4 | 251 | 72.5 | 4,585 | 68.2 | |||
| ≤19 years | 986 | 14.0 | 50 | 14.5 | 936 | 13.9 | 0.72 | ||
| 20-29 years | 4,380 | 62.0 | 219 | 63.3 | 4,160 | 61.9 | |||
| ≥30 years | 1,702 | 24.1 | 77 | 22.3 | 1,624 | 24.2 | |||
| No education | 1,268 | 17.9 | 68 | 19.7 | 1,199 | 17.9 | 0.41 | ||
| Incomplete primary | 1,218 | 17.2 | 67 | 19.4 | 1,151 | 17.1 | |||
| Primary | 3,558 | 50.3 | 168 | 48.6 | 3,389 | 50.4 | |||
| Secondary or higher | 1,024 | 14.5 | 43 | 12.4 | 981 | 14.6 | |||
| Non-working | 6,359 | 90.0 | 309 | 89.3 | 6,049 | 90.0 | 0.67 | ||
| Working | 709 | 10.0 | 37 | 10.7 | 671 | 10.0 | |||
| Islam | 6,364 | 90.0 | 317 | 91.6 | 6045 | 90.0 | 0.31 | ||
| Other | 704 | 10.0 | 29 | 8.4 | 675 | 10.0 | |||
| Non-improved | 809 | 11.5 | 46 | 13.3 | 761 | 11.3 | 0.26 | ||
| Improved | 6,259 | 88.6 | 300 | 86.7 | 5,959 | 88.7 | |||
| Non-improved | 3,663 | 51.8 | 192 | 55.5 | 3,469 | 51.6 | 0.16 | ||
| Improved | 3,045 | 48.2 | 154 | 44.5 | 3,251 | 48.4 | |||
| Poorest | 1,470 | 20.8 | 76 | 22.0 | 1394 | 20.7 | 0.64 | ||
| Poorer | 1,346 | 19.0 | 67 | 19.4 | 1,279 | 19.0 | |||
| Middle | 1,358 | 19.2 | 71 | 20.5 | 1,286 | 19.1 | |||
| Richer | 1,415 | 20.0 | 71 | 20.5 | 1,343 | 20.0 | |||
| Richest | 1,479 | 20.9 | 61 | 17.6 | 1,418 | 21.1 | |||
Mass media exposure by place of residence
| Mass media exposure | Total | Place of residence | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban | Rural | ||||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||||
| Not exposed | 5,820 | 82.4 | 1,586 | 71.2 | 4,234 | 87.6 | <0.01 | ||
| Exposed | 1,241 | 17.6 | 641 | 28.8 | 600 | 12.4 | |||
| Not exposed | 6,412 | 90.8 | 2,077 | 93.2 | 4,335 | 89.6 | <0.01 | ||
| Exposed | 653 | 9.2 | 152 | 6.8 | 501 | 10.4 | |||
| Not exposed | 2,750 | 38.9 | 388 | 17.4 | 2,362 | 48.8 | <0.01 | ||
| Exposed | 4,317 | 61.1 | 1,843 | 82.6 | 2,474 | 51.2 | |||
Management practices during diarrhea by place of residence
| Management practice | Total | Place of residence | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban | Rural | ||||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||||
| Yes | 270 | 79.7 | 74 | 80.4 | 196 | 79.4 | 0.83 | ||
| No | 69 | 20.4 | 18 | 19.6 | 51 | 20.7 | |||
| Yes | 145 | 42.5 | 42 | 45.2 | 103 | 41.5 | 0.55 | ||
| No | 196 | 57.5 | 51 | 54.8 | 145 | 58.5 | |||
| Sufficient | 91 | 26.3 | 23 | 24.2 | 68 | 27.1 | 0.59 | ||
| Insufficient | 255 | 73.7 | 72 | 75.8 | 183 | 72.9 | |||
| Sufficient | 228 | 65.9 | 71 | 74.7 | 157 | 62.6 | 0.03 | ||
| Insufficient | 118 | 34.1 | 24 | 25.3 | 94 | 37.5 | |||
Logistic regression estimates for odds of diarrheal episodes according to mass media exposure
| Mass media exposure | Crude | Adjusted | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | OR1 | ||||
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | ||||
| Not exposed | 1 | 1 | |||
| Exposed | 1.07 | 0.63 | 1.14 | 0.38 | |
| (0.81–1.42) | (0.85–1.51) | ||||
| Not exposed | 1 | 1 | |||
| Exposed | 1.15 | 0.45 | 1.12 | 0.55 | |
| (0.81–1.64) | (0.78–1.59) | ||||
| Not exposed | 1 | 1 | |||
| Exposed | 0.93 | 0.55 | 0.98 | 0.88 | |
| (0.75–1.16) | (0.78–1.24) | ||||
1Adjusted for place of residence, mother’s age, education, working status, religion and honsehold’s wealth index
Reference was the ‘not exposed to media’ group (for all three media and combined media).
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio
Logistic regression estimates for odds of practices of diarrhea management according to mass media exposure
| Mass media exposure | Practices of diarrhea management | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORS and/or RHS | Zinc syrup and/or tablet | Amount of drink | Amount of food | ||||||||
| (n=339) | (n=341) | (n=346) | (n=346) | ||||||||
| aOR1 | aOR1 | aOR1 | aOR1 | ||||||||
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | ||||||||
| Not exposed | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Exposed | 2.09 | 0.08 | 1.46 | 0.19 | 2.11 | 0.02 | 3.17 | <0.01 | |||
| (0.92–4.72) | (0.82–2.60) | (1.14–3.91) | (1.51–6.65) | ||||||||
| Not exposed | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Exposed | 1.69 | 0.31 | 2.50 | 0.02 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 1.27 | 0.54 | |||
| (0.61–4.67) | (1.19–5.23) | (0.46–2.29) | (0.59–2.75) | ||||||||
| Not exposed | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Exposed | 1.04 | 0.90 | 1.34 | 0.22 | 1.67 | 0.07 | 1.27 | 0.33 | |||
| (0.58–1.88) | (0.83–2.17) | (0.97–2.88) | (0.78–2.07) | ||||||||
1Adjusted for place of residence, mother’s age, education, working status, religion and household’s wealth index
Reference was the ‘not exposed to media’ group (for all three media)
Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ORS, oral rehydration salt; RHS, recommended home solution