| Literature DB >> 32972377 |
Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale1, Alemneh Mekuriaw Liyew2, Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zinc has a tremendous advantage to save the life of children. It reduces the mean duration of diarrhea and mortality due to diarrhea. Besides, it reduces the severity of the initial episode, and also it prevents future diarrhea episodes. But there is low utilization of zinc for the management of diarrhea in under-five children in Ethiopia and there is a paucity of literature regarding the factors associated with the utilization.Entities:
Keywords: Diarrhea; Ethiopia; Under-five children; Zinc utilization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32972377 PMCID: PMC7513288 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09541-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Schematic presentation of under-five children with diarrhea included in the study
Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants
| Variables | Weighted frequency | percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Maternal age | ||
| 15–19 | 43 | 3.53 |
| 20–24 | 263 | 21.44 |
| 25–29 | 361 | 29.41 |
| 30–34 | 311 | 25.29 |
| 35–39 | 164 | 13.36 |
| 40–44 | 68 | 5.51 |
| 45–49 | 18 | 1.45 |
| Maternal education | ||
| Have no formal education | 767 | 62.46 |
| Have formal education | 461 | 37.54 |
| Marital status | ||
| Unmarried | 71 | 5.73 |
| Married | 1157 | 94.27 |
| Religion | ||
| Orthodox | 451 | 36.71 |
| Protestant | 314 | 25.57 |
| Muslim | 429 | 34.95 |
| Othersa | 34 | 2.77 |
| Maternal occupation | ||
| Not working | 649 | 52.82 |
| Working | 579 | 47.18 |
| Wealth status | ||
| Poor | 538 | 43.81 |
| Middle | 268 | 21.79 |
| Rich | 422 | 34.40 |
| Media exposure | ||
| No | 801 | 65.27 |
| Yes | 427 | 34.73 |
| Health insurance coverage | ||
| No | 1187 | 96.68 |
| Yes | 41 | 3.32 |
| Parity | ||
| Primiparous | 227 | 18.48 |
| Multiparous | 537 | 43.71 |
| Grand multiparous | 464 | 37.81 |
| Wanted the last child | ||
| No | 370 | 30.11 |
| Yes | 858 | 69.89 |
| Household size | ||
| < 5 | 382 | 31.13 |
| ≥ 5 | 846 | 68.87 |
| Sex of household head | ||
| Male | 1086 | 88.43 |
| Female | 142 | 11.57 |
| Distance from the health facility | ||
| Not a big problem | 512 | 41.72 |
| Big problem | 716 | 58.28 |
| Residence | ||
| Urban | 126 | 10.27 |
| Rural | 1102 | 89.73 |
| Region | ||
| Large central | 1147 | 93.47 |
| Small peripheral | 55 | 4.45 |
| Metropolitan | 26 | 2.08 |
a catholic, traditional, and other
Random effect and model comparison for factors associated with zinc utilization
| Parameter | Null model | Final model |
|---|---|---|
| ICC (%) | 18.5 (10.4–30.7) | 12.9 (5.7–26.4) |
| AIC | 1422.076 | 1381.848 |
| LL | − 709.038 | − 672.924 |
| Deviance | 1418.076 | 1345.848 |
AIC Akaike Information criteria, LL Loglikelihood
Factors associated with zinc utilization for management of diarrhea among under-five children, EDHS 2016
| Variables | Zinc utilization during Diarrhea | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | COR | AOR | |
| Maternal age | ||||
| 15–19 | 24 | 19 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 20–24 | 167 | 96 | 1.00 (0.48–2.08) | 1.04 (0.48–2.22) |
| 25–29 | 233 | 128 | 0.70 (0.34–1.44) | 0.84 (0.38–1.85) |
| 30–34 | 233 | 78 | 0.54 (0.26–1.14) | 0.80 (0.34–1.89) |
| 35–39 | 100 | 64 | 0.74 (0.34–1.59) | 1.17 (0.47–2.89) |
| 40–44 | 50 | 18 | 0.56 (0.22–1.43) | 0.97 (0.33–2.78) |
| 45–49 | 11 | 7 | 0.67 (0.16–2.74) | 1.42 (0.32–6.19) |
| Maternal education | ||||
| Have no formal education | 566 | 201 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Have formal education | 253 | 208 | 2.39 (1.79–3.21) | 1.83 (1.30–2.58) ** |
| Media exposure | ||||
| No | 575 | 226 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 244 | 183 | 2.06 (1.53–2.76) | 1.46 (1.04–2.04) * |
| Health insurance coverage | ||||
| No | 797 | 390 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 22 | 19 | 1.81 (0.83–3.94) | 1.58 (0.72–3.48) |
| Parity | ||||
| Primiparous | 146 | 81 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Multiparous | 341 | 196 | 0.75 (0.51–1.11) | 1.30 (0.82–2.04) |
| Grand multiparous | 332 | 132 | 0.52 (0.35–0.78) | 1.40 (0.76–2.59) |
| Household size | ||||
| < 5 | 234 | 148 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| ≥ 5 | 586 | 260 | 0.51 (0.38–0.69) | 0.57 (0.39–0.82) ** |
| Distance from the health facility | ||||
| Not a big problem | 327 | 185 | 1.70 (1.27–2.27) | 1.28 (0.95–1.74) |
| Big problem | 493 | 223 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 62 | 64 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Rural | 757 | 345 | 0.37 (0.25–0.55) | 0.71 (0.44–1.14) |
| Region | ||||
| Large central | 770 | 377 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Small peripheral | 34 | 21 | 1.20 (0.85–1.70) | 131 (0.92–1.87) |
| Metropolitan | 15 | 11 | 2.02 (1.28–3.19) | 1.43 (0.88–2.32) |
AOR Adjusted Odds Ratio, COR Crude Odds Ratio, * = P < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01