| Literature DB >> 32974015 |
Md Nuruzzaman Khan1,2, Melissa L Harris3, Christopher Oldmeadow3, Deborah Loxton3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Around 48% of all pregnancies in low- and middle-income countries are unintended. Unintended pregnancy may contribute to lower use of antenatal care (ANC); however, current research in the area is largely inconclusive due to the methodological approaches applied.Entities:
Keywords: Antenatal care uptake; Bangladesh; Informative Bayesian approach; Multilevel logistic regression model; Unintended pregnancy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32974015 PMCID: PMC7493902 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-020-00468-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Background characteristics of the study population, BDHS 2014 (weighted sample N = 4493)
| Characteristics | Subject (N) | Estimates (mean ± SD or proportion (95% CI)) |
|---|---|---|
| Age at most recent birth given, years | 4493 | 23.6 (5.7) |
| Education, years | 4493 | 6.3 (3.8) |
| Total number of children | 4493 | 2.16 (1.4) |
| Engagement in formal employment | 4493 | 23.9 (21.6–25.9) |
| Pregnancy intention (most recent birth) | ||
| Wanted | 3362 | 74.1 (71.3–76.7) |
| | 26.0 (23.3–28.8) | |
| Mistimed | 670 | 15.1 (13.4–16.8) |
| Unwanted | 461 | 10.9 (9.4–12.6) |
| Antenatal care services visit | ||
| At least one visit | 2927 | 63.8 (60.4–67.1) |
| Four or more visits | 1188 | 31.5 (28.8–34.5) |
Fig. 1At least one and four or more antenatal care uptake in Bangladesh across the intention of women’s last pregnancy based on BDHS, 2014 data
Uptake of at least one skilled antenatal care visit and at least four skilled antenatal care visits, by selected characteristics, 2014 BDHS (weighted sample N = 4493)
| Characteristics | Prevalence (95% confidence interval) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At least one skilled antenatal care ( | Four and more skilled antenatal care ( | |||
| Wanted | 49.3 (45.6–52.8) | 25.9 (23.0–19.0) | ||
| Mistimed | 8.7 (7.8–9.7) | 3.9 (3.2–4.8) | ||
| Unwanted | 5.8 (5.0–6.7) | 1.8 (1.1–2.7) | ||
| No education | 5.5 (4.7–6.5) | 1.6 (1.0–2.6) | ||
| Primary | 14.4 (13.2–15.8) | 4.9 (4.0–5.9) | ||
| Secondary | 3.5 (31.9–37.4) | 17.8 (15.7–20.1) | ||
| Higher | 9.2 (8.1–10.6) | 7.3 (6.2–8.5) | ||
| ≤ 19 | 17.9 (16.1–19.8) | 8.3 (7.0–9.8) | ||
| 20–34 | 43.3 (40.8–45.8) | 22.2 (20.1–24.5) | ||
| ≥ 35 | 2.6 (2.0–3.2) | 1.1 (0.7–1.5) | ||
| 0.783 | 0.215 | |||
| Yes | 49.7 (43.7–55.8) | 28.1 (25.5–30.9) | ||
| No | 50.6 (47.4–53.7) | 24.3 (19.2–30.2) | ||
| No education | 10.2 (9.1–11.4) | 3.0 (2.4–3.9) | ||
| Primary education | 16.7 (14.9–18.7) | 6.5 (5.3–7.8) | ||
| Secondary education | 23.9 (21.9–26.1) | 12.5 (10.1–14.4) | ||
| Higher education | 12.9 (11.4–14.5) | 9.6 (8.2–11.1) | ||
| Agricultural workers | 12.2 (10.6–13.9) | 4.4 (3.4–5.5) | ||
| Physical labourer | 28.9 (26.4–31.1) | 14.2 (12.7–15.9) | ||
| Service worker | 5.2 (4.3–6.2) | 4.2 (3.3–5.2) | ||
| Business person | 15.8 (14.4–17.3) | 7.7 (6.6–9.0) | ||
| Others | 2.0 (1.4–2.9) | 1.1 (0.5–2.1) | ||
| ≤ 2 | 47.9 (44.5–51.3) | 25.6 (22.9–28.6) | ||
| > 2 | 15.9 (14.6–17.2) | 5.9 (5.0–7.0) | ||
| Not exposed | 17.5 (15.8–19.3) | 5.0 (4.1–6.2) | ||
| Moderately exposed | 34.3 (31.8–36.8) | 17.6 (15.8–19.4) | ||
| Highly exposed | 12.0 (10.5–13.6) | 9.0 (7.6–10.5) | ||
| Poorest | 7.7 (6.6–8.9) | 1.9 (1.5–2.6) | ||
| Poorer | 10.6 (9.4–11.8) | 3.4 (2.7–4.3) | ||
| Middle | 12.3 (11.1–13.7) | 4.5 (3.7–5.4) | ||
| Richer | 15.5 (13.7–17.4) | 8.7 (7.4–10.1) | ||
| Richest | 17.7 (15.5–20.2) | 13.1 (11.1–15.3) | ||
| Urban | 20.5 (18.4–22.8) | 13.6 (11.8–15.6) | ||
| Rural | 43.2 (40.5–46.0) | 18.0 (15.9–20.2) | ||
| Barishal | 3.4 (2.6–4.3) | 1.5 (1.0–2.2) | ||
| Chattogram | 14.4 (12.4–16.7) | 6.3 (5.1–7.8) | ||
| Dhaka | 22.7 (20.8–24.7) | 12.0 (10.3–14.1) | ||
| Khulna | 5.9 (5.1–6.8) | 3.3 (2.6–4.2) | ||
| Rajshahi | 6.4 (5.5–7.5) | 2.9 (2.3–3.8) | ||
| Rangpur | 6.1 (5.1–7.2) | 3.5 (2.8–4.4) | ||
| Sylhet | 4.9 (3.7–6.5) | 2.0 (1.4–3.0) | ||
| Low (≤25%) | 7.0 (5.3–9.2) | 1.7 (1.2–2.5) | ||
| Moderate (26–50%) | 30.1 (26.7–33.9) | 14.4 (12.3–16.7) | ||
| High (> 50%) | 26.6 (22.7–31.0) | 15.5 (12.8–18.5) | ||
| High | 5. 3 (3.4–7.3) | 2.7 (1.7–4.3) | ||
| Moderate | 16.8 (13.8–20.3) | 7.3 (5.9–9.1) | ||
| Low | 22.6 (19.6–25.8) | 8.4 (6.9–10.3) | ||
| Middle-to-richest | 19.4 (16.4–22.8) | 13.2 (10.9–15.9) | ||
| High (> 50%) | 39.1 (36.7–41.6) | 16.9 (15.1–18.9) | ||
| Low (≤50%) | 24.7 (22.5–27.1) | 14.7 (12.0–17.9) | ||
Note: +Women living in a community consisting of only women in the top three wealth quintiles were categorized as living in a “middle-to-richest” community; all other women were categorized on the basis of the proportion of household in their community in the lowest two wealth quintiles: low (25%), moderate (26–50%) and high (> 50%)
Multilevel modelling with Bayesian informative approach to determine the associated with at least one skilled antenatal care uptake and four or more skilled antenatal care uptake in Bangladesh for the year 2014 (using 2014 BDHS)
| At least one skilled antenatal care uptake, aOR (95% Cred. I) | Four or more skilled antenatal care uptake, aOR (95% Cred. I) | |
|---|---|---|
| Most recent pregnancy: wanted (ref) | ||
| Mistimed pregnancy | 0.59 (0.53–0.65) | 0.73 (0.66–0.81) |
| Unwanted pregnancy | 0.67 (0.61–0.74) | 0.69 (0.64–0.75) |
| Women’s education: illiterate (ref) | ||
| Primary | 1.66 (1.39–1.94) | 0.97 (0.91–1.03) |
| Secondary | 1.88 (1.61–2.12) | 1.21 (1.10–1.33) |
| Higher | 1.25 (1.11–1.41) | 1.85 (1.71–2.00) |
| Husband’s education: illiterate (ref) | ||
| Primary | 1.00 (0.91–1.09) | 1.42 (1.29–1.55) |
| Secondary | 1.25 (1.12–1.41) | 1.60 (1.48–1.73) |
| Higher | 1.19 (1.06–1.33) | 1.62 (1.50–1.76) |
| Total number of children ever born: ≤2 (ref) | ||
| > 2 | 1.04 (0.91–1.22) | 0.79 (0.71–0.86) |
| Age at last birth given: ≤ 19 (ref) | ||
| 20–34 | 1.20 (1.07–1.31) | 0.91 (0.84–0.96) |
| ≥ 35 | 1.58 (1.41–1.76) | 1.09 (0.98–1.21) |
| Quality of antenatal care | 0.9 (0.08–0.10) | 0.40 (0.38–0.41) |
| Husband’s occupation: agricultural worker (ref) | ||
| Physical labourer | 1.06 (0.98–1.16) | 1.61 (1.49–1.74) |
| Services | 1.74 (1.49–2.01) | 2.52 (2.29–2.76) |
| Business | 2.12 (1.89–2.37) | 1.54 (1.40–1.73) |
| Others | 2.17 (1.89–2.45) | 2.03 (1.73–2.32) |
| Exposure to mass media: not exposed (ref) | ||
| Moderately exposed | 0.91 (0.79–1.04) | 1.09 (1.00–1.18) |
| Highly exposed | 0.92 (0.82–1.01) | 1.21 (1.15–1.27) |
| Wealth status: poorest (ref) | ||
| Poorer | 3.31 (2.80–3.81) | 1.44 (1.27–1.65) |
| Middle | 1.85 (1.64–2.07) | 1.52 (1.43–1.60) |
| Richer | 1.71 (1.48–1.98) | 1.53 (1.38–1.69) |
| Richest | 1.83 (1.59–2.07) | 1.78 (1.69–1.87) |
| Place of residence: urban (ref) | ||
| Rural | 0.61 (0.56–0.67) | 0.67 (0.62–0.72) |
| Region of residence: Barishal (ref) | ||
| Chattogram | 3.46 (3.09–3.87) | 0.90 (0.82–0.98) |
| Dhaka | 2.50 (2.12–2.93) | 0.98 (0.92–1.05) |
| Khulna | 2.69 (2.29–3.14) | 1.20 (1.11–1.31) |
| Rajshahi | 4.20 (3.61–4.82) | 1.15 (0.98–1.33) |
| Rangpur | 3.65 (3.12–4.20) | 1.10 (1.02–1.18) |
| Sylhet | 3.00 (2.75–3.27) | 1.15 (1.08–1.23) |
| Community-level literacy: low (≤25%, ref) | ||
| Moderate (25–50%) | 0.86 (0.75–0.99) | 1.37 (1.28–1.47) |
| High (> 50%) | 1.04 (0.92–1.17) | 1.42 (1.28–1.59) |
| Community-level poverty+: high (> 50%, ref) | ||
| Moderate (25–50%) | 1.24 (1.07–1.42) | 0.94 (0.85–1.03) |
| Low (< 25%) | 1.41 (1.22–1.63) | 0.97 (0.88–1.08) |
| Middle-to- richest | 0.67 (0.61–0.75) | 0.86 (0.78–0.95) |
| Community-level at least four skilled antenatal care visits (> 50%) | ||
| Low (< 50%) | 0.78 (0.70–0.87) | 0.19 (0.18–0.0.20) |
| Constant | 2.81 (2.50–3.14) | 0.36 (0.33–0.39) |
| Intra-class correlation (ICC, cluster level) | 1.70e-17 | 0.60 |
| AIC | 3455.26 | 3455.25 |
| BIC | 3689.52 | 3689.52 |
Note: Ref reference group, aOR Adjusted Odds Ratio, Cred. I Credible Interval, estimates were based on informative Bayesian approach with multilevel logistic regression modelling. An informative prior distribution for the regression coefficients was constructed by first fitting separate Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models with non-informative priors (mean = 0, variance = 10,000) to each of the 2004, 2007 and 2011 BDHSs; AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; ICC, Intra-class correlation. +Women living in a community consisting of only women in the top three wealth quintiles were categorized as living in a “middle-to-richest” community; all other women were categorized on the basis of the proportion of household in their community in the lowest two wealth quintiles: low (25%), moderate (26–50%) and high (> 50%). To see the results for each model, see supplementary Tables 1 and 2