| Literature DB >> 34690501 |
Obasanjo Afolabi Bolarinwa1,2, Zemenu Tadesse Tessema3, James Boadu Frimpong4, Abdul-Aziz Seidu5,6, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is one of the health problems contributing to Nigeria's under-5 mortality rate, ranked as the eighth highest globally. As our search is concerned, there is limited evidence on the spatial distribution of childhood diarrhea in Nigeria. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the spatial distribution and predictors of diarrhea among under-5 children in Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Diarrhea; Nigeria; child Health; multilevel analysis; public health; spatial analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34690501 PMCID: PMC8529312 DOI: 10.1177/11786302211045286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Insights ISSN: 1178-6302
Individual and contextual level characteristics of respondents (n = 28 583).
| Variable | Weighted frequency | Weighted percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Individual-level | ||
| Age of child (in months) | ||
| 0-11 months | 6001 | 20.99 |
| 12-23 months | 5664 | 19.82 |
| 24-35 months | 5405 | 18.91 |
| 36-47 months | 5716 | 20.00 |
| 48-59 months | 5797 | 20.28 |
| Sex of child | ||
| Male | 14 516 | 50.79 |
| Female | 14 067 | 49.21 |
| Source of drinking water | ||
| Unimproved | 10 108 | 35.36 |
| Improved | 18 475 | 64.64 |
| Type of toilet facility | ||
| Unimproved | 13 676 | 47.85 |
| Improved | 14 907 | 52.15 |
| Maternal age | ||
| 15-24 | 6544 | 22.89 |
| 25-34 | 14 788 | 51.74 |
| 35 and above | 7252 | 25.37 |
| Maternal educational level | ||
| No education | 13 154 | 46.02 |
| Primary education | 4200 | 14.69 |
| Secondary and above | 11 229 | 39.28 |
| Partner’s educational level | ||
| No education | 10 344 | 36.19 |
| Primary education | 3987 | 13.95 |
| Secondary and above | 14 252 | 49.86 |
| Currently working | ||
| No | 9244 | 32.34 |
| Yes | 19 339 | 67.66 |
| Parity | ||
| 1 | 2937 | 10.24 |
| 2 | 5398 | 18.89 |
| 3 | 4971 | 17.39 |
| 4 and above | 15 287 | 53.48 |
| Religious affiliation | ||
| Christianity | 10 265 | 35.91 |
| Islam | 18 162 | 63.54 |
| Traditionalist and others | 157 | 0.55 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Hausa | 13 045 | 45.64 |
| Yoruba | 3238 | 11.33 |
| Igbo | 3600 | 12.59 |
| Others | 8700 | 30.44 |
| Media exposure | ||
| No | 10 971 | 38.38 |
| Yes | 17 612 | 61.62 |
| Contextual level factors | ||
| Region | ||
| Urban | 11 131 | 38.94 |
| Rural | 17 452 | 61.06 |
| Wealth index | ||
| Poorest | 6285 | 21.99 |
| Poorer | 6269 | 21.93 |
| Middle | 5812 | 20.33 |
| Richer | 5306 | 18.56 |
| Richest | 4911 | 17.18 |
| Region | ||
| North central | 3972 | 13.90 |
| North East | 5198 | 18.19 |
| North west | 10 335 | 36.16 |
| South east | 2819 | 9.86 |
| South south | 2443 | 8.55 |
| South west | 3816 | 13.35 |
| Sex of household head | ||
| Male | 26 723 | 93.49 |
| Female | 1861 | 6.51 |
| Community literacy level | ||
| Low | 9474 | 33.15 |
| Medium | 9362 | 32.75 |
| High | 9747 | 34.10 |
| Community Socioeconomic status | ||
| Low | 17 000 | 59.47 |
| Medium | 1333 | 4.67 |
| High | 10 250 | 35.86 |
NDHS, 2018.
Figure 1.Spatial distribution of diarrhea disease among children in Nigeria, 2018.
Figure 2.Spatial autocorrelation of results of diarrhea disease among children in Nigeria, 2018.
Figure 3.Hot spot analysis of diarrhea disease among children in Nigeria, 2018.
Figure 4.Spatial prediction of childhood diarrhea disease in Nigeria, 2018.
SaTScan analysis result of diarrhea disease among children in Nigeria, 2018.
| Cluster | Enumeration area (cluster) identified | Coordinate/radius | Population | Case | RR | LLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177 | (11.301940N, 10.466170E)/223.21 km | 5676 | 1527 | 2.10 | 290 | <.001 |
| 2 | 137 | (11.704190N, 11.092290E)/213.03 km | 3932 | 1178 | 2.23 | 290 | <.001 |
| 3 | 54 | (8.347721N, 10.408740E)/166.95 km | 1043 | 233 | 1.41 | 14.3 | .0014 |
Figure 5.The SaTScan analysis map of diarrhea disease among children in Nigeria, 2018.
Multilevel logistic regression models for individual and contextual level predictors of childhood diarrhea in Nigeria.
| Variables | Model 0 | Model I | Model II | Model III |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 28 583 | aOR (95%CI) | aOR (95%CI) | aOR (95%CI) | |
| Fixed effects results | ||||
| Individual-level variables | ||||
| Age of child (in months) | ||||
| 0-11 months | RC | RC | ||
| 12-23 months | 1.55 | 1.54 | ||
| 24-35 months | 0.93 (0.83-1.05) | 0.93 (0.83-1.05) | ||
| 36-47 months | 0.55 | 0.55 | ||
| 48-59 months | 0.38 | 0.37 | ||
| Sex of child | ||||
| Male | RC | RC | ||
| Female | 0.97 (0.91-1.05) | 0.97 (0.90-1.05) | ||
| Source of drinking water | ||||
| Unimproved | RC | RC | ||
| Improved | 0.93 | 1.04 (0.94-1.15) | ||
| Type of toilet facility | ||||
| Unimproved | RC | RC | ||
| Improved | 0.88 (0.80-0.97) | 0.96 (0.87-1.07) | ||
| Maternal age | ||||
| 15-24 | RC | RC | ||
| 25-34 | 0.86 | 0.91 (0.81-1.02) | ||
| 35 and above | 0.82 | 0.89 (0.77-1.02) | ||
| Maternal educational level | ||||
| No education | RC | RC | ||
| Primary education | 0.97 (0.85-1.10) | 1.06 (0.93-1.21) | ||
| Secondary and above | 0.81 | 0.97 (0.84-1.12) | ||
| Partner’s educational level | ||||
| No education | RC | RC | ||
| Primary education | 0.99 (0.86-1.13) | 1.03 (0.90-1.18) | ||
| Secondary and above | 1.08 (0.96-1.21) | 1.18 | ||
| Currently working | ||||
| No | RC | RC | ||
| Yes | 1.25 | 1.24 | ||
| Parity | ||||
| 1 | RC | RC | ||
| 2 | 0.88 (0.76-1.02) | 0.87 (0.75-1.01) | ||
| 3 | 0.96 (0.82-1.12) | 0.94 (0.80-1.09) | ||
| 4 and above | 0.98 (0.84-1.15) | 0.94 (0.80-1.10) | ||
| Religious affiliation | ||||
| Christianity | RC | RC | ||
| Islam | 1.68 | 1.23 | ||
| Traditionalist and others | 0.52 (0.84-1.15) | 0.62 (0.30-1.29) | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Hausa | RC | RC | ||
| Yoruba | 0.40 | 0.64 | ||
| Igbo | 0.59 | 0.85 (0.60-1.21) | ||
| Others | 0.80 | 0.75 | ||
| Media exposure | ||||
| No | RC | RC | ||
| Yes | 1.16 | 1.29 | ||
| Contextual level factors | ||||
| Region | ||||
| Urban | RC | RC | ||
| Rural | 0.93 (0.80-1.09) | 0.98 (0.84-1.14) | ||
| Wealth index | ||||
| Poorest | RC | RC | ||
| Poorer | 0.96 (0.86-1.08) | 0.92(0.81-1.03) | ||
| Middle | 0.89 (0.78-1.03) | 0.79 | ||
| Richer | 0.76 | 0.63 | ||
| Richest | 0.57 | 0.47 | ||
| Region | ||||
| North central | RC | RC | ||
| North east | 2.70 | 2.55 | ||
| North west | 1.35 | 1.07 (0.87-1.32) | ||
| South east | 0.67 | 0.65 | ||
| South south | 0.56 | 0.59 | ||
| South West | 0.61 | 0.66 | ||
| Sex of household head | ||||
| Male | RC | RC | ||
| Female | 1.09 (0.921.30) | 1.07 (0.90-1.27) | ||
| Community literacy level | ||||
| Low | RC | RC | ||
| Medium | 0.88 (0.75-1.03) | 0.88 (0.75-1.04) | ||
| High | 0.83 (0.67-1.02) | 0.86 (0.69-1.08) | ||
| Community socioeconomic status | ||||
| Low | RC | RC | ||
| Medium | 1.46 | 1.44 | ||
| High | 1.13 (0.93-1.37) | 1.12 (0.92-1.37) | ||
| Random effects results | ||||
| PSU variance (95%CI) | 0.93 (0.80-1.07) | 0.69 (0.59-0.81) | 0.50(0.42-0.60) | 0.81 (0.68-0.98) |
| ICC | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| LR test | χ2 = 1232.58, | χ2 = 791.15, | χ2 = 495.80, | χ2 = 429.18, |
| Wald χ2 | Reference | 867.18 | 474.43 | 1136.77 |
| Model fitness | ||||
| Log-likelihood | −10296.41 | −9829.99 | −10075.29 | −9699.42 |
| AIC | 20 596.83 | 19 709.98 | 20 184.58 | 19 478.83 |
| BIC | 20 613.33 | 19 916.23 | 20 324.84 | 19 808.85 |
| Number of clusters | 1388 | 1388 | 1388 | 1388 |
Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike’s information criterion; AOR, adjusted odds ratios; BIC, Schwarz’s Bayesian information criteria; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intra-class correlation; LR Test, likelihood ratio test; PSU, primary sampling unit; RC, reference category.
Weighted NDHS, 2018.
Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets.
Model 0 is the null model, a baseline model without any determinant variable.
Model I is adjusted for individual-level variables (Age of child, Sex of child, water source, toilet facilities, maternal age, women’s education, partner’s education, working status, parity, religious, ethnicity, exposure to mass media).
Model II is adjusted for contextual level variables (Place of residence, wealth index, region, sex of household head, community literacy level, community socio-economic status).
Model III is the final model adjusted for individual and contextual level variables.
P < .05. **P < .01. ***P < .001.