| Literature DB >> 30959743 |
Kantiya Petsong1, Soottawat Benjakul2, Soraya Chaturongakul3, Andrea I Moreno Switt4, Kitiya Vongkamjan5.
Abstract
Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium are major foodborne pathogens of concern worldwide. Bacteriophage applications have gained more interest for biocontrol in foods. This study isolated 36 Salmonella phages from several animal farms in Thailand and tested them on 47 Salmonella strains from several sources, including farms, seafood processing plant and humans in Thailand and USA. Phages were classified into three major groups. The estimated phage genome size showed the range from 50 ± 2 to 200 ± 2 kb. An effective phage cocktail consisting of three phages was developed. Approximately 4 log CFU/mL of S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium could be reduced. These phages revealed a burst size of up to 97.7 on S. Enteritidis and 173.7 PFU/cell on S. Typhimurium. Our phage cocktail could decrease S. Enteritidis on chicken meat and sunflower sprouts by 0.66 log CFU/cm² and 1.27 log CFU/g, respectively. S. Typhimurium on chicken meat and sunflower sprouts were decreased by 1.73 log CFU/cm² and 1.17 log CFU/g, respectively. Overall, animal farms in Thailand provided high abundance and diversity of Salmonella phages with the lysis ability on Salmonella hosts from various environments and continents. A developed phage cocktail suggests a potential biocontrol against Salmonella in fresh foods.Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella phage; Salmonella serovar; animal farm; chicken meat; phage cocktail; phage host range; sunflower sprout
Year: 2019 PMID: 30959743 PMCID: PMC6518243 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7040100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Salmonella strains used for phage isolation and determination of phage lysis profiles.
| Serovars | Isolates ID | Source (Country) |
|---|---|---|
| Agona | H2-016 * | Pig slaughterhouse (Thailand) |
| FSL S5-667 | Bovine (USA) | |
| Anatum | PSU-BS-104SL | Seafood processing plant (Thailand) |
| FSL A4-525 * | Bovine (USA) | |
| Braenderup | FSL S5-373 | Human (USA) |
| Cerro | FSL R8-242 | Bovine (USA) |
| Corvolis | PSU-BS-092SL | Animal farm (Thailand) |
| FSL R8-092 | Human (USA) | |
| Dublin | W1-016 | Dairy farm (Thailand) |
| FSL S5-368 | Bovine (USA) | |
| Enteritidis | FSL S5-371 | Human (USA) |
| Give | PSU-BS-181SL | Animal farm (Thailand) |
| H2-018 * | Dairy farm (Thailand) | |
| Heidelberg | FSL S5-455 | Human (USA) |
| Infantis | FSL S5-506 | Human (USA) |
| Javiana | FSL S5-406 | Human (USA) |
| Kedougou | H2-061 | Pig slaughterhouse (Thailand) |
| Kentucky | W1-010 * | Dairy farm (Thailand) |
| PSU-BS-058SL | Chicken farm (Thailand) | |
| PSU-BS-116SL | Seafood processing plant (Thailand) | |
| FSL S5-431 | Bovine (USA) | |
| Krefeld | PSU-BS-111SL | Seafood processing plant (Thailand) |
| Mbandaka | W1-015 | Dairy farm (Thailand) |
| PSU-BS-035SL | Chicken farm (Thailand) | |
| FSL A4-793 | Bovine (USA) | |
| Montevideo | FSL S5-474 | Bovine (USA) |
| FSL S5-403 | Bovine (USA) | |
| Muennster | FSL S5-917 | Bovine (USA) |
| Newport | FSL S5-548 | Bovine (USA) |
| Oranienburg | FSL R8-376 | Human (USA) |
| Ordonez | PSU-BS-181SL | Seafood processing plant (Thailand) |
| Panama | FSL S5-454 | Human (USA) |
| Rissen | H2-015 | Pig slaughterhouse (Thailand) |
| Saintpaul | FSL S5-369 | Human (USA) |
| Stanley | PSU-BS-001SL | Swine farm (Thailand) |
| H2-002 * | Pig slaughterhouse (Thailand) | |
| PSU-BS-041SALX | Seafood processing plant (Thailand) | |
| FSL S5-464 | Human (USA) | |
| Tennessee | PSU-BS-183SL | Seafood processing plant (Thailand) |
| Typhimurium | H2-001 * | Pig slaughterhouse (Thailand) |
| PSU-BS-014SL | Chicken farm (Thailand) | |
| FSL S5-370 | Human (USA) | |
| Virchow | FSL H2-117 * | Human (Thailand) |
| FSL S5-961 | Human (USA) | |
| Weltevreden | H2-031 | Pig slaughterhouse (Thailand) |
| PSU-BS-013SL | Chicken farm (Thailand) | |
| FSL R8-798 | Human (USA) |
* indicates strains of Salmonella used as hosts for Salmonella phage isolation.
Recovery of Salmonella phages from various animal farms in Thailand.
| Animal Farms (Sampling Date [mo/yr]) | Number of Sample (Number of Phages) |
|---|---|
| Sampling 1 (04/2014) | |
| Poultry farm; commercial | 1 (1) |
| Swine farm; commercial | 1 (0) |
| Goat farm; commercial | 1 (1) |
| Sampling 2 (08/2015) | |
| Bovine farm; free range | 1 (3) |
| Poultry farm; free range | 4 (15) |
| Sampling 3 (10/2016) | |
| Poultry farm; free range | 4 (16) |
| Total | 12 (36) |
Estimated genome size of representative Salmonella phages from various animal farms in this study.
| Source | Estimated Genome Size (kb) | |
|---|---|---|
| KP3 | Goat feces | 200 ± 2 |
| KP4 | Soil (poultry farm 2) | 105 ± 2 |
| KP5 | Poultry feces (poultry farm 3) | 60 ± 2 |
| KP6 | Poultry feed (poultry farm 2) | 72 ± 2 |
| KP7 | Soil (poultry farm 2) | 60 ± 2 |
| KP10 | Poultry feed (poultry farm 2) | 60 ± 2 |
| KP11 | Soil (poultry farm 2) | 60 ± 2 |
| KP34 | Poultry feces (poultry farm 1) | 60 ± 2 |
| KP38 | Bovine feces | 60 ± 2 |
| KP39 | Bovine feces | 50 ± 2 |
| KP41 | Drinking water (poultry farm 3) | 97 ± 2 |
| KP43 | Poultry feces (poultry farm 3) | 60 ± 2 |
| KP49 | Soil (poultry farm 3) | 60 ± 2 |
| KP50 | Poultry feces (poultry farm 3) | 103 ± 2 |
| KP53 | Poultry feces (poultry farm 3) | 50 ± 2 |
| KP54 | Soil (poultry farm 3) | 50 ± 2 |
| KP55 | Poultry feed (poultry farm 3) | 60 ± 2 |
Figure 1Heatmap representation of lysis profiles of 36 Salmonella phages tested (vertical axis) on 47 Salmonella host strains (horizontal axis) from Thailand and USA Phages were classified into three groups, including (A) broad, (B) narrow and (A*) special broad host range. Beige areas indicate lysis and darker areas indicate no lysis.
Phage susceptibility of different Salmonella serovars recovered from various sources.
| Serovars | Source | % Susceptibility (Level) a | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thailand | USA | ||
| Agona | Pig slaughterhouse | 41.7 (H) | - |
| Anatum | Bovine | - | 41.7 (H) |
| Enteritidis | Human | - | 50.0 (H) |
| Give | Animal farm | 63.9 (H) | - |
| Dairy farm | 50.0 (H) | - | |
| Kedougou | Pig slaughterhouse | 44.4 (H) | - |
| Kentucky | Dairy farm | 38.9 (H) | - |
| Chicken farm | 41.7 (H) | - | |
| Typhimurium | Pig slaughterhouse | 47.2 (H) | - |
| Chicken farm | 55.6 (H) | - | |
| Weltevreden | Pig slaughterhouse | 69.4 (H) | - |
| Chicken farm | 58.3 (H) | - | |
| Dublin | Bovine | - | 19.4 (M) |
| Kentucky | Seafood processing plant | 13.9 (M) | - |
| Rissen | Pig slaughterhouse | 27.8 (M) | - |
| Virchow | Human | - | 11.1 (M) |
| Weltevreden | Human | - | 13.9 (M) |
| Agona | Bovine | - | No lysis |
| Anatum | Seafood processing plant | 8.3 (L) | - |
| Braenderup | Human | - | No lysis |
| Cerro | Bovine | 2.8 (L) | - |
| Corvalis | Animal farm | 2.8 (L) | - |
| Human | 2.8 (L) | - | |
| Dublin | Dairy farm | 2.8 (L) | - |
| Heidelberg | Human | - | No lysis |
| Infantis | Human | - | No lysis |
| Javiana | Human | - | 8.3 (L) |
| Kentucky | Bovine | - | 5.6 (L) |
| Krefeld | Seafood processing plant | No lysis | - |
| Mbandaka | Dairy farm | 5.6 (L) | - |
| Chicken farm | No lysis | - | |
| Bovine | - | No lysis | |
| Montevideo | Bovine | - | No lysis |
| Bovine | - | No lysis | |
| Muennster | Bovine | - | 2.8 (L) |
| Newport | Bovine | - | 2.8 (L) |
| Oranienburg | Human | - | No lysis |
| Ordonez | Seafood processing plant | 5.6 (L) | - |
| Panama | Human | - | 2.8 (L) |
| Saintpaul | Human | - | No lysis |
| Stanley | Swine farm | 2.8 (L) | - |
| Pig slaughterhouse | 5.6 (L) | - | |
| Seafood processing plant | No lysis | - | |
| Human | - | No lysis | |
| Tennessee | Seafood processing plant | 2.8 (L) | - |
| Typhimurium | Human | - | 5.6 (L) |
| Virchow | Human | 5.6 (L) | - |
a Phage susceptibility level defined by % of total phages that could lyse each host strain (n = 36): <10% (Low; L); 11–30% (Medium; M); >31% (High; H). If no strain tested, ‘-’ is shown in table.
Lysis ability and efficiency of plating (EOP) of Salmonella phages on S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium.
| Reference | Target | Lysis Ability a | Level of EOP b | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phage Titer (PFU/mL) | |||||||||
| 107 | 106 | 105 | 104 | 103 | |||||
| KP1 | Anatum (A4-525) | Enteritidis | +++ | ++ | - | - | - | Medium | |
| Typhimurium | ++ | - | - | - | - | Medium | |||
| KP2 | Anatum (A4-525) | Enteritidis | +++ | +++ | ++ | - | - | Medium | |
| Typhimurium | +++ | ++ | - | - | - | Low | |||
| KP4 | Anatum (A4-525) | Enteritidis | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | - | Medium | |
| Typhimurium | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | - | Medium | |||
| KP5 | Anatum (A4-525) | Enteritidis | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | - | Medium | |
| Typhimurium | +++ | +++ | ++ | - | - | Medium | |||
| KP9 | Anatum (A4-525) | Enteritidis | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | - | High | |
| Typhimurium | +++ | + | - | - | - | Low | |||
| KP34 | Virchow (H2-117) | Enteritidis | +++ | +++ | ++ | - | - | Medium | |
| Typhimurium | ++ | - | - | - | - | Low | |||
| KP36 | Virchow (H2-117) | Enteritidis | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | - | Medium | |
| Typhimurium | ++ | - | - | - | - | Low | |||
| KP49 | Agona (H2-016) | Enteritidis | ++ | - | - | - | - | Low | |
| Typhimurium | ++ | - | - | - | - | Low | |||
| KP50 | Agona (H2-016) | Enteritidis | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | High | |
| Typhimurium | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | - | Medium | |||
a Clear zone or visible plaques were observed as +++, confluent lysis (clear spot); ++, semi-confluent lysis (semi-clear); +, turbidity without plaque formation. b EOP values were presented in 3 levels: high production (EOP ≥ 0.5), medium production. (0.01 ≤ EOP < 0.5) and low production (0.0001 < EOP < 0.01).
Latent period and burst size of Salmonella phages included in a phage cocktail preparation.
| Latent Period (min) | Burst Size (PFU/Cell) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOI 100 | MOI 10 | MOI 100 | MOI 10 | MOI 100 | MOI 10 | MOI 100 | MOI 10 | |
| KP4 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 25.1 | 16.6 | 70.8 | 19.1 |
| KP5 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 30.1 | 6.6 | 173.7 | 19.1 |
| KP50 | 40 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 97.7 | 37.2 | 112.2 | 28.8 |
Figure 2One-step growth curve of phage KP4, KP5 and KP50 on S. Enteritidis (A-1, A-2 and A-3) and S. Typhimurium (B-1, B-2 and B-3). MOI 100 presented by and MOI 10 presented by . Bars represent the mean standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 3Survival of (a) S. Enteritidis and (b) S. Typhimurium treated with a phage cocktail at 37 °C for 12 h. Control (non-phage cocktail treated) presented by and treatment of a phage cocktail presented by . Bars represent the mean standard deviation (n = 3). The sign (*) on the lines indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) of bacterial count between control and treatment during storage time for a given Salmonella strain. Different uppercase letters on the lines indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) of bacterial count among days of storage for a given Salmonella strain.
Figure 4Recovery of S. Enteritidis () and S. Typhimurium () artificially contaminated in (a) chicken meat and (b) sunflower sprouts treated with a phage cocktail and stored at 4 °C for 4 days. Control (non-phage cocktail treated) of S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium inoculated on both samples presented by solid line and dashed line, respectively. Bars represent the mean standard deviation (n = 3). The sign (*) on the bars indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) of bacterial count between control and treatment during storage time for a given Salmonella strain. Different uppercase letters on the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) of bacterial count among days of storage for a given Salmonella strain.
Lysis ability of a phage cocktail and individual phages included in a phage cocktail preparation on S. Enteritidis (SE) and S. Typhimurium (ST) after being treated with a phage cocktail.
| Treatment | Lysis Ability a | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cocktail | KP4 | KP5 | KP50 | ||||||
| Phage Titer (PFU/mL) | |||||||||
| 107 | 106 | 107 | 106 | 107 | 106 | 107 | 106 | ||
| Control SE (non-phage treatment) | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | |
| Control ST (non-phage treatment) | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | − | + | − | |
| Phage-treated SE | ++ | ++ | ++ | − | ++ | − | ++ | − | |
| Phage-treated ST | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | − | + | − | |
a Clear zone or visible plaques were observed as +++, confluent lysis (clear spot); ++, semi-confluent lysis (semi-clear); +, turbidity without plaque formation.
Estimated genome size of Salmonella phages isolated from animal farms in this study and Salmonella phage isolated from previous studies.
| Source of Isolation | Country | Estimated Genome Size (kb) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goat feces | Thailand | 200 ± 2 | This study |
| Bovine feces | Thailand | 50 ± 2, 60 ± 2 | This study |
| Poultry feed | Thailand | 60 ± 2, 72 ± 2 | This study |
| Soil (poultry farm) | Thailand | 50 ± 2, 60 ± 2, 105 ± 2 | This study |
| Drinking water (poultry farm) | Thailand | 97 ± 2 | This study |
| Poultry feces | Thailand | 50 ± 2, 60 ± 2, 103 ± 2 | This study |
| Dairy farms | USA | 22 to 156 | [ |
| Dairy farms | Thailand | 40 to 200 | [ |
| Sewage effluent | UK | 40, 48.5 and 155 | [ |
| Chicken feces | Korea | 240 | [ |
| Sewage (poultry farm) | Korea | 40 | [ |
| Water buffalo feces | Southern Italy | 39 | [ |
| Swine lagoon effluent (poultry farm) | UK | 42 | [ |