Literature DB >> 30954940

18F-Fluciclovine Parameters on Targeted Prostate Biopsy Associated with True Positivity in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo1, Akinyemi A Akintayo1, Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo1, Funmilayo I Tade2, Peter T Nieh3, Viraj A Master3, Mehrdad Alemozaffar3, Adeboye O Osunkoya3,4, Mark M Goodman1,5, Baowei Fei1,6,7, David M Schuster8.   

Abstract

We evaluated 18F-fluciclovine uptake parameters that correlate with true positivity for local recurrence in non-prostatectomy-treated patients.
Methods: Twenty-one patients (prostate-specific antigen level, 7.4 ± 6.8 ng/mL) with biochemical recurrence after nonprostatectomy local therapy (radiotherapy and cryotherapy) underwent dual-time-point 18F-fluciclovine (364.1 ± 37.7 MBq) PET/CT from pelvis to diaphragm. Prostatic uptake over background was delineated and coregistered to a prostate-biopsy-planning ultrasound. Transrectal biopsies of 18F-fluciclovine-defined targets were completed using a 3-dimensional visualization and navigation platform. Histologic analyses of lesions were completed. Lesion characteristics including SUVmax, target-to-background ratio (TBR), uptake pattern, and subjective reader's suspicion level were compared between true-positive (malignant) and false-positive (benign) lesions. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between PET and histologic findings. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were plotted to determine discriminatory cutoffs for TBR. Statistical significance was set at a P value of less than 0.05.
Results: Fifty lesions were identified in 21 patients on PET. Seventeen of 50 (34.0%) targeted lesions in 10 of 21 patients were positive for malignancy. True-positive lesions had a significantly higher SUVmax (6.62 ± 1.70 vs. 4.92 ± 1.27), marrow TBR (2.57 ± 0.81 vs. 1.69 ± 0.51), and blood-pool TBR (4.10 ± 1.17 vs. 2.99 ± 1.01) than false-positive lesions at the early time point (P < 0.01) and remained significant at the delayed time point, except for blood-pool TBR. Focal uptake (odds ratio, 12.07; 95% confidence interval, 2.98-48.80; P < 0.01) and subjective highest suspicion level (odds ratio, 10.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-99.69; P = 0.03) correlated with true positivity. Using the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, optimal cutoffs for marrow TBR were 1.9 (area under the curve, 0.82) and 1.8 (area under the curve, 0.85) at early and delayed imaging, respectively. With these cutoffs, 15 of 17 malignant lesions were identified at both time points; however, fewer false-positive lesions were detected at the delayed time point (5/33) than at the early time point (11/33).
Conclusion: True positivity of 18F-fluciclovine-targeted prostate biopsy in non-prostatectomy-treated patients correlates with focal uptake, TBR (blood pool and marrow), and subjective highest suspicion level. A marrow TBR of 1.9 at the early time point and 1.8 at the delayed time point had optimal discriminating capabilities. Despite the relatively low intraprostate positive predictive value (34.0%) with 18F-fluciclovine, application of these parameters to interpretative criteria may improve true positivity in the treated prostate.
© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-fluciclovine; prostate; recurrence; targeted biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30954940      PMCID: PMC6836857          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  33 in total

1.  PET-directed, 3D Ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; Peter T Nieh; David M Schuster; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Diagn Imaging Eur       Date:  2013-01

2.  Initial experience with the radiotracer anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid with PET/CT in prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  David M Schuster; John R Votaw; Peter T Nieh; Weiping Yu; Jonathon A Nye; Viraj Master; F DuBois Bowman; Muta M Issa; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Multisite Experience of the Safety, Detection Rate and Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Imaging in the Staging of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tore Bach-Gansmo; Cristina Nanni; Peter T Nieh; Lucia Zanoni; Tronde Velde Bogsrud; Heidi Sletten; Katrine Andersen Korsan; J Kieboom; Funmilayo I Tade; Oluwaseun Odewole; Albert Chau; Penelope Ward; Mark M Goodman; Stefano Fanti; David M Schuster; Frode Willoch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluciclovine on the Treatment of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Results from the LOCATE Trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; Lale Kostakoglu; Albert Chau; Fenghai Duan; Umar Mahmood; David A Mankoff; David M Schuster; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The treatment of prostate cancer by conventional radiation therapy: an analysis of long-term outcome.

Authors:  A L Zietman; J J Coen; K C Dallow; W U Shipley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Characterization of primary prostate carcinoma by anti-1-amino-2-[(18)F] -fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-3-[(18)F] FACBC) uptake.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Pooneh A Taleghani; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Rianot Amzat; Bital Savir-Baruch; Raghuveer K Halkar; Tim Fox; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Carlos S Moreno; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; Baowei Fei; Zhibo Wang; Zhengjia Chen; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-01-05

Review 7.  Early detection of prostate cancer relapse by biochemistry and diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  L Evangelista; F Zattoni; E Rossi; R J Karnes; V Lowe
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 8.  The role of imaging in the detection of prostate cancer local recurrence after radiation therapy and surgery.

Authors:  Darko Pucar; Tamar Sella; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 9.  [Multimodality MRI and PET for restaging prostate cancer after biochemical failure of the treatment].

Authors:  A Cochet; S Kanoun; O Humbert; P-M Walker; L Cormier; G Créhange; F Brunotte
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 1.018

10.  Improved synthesis of anti-[18F]FACBC: improved preparation of labeling precursor and automated radiosynthesis.

Authors:  Jonathan McConathy; Ronald J Voll; Weiping Yu; Ronald J Crowe; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.513

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Janelle T West; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  The Diagnostic Role of 18F-Choline, 18F-Fluciclovine and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Biochemical Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rang Wang; Guohua Shen; Mingxing Huang; Rong Tian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.