Literature DB >> 7751173

The treatment of prostate cancer by conventional radiation therapy: an analysis of long-term outcome.

A L Zietman1, J J Coen, K C Dallow, W U Shipley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term outcome of conventional external beam radiation therapy in the management of clinically confined prostate cancer and to examine the proposition that radiation accelerates tumor growth in those who fail treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One thousand and forty-four men with T1-4NxM0 prostate cancer treated by conventional external beam radiation therapy at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 1977 and 1991 were analyzed. Median follow-up was 49 months. Failure was defined as: two sequential rises in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level; or a PSA > 1 ng/ml 2 or more years after radiation; or any clinical failure. Kaplan-Meir actuarial analyses were used to assess outcome.
RESULTS: At 10 years only 40% of the T1-2 group remained disease free. When subdivided by grade, the well-differentiated tumors (Gleason 1-2) exhibited a 53% actuarial 10-year disease-free survival, moderately differentiated (Gleason 3) 42%, and poorly differentiated (Gleason 4-5) 20%. The corresponding values for the T3-4 men were 33% for Gleason 1-2, 20% for Gleason 3, and 10% for Gleason 4-5. Overall the value for T3-4 tumors was 18% at 10 years. On relapse the median PSA doubling times for the T1-2 patients were predicted by histology: 18.8 months for Gleason 1-2 patients; 11.1 months for Gleason 3; and 9.6 months for Gleason 5. Significant differences were found between the Gleason 3 and the Gleason 4-5 groups (p = 0.04) and the Gleason 1-2 and the Gleason 4-5 groups (p = 0.03). A wide range of doubling times was seen within each grade group. When compared with recently reported data on selected T1-2 patients who were managed by expectant observation there was no advantage over the first decade (and certainly no disadvantage) in terms of metastasis-free survival or disease-specific survival for the irradiated Gleason 1-3 patients. However, a gain was seen for those with Gleason 4-5 tumors.
CONCLUSION: Less than half of the T1-2NxM0 and less than one-fifth of the T3-4NxM0 patients receiving conventional radiation therapy were biochemically disease free at 10 years. The PSA doubling times on relapse show a wide variation. Grade was important in determining the rate of relapse suggesting that radiation does not induce a homogeneous acceleration of prostate tumors. A metastasis-free and disease-specific survival advantage was found for the poorly differentiated tumors when compared with similar patients reported in the literature who were managed initially by observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7751173     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00123-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Hatzimouratidis Konstantinos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Prostate cancer: 7. Radiation therapy for localized disease.

Authors:  P Warde; C Catton; M K Gospodarowicz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  18F-Fluciclovine Parameters on Targeted Prostate Biopsy Associated with True Positivity in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo; Funmilayo I Tade; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Mark M Goodman; Baowei Fei; David M Schuster
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  The change of PSA doubling time and its association with disease progression in patients with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen deprivation.

Authors:  Daniel Keizman; Peng Huang; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Victoria Sinibaldi; Michael A Carducci; Samuel Denmeade; Jenny J Kim; Janet Walczak; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 5.  Angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul G Kluetz; William D Figg; William L Dahut
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 6.  Management strategies for locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashesh B Jani
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Salvage robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution, 5-year experience.

Authors:  Samuel D Kaffenberger; Kirk A Keegan; Neil K Bansal; Todd M Morgan; Dominic H Tang; Daniel A Barocas; David F Penson; Rodney Davis; Peter E Clark; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Matthew D Greer; Sam Borofsky; Ismail M Kabakus; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-06

9.  A double-blind randomized crossover study of oral thalidomide versus placebo for androgen dependent prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen ablation.

Authors:  William D Figg; Maha H Hussain; James L Gulley; Philip M Arlen; Jeanny B Aragon-Ching; Daniel P Petrylak; Celestia S Higano; Seth M Steinberg; Gurkamal S Chatta; Howard Parnes; John J Wright; Oliver Sartor; William L Dahut
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Management of patients with biochemical recurrence after local therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Channing J Paller; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.