Literature DB >> 28753802

Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Large European Single-centre Cohort with Median 10-Year Follow-up.

Prabhakar Rajan1, Anna Hagman2, Prasanna Sooriakumaran3, Tommy Nyberg4, Anna Wallerstedt2, Christofer Adding2, Olof Akre5, Stefan Carlsson6, Abolfazl Hosseini2, Mats Olsson2, Lars Egevad7, Fredrik Wiklund8, Gunnar Steineck9, N Peter Wiklund10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) treatment has been widely adopted with limited evidence for long-term (>5 yr) oncologic efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes following RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of 885 patients who underwent RARP as monotherapy for PCa between 2002 and 2006 in a single European centre and followed up until 2016. INTERVENTION: RARP as monotherapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (BCRFS), salvage therapy (ST)-free survival (STFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and event-time distributions were compared using the log-rank test. Variables predictive of BCR and ST were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 167 BCRs, 110 STs, 16 PCa-related deaths, and 51 deaths from other/unknown causes. BCRFS, STFS, CSS, and OS rates were 81.8%, 87.5%, 98.5%, and 93.0%, respectively, at median follow-up of 10.5 yr. On multivariable analysis, the strongest independent predictors of both BCR and ST were preoperative Gleason score, pathological T stage, positive surgical margins (PSMs), and preoperative prostate-specific antigen. PSM >3mm/multifocal but not ≤3mm independently affected the risk of both BCR and ST. Study limitations include a lack of centralised histopathologic reporting, lymph node and post-operative tumour volume data in a historical cohort, and patient-reported outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: RARP appears to confer effective long-term oncologic efficacy. The risk of BCR or ST is unaffected by ≤3mm PSM, but further follow-up is required to determine any impact on CSS. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Robot-assisted surgery for prostate cancer is effective 10 yr after treatment. Very small (<3mm) amounts of cancer at the cut edge of the prostate do not appear to impact on recurrence risk and the need for additional treatment, but it is not yet known whether this affects the risk of death from prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Recurrence; Robot-assisted surgery; Salvage therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28753802     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  8 in total

1.  Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Marco Sebben; Paolo Corsi; Alessandro Tafuri; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Giovanni Cacciamani; Arianna Mariotto; Alberto Diminutto; Matteo Brunelli; Vincenzo De Marco; Salvatore Siracusano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-05

2.  A multi-surgeon learning curve analysis of overall and site-specific positive surgical margins after RARP and implications for training.

Authors:  Carlo Gandi; Angelo Totaro; Riccardo Bientinesi; Filippo Marino; Francesco Pierconti; Maurizio Martini; Andrea Russo; Marco Racioppi; PierFrancesco Bassi; Emilio Sacco
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Alessandro Tafuri; Marco Sebben; Nelia Amigoni; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Riccardo Rizzetto; Aliasger Shakir; Paolo Corsi; Leone Tiso; Clara Cerrato; Filippo Migliorini; Giovanni Novella; Matteo Brunelli; Riccardo Bernasconi; Vincenzo De Marco; Salvatore Siracusano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-09-24

4.  Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Alessandro Tafuri; Marco Sebben; Paolo Corsi; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Aliasger Shakir; Giovanni Cacciamani; Arianna Mariotto; Matteo Brunelli; Riccardo Bernasconi; Giovanni Novella; Vincenzo De Marco; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-05-30

Review 5.  Selection of patients for nerve sparing surgery in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  André N Vis; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Henk G van der Poel; Alexander Mottrie; Philip D Stricker; Marcus Graefen; Vipul Patel; Bernardo Rocco; Birgit Lissenberg-Witte; Pim J van Leeuwen
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-11-09

6.  Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Yang; Hsiao-Hsien Wang; Mohamed Fayez Hassouna; Manish Chand; William J S Huang; Hsiao-Jen Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Oncological and functional outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a single institution: a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jun-Koo Kang; Jae-Wook Chung; So Young Chun; Yun-Sok Ha; Seock Hwan Choi; Jun Nyung Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Ghil Suk Yoon; Hyun Tae Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Tae Gyun Kwon
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2018-12-31

8.  Degree of Preservation of Neurovascular Bundles in Radical Prostatectomy and Recurrence of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Elin Axén; Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Anders Bjartell; Stefan Carlsson; Eva Haglind; Jonas Hugosson; Anna Lantz; Marianne Månsson; Gunnar Steineck; Peter Wiklund; Johan Stranne
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-06-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.