Literature DB >> 35819591

Development and clinical applicability of MRI-based 3D prostate models in the planning of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Hans Veerman1,2,3, Thierry N Boellaard4, Jari A van der Eijk5,6, Judith H Sluijter5,6, Ton A Roeleveld7,8, Tim M van der Sluis9,7, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen9,7, Esther Wit5,7, Maarten J A van Alphen6, Robert L P van Veen6, André N Vis9,7, Henk G van der Poel5,9,7, Pim J van Leeuwen5,7.   

Abstract

The interpretation of conventional MRI may be limited by the two-dimensional presentation of the images. To develop patient-specific MRI prostate-based virtual and three-dimensional (3D)-printed models. To assess the association between 3D imaging and the pathological outcome of RARP specimen. To assess the clinical applicability of 3D models to guide nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We created virtual 3D and 3D-printed 3D models of 20 prostate cancer patients retrospectively. A comparison was made between conventional MRI and 3D-reconstructed images. The concordance between tumour lesion location in 3D models and pathology reporting of RARP specimens was assessed. Seven urologists assessed the side-specific extent of nerve-sparing based on (1) conventional MR images, (2) virtual 3D models, and (3) 3D-printed models. Clinically relevant changes in nerve-sparing and the absolute agreement between observers was analyzed using the Chi-square test and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The index lesion was correctly visualized in 19/20 (95%) 3D models and the expected location of extraprostatic extension was correctly visualized in all 3D models. Clinically relevant changes in the planned extent of nerve-sparing between MRI and virtual 3D models and MRI and 3D-printed models were found in 25% and 26%. The ICC of the planned extent of nerve-sparing between urologists was 0.40 (95% CI 0.28-0.55) for conventional MRI, 0.52 (95% CI 0.39-0.66) for virtual 3D models and 0.58 (95% CI 0.45-0.71) for 3D-printed models. 3D models of the MRI prostate to guide RARP could aid urologists in the planning of nerve-sparing surgery as shown by a higher inter-observer agreement.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Nerve-sparing; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Three-dimensional images

Year:  2022        PMID: 35819591     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01443-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  16 in total

1.  "Pin the Tumor on the Kidney:" An Evaluation of How Surgeons Translate CT and MRI Data to 3D Models.

Authors:  Nicole Wake; James S Wysock; Marc A Bjurlin; Hersh Chandarana; William C Huang
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.

Authors:  Antonio Benito Porcaro; Marco Sebben; Paolo Corsi; Alessandro Tafuri; Tania Processali; Marco Pirozzi; Nelia Amigoni; Riccardo Rizzetto; Giovanni Cacciamani; Arianna Mariotto; Alberto Diminutto; Matteo Brunelli; Vincenzo De Marco; Salvatore Siracusano; Walter Artibani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-05

3.  Quantitative assessment of fascia preservation improves the prediction of membranous urethral length and inner levator distance on continence outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Rosanne van der Roest; Daan Schouten; Francesca Cavicchioli; Corine Tillier; Axel Bex; Ivo Schoots; Walter Artibani; Stijn Heijmink; Henk Van Der Poel
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  G H KleinJan; K Sikorska; C M Korne; O R Brouwer; T Buckle; C Tillier; R C M van der Roest; J de Jong; F W B van Leeuwen; H G van der Poel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-09-03

5.  Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality.

Authors:  Min Soo Choo; Sung Yong Cho; Kyungtae Ko; Chang Wook Jeong; Seung Bae Lee; Ja Hyeon Ku; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten de Rooij; Esther H J Hamoen; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Erik Briers; Thomas Van den Broeck; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Stefano Fanti; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Silke Gillessen; Nikos Grivas; Jeremy Grummet; Ann M Henry; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Thomas B Lam; Michael Lardas; Matthew Liew; Malcolm D Mason; Lisa Moris; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Henk G van der Poel; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Derya Tilki; Thomas Wiegel; Peter-Paul M Willemse; Philip Cornford
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Alberto Briganti; James A Eastham; Jonathan Epstein; Markus Graefen; Rodolfo Montironi; Karim Touijer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Role of extent of fascia preservation and erectile function after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  H G van der Poel; W de Blok
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.