Literature DB >> 3095180

Genetic divergence under uniform selection. II. Different responses to selection for knockdown resistance to ethanol among Drosophila melanogaster populations and their replicate lines.

F M Cohan, A A Hoffmann.   

Abstract

We have tested the hypothesis that genetic differences among conspecific populations may result in diverse responses to selection, using natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Selection for ethanol tolerance in a tube measuring knockdown resistance was imposed on five West Coast populations. In 24 generations the selected lines increased their mean knockdown times, on average, by a factor of 2.7. An initially weak latitudinal cline was steepened by selection. The two southernmost populations showed the same increases in the selected character, but differed consistently in their correlated responses in characters related to ethanol tolerance. This result indicates that the populations responded to selection by different genetic changes. Selection decreased female body weight and increased resistance to acetone, suggesting components of the response unrelated to ethanol metabolism. The Adhs allele was favored by selection in all populations at the onset, but increased in frequency only in the selected lines of the southernmost population. There was a correlation between latitude and Adh frequency changes, suggesting that fitnesses of the Adh alleles were dependent on the genetic background. Genetic background also had a large effect on the loss of fitness due to selection. Genetic drift between replicate lines caused more variation in selection response than initial genetic differences between populations. This result demonstrates the importance of genetic drift in divergence among natural populations undergoing uniform selection, since the effective population sizes approached those of small natural populations. Drift caused greater divergence between selected replicates than control replicates. Implications of this result for the genetic model of selection response are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3095180      PMCID: PMC1202927     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  5 in total

1.  Selection and body size in Drosophila pseudoobscura at different temperatures.

Authors:  M DRUGER
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

3.  Ethanol metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M C Deltombe-Lietaert; J Delcour; N Lenelle-Monfort; A Elens
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1979-05-15

4.  Selection for ethanol tolerance in two populations of Drosophila melanogaster segregating alcohol dehydrogenase allozymes.

Authors:  J B Gibson; N Lewis; M A Adena; S R Wilson
Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci       Date:  1979-06

5.  Genetic variability of alcohol dehydrogenase among Australian Drosophila species: correlation of ADH biochemical phenotype with ethanol resource utilization.

Authors:  R S Holmes; L N Moxon; P A Parsons
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1980-11
  5 in total
  21 in total

1.  Playing Darwin. Part A. Experimental evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Margarida Matos
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Complex genetic changes in strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived by selection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Joshua T Witten; Christina T L Chen; Barak A Cohen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Microarray analysis of replicate populations selected against a wing-shape correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kenneth E Weber; Ralph J Greenspan; David R Chicoine; Katia Fiorentino; Mary H Thomas; Theresa L Knight
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Reproductive fitness and artificial selection in animal breeding: culling on fitness prevents a decline in reproductive fitness in lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased inebriation time.

Authors:  R Frankham; B H Yoo; B L Sheldon
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Response of two heat shock genes to selection for knockdown heat resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G McColl; A A Hoffmann; S W McKechnie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic divergence and fitness convergence under uniform selection in experimental populations of bacteria.

Authors:  R Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Olfactory responses of Drosophila melanogaster selected for knockdown resistance to ethanol.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; F M Cohan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  An airtight approach to the inebriometer: from construction to application with volatile anesthetics.

Authors:  Adam G Dawson; Paniz Heidari; Sudhindra R Gadagkar; Michael J Murray; Gerald B Call
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 9.  Dietary restriction in rats and mice: a meta-analysis and review of the evidence for genotype-dependent effects on lifespan.

Authors:  William R Swindell
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 10.895

10.  Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and Divergence Among Replicate Selected Drosophila Lines.

Authors:  Philippa C Griffin; Sandra B Hangartner; Alexandre Fournier-Level; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.