Literature DB >> 28007884

Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and Divergence Among Replicate Selected Drosophila Lines.

Philippa C Griffin1, Sandra B Hangartner2,3, Alexandre Fournier-Level2, Ary A Hoffmann2.   

Abstract

Adaptation to environmental stress is critical for long-term species persistence. With climate change and other anthropogenic stressors compounding natural selective pressures, understanding the nature of adaptation is as important as ever in evolutionary biology. In particular, the number of alternative molecular trajectories available for an organism to reach the same adaptive phenotype remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate this issue in a set of replicated Drosophila melanogaster lines selected for increased desiccation resistance-a classical physiological trait that has been closely linked to Drosophila species distributions. We used pooled whole-genome sequencing (Pool-Seq) to compare the genetic basis of their selection responses, using a matching set of replicated control lines for characterizing laboratory (lab-)adaptation, as well as the original base population. The ratio of effective population size to census size was high over the 21 generations of the experiment at 0.52-0.88 for all selected and control lines. While selected SNPs in replicates of the same treatment (desiccation-selection or lab-adaptation) tended to change frequency in the same direction, suggesting some commonality in the selection response, candidate SNP and gene lists often differed among replicates. Three of the five desiccation-selection replicates showed significant overlap at the gene and network level. All five replicates showed enrichment for ovary-expressed genes, suggesting maternal effects on the selected trait. Divergence between pairs of replicate lines for desiccation-candidate SNPs was greater than between pairs of control lines. This difference also far exceeded the divergence between pairs of replicate lines for neutral SNPs. Overall, while there was overlap in the direction of allele frequency changes and the network and functional categories affected by desiccation selection, replicates showed unique responses at all levels, likely reflecting hitchhiking effects, and highlighting the challenges in identifying candidate genes from these types of experiments when traits are likely to be polygenic.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pool-Seq; climate adaptation; experimental evolution; natural variation; population genomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28007884      PMCID: PMC5289857          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.187104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  87 in total

Review 1.  Desiccation and starvation resistance in Drosophila: patterns of variation at the species, population and intrapopulation levels.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; L G Harshman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic divergence under uniform selection. II. Different responses to selection for knockdown resistance to ethanol among Drosophila melanogaster populations and their replicate lines.

Authors:  F M Cohan; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Demographic factors and genetic variation influence population persistence under environmental change.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Fundamental evolutionary limits in ecological traits drive Drosophila species distributions.

Authors:  Vanessa Kellermann; Belinda van Heerwaarden; Carla M Sgrò; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The effect of selection environment on the probability of parallel evolution.

Authors:  Susan F Bailey; Nicolas Rodrigue; Rees Kassen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Is adaptation to climate change really constrained in niche specialists?

Authors:  Belinda van Heerwaarden; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Selection for increased desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: additive genetic control and correlated responses for other stresses.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; P A Parsons
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Patterns of linkage disequilibrium and long range hitchhiking in evolving experimental Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Susanne U Franssen; Viola Nolte; Ray Tobler; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genome-wide patterns of latitudinal differentiation among populations of Drosophila melanogaster from North America.

Authors:  Daniel K Fabian; Martin Kapun; Viola Nolte; Robert Kofler; Paul S Schmidt; Christian Schlötterer; Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  18 in total

1.  Local ancestry analysis reveals genomic convergence in extremophile fishes.

Authors:  Anthony P Brown; Kerry L McGowan; Enrique J Schwarzkopf; Ryan Greenway; Lenin Arias Rodriguez; Michael Tobler; Joanna L Kelley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics and genome-wide association genome-wide association analysis of desiccation tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Subhash Rajpurohit; Eran Gefen; Alan O Bergland; Dmitri A Petrov; Allen G Gibbs; Paul S Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  How is epigenetics predicted to contribute to climate change adaptation? What evidence do we need?

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  A simple genetic basis of adaptation to a novel thermal environment results in complex metabolic rewiring in Drosophila.

Authors:  François Mallard; Viola Nolte; Ray Tobler; Martin Kapun; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 5.  Comparative studies of critical physiological limits and vulnerability to environmental extremes in small ectotherms: How much environmental control is needed?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.654

6.  Dissection of Complex, Fitness-Related Traits in Multiple Drosophila Mapping Populations Offers Insight into the Genetic Control of Stress Resistance.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Everman; Casey L McNeil; Jennifer L Hackett; Clint L Bain; Stuart J Macdonald
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genomic divergence and adaptive convergence in Drosophila simulans from Evolution Canyon, Israel.

Authors:  Lin Kang; Eugenia Rashkovetsky; Katarzyna Michalak; Harold R Garner; James E Mahaney; Beverly A Rzigalinski; Abraham Korol; Eviatar Nevo; Pawel Michalak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genetic redundancy fuels polygenic adaptation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Neda Barghi; Raymond Tobler; Viola Nolte; Ana Marija Jakšić; François Mallard; Kathrin Anna Otte; Marlies Dolezal; Thomas Taus; Robert Kofler; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Benchmarking software tools for detecting and quantifying selection in evolve and resequencing studies.

Authors:  Christos Vlachos; Claire Burny; Marta Pelizzola; Rui Borges; Andreas Futschik; Robert Kofler; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Quantifying Selection with Pool-Seq Time Series Data.

Authors:  Thomas Taus; Andreas Futschik; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.