Literature DB >> 30949925

Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory.

James F Juola1, Alexandra Caballero-Sanz2, Adrián R Muñoz-García2, Juan Botella2, Manuel Suero2.   

Abstract

The Atkinson-Shiffrin theory describes and explains some of the processes involved in storing and retrieving information in human memory. Here we examine predictions of related models for search and decision processes in recognizing information in long-term memory. In some models, recognition is presumably based on a test item's familiarity judgment, and subsequent decisions follow from the sensitivity and decision parameters of signal detection theory. Other models dispense with the continuous notion of familiarity and base recognition on discrete internal states such as relative certainty that an item has or has not been previously studied, with an intermediate state of uncertainty that produces guesses. Still others are hybrid models with two criteria located along a familiarity continuum defining areas for rapid decisions based on high or low familiarities. For intermediate familiarity values, the decision can be delayed pending the results of search for, and occasional recollection of, relevant episodic information. Here we present the results from a study of human recognition memory for lists of words using both response time and error data to construct receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves derived from three standard methods based on the same data set. Models are evaluated against, and parameters estimated from, group as well as individual subjects' behavior. We report substantially different ROC curves when they are based on variations in target-word frequency, confidence judgments, and response latencies. The results indicate that individual versus group data must be used with caution in determining the appropriate theoretical interpretation of recognition memory performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Familiarity vs. recollection; Memory models; Recognition memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30949925     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00922-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  38 in total

Review 1.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Colleen M Parks
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Binary ROCs in perception and recognition memory are curved.

Authors:  Chad Dube; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Signal detection and threshold modeling of confidence-rating ROCs: A critical test with minimal assumptions.

Authors:  David Kellen; Karl Christoph Klauer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Task effects determine whether recognition memory is mediated discretely or continuously.

Authors:  Ryan M McAdoo; Kylie N Key; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

6.  Group analyses can hide heterogeneity effects when searching for a general model: Evidence based on a conflict monitoring task.

Authors:  Juan Botella; Jesús Privado; Manuel Suero; Roberto Colom; James F Juola
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2019-01-11

7.  MPTinR: analysis of multinomial processing tree models in R.

Authors:  Henrik Singmann; David Kellen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-06

8.  Recognition memory models and binary-response ROCs: a comparison by minimum description length.

Authors:  David Kellen; Karl Christoph Klauer; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

9.  Further evidence for discrete-state mediation in recognition memory.

Authors:  David Kellen; Henrik Singmann; Jan Vogt; Karl Christoph Klauer
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2015

10.  Assessing recognition memory using confidence ratings and response times.

Authors:  Christoph T Weidemann; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Maria M Robinson; Jamal R Williams; John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-10-19

2.  Closing the door to false memory: the effects of levels-of-processing and stimulus type on the rejection of perceptually vs. semantically dissimilar distractors.

Authors:  Marek Nieznański; Michał Obidziński
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.