Literature DB >> 7983467

Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model.

A P Yonelinas1.   

Abstract

Evidence is presented that recognition judgments are based on an assessment of familiarity, as is described by signal detection theory, but that a separate recollection process also contributes to performance. In 3 receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) experiments, the process dissociation procedure was used to examine the contribution of these processes to recognition memory. In Experiments 1 and 2, reducing the length of the study list increased the intercept (d') but decreased the slope of the ROC and increased the probability of recollection but left familiarity relatively unaffected. In Experiment 3, increasing study time increased the intercept but left the slope of the ROC unaffected and increased both recollection and familiarity. In all 3 experiments, judgments based on familiarity produced a symmetrical ROC (slope = 1), but recollection introduced a skew such that the slope of the ROC decreased.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7983467     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  299 in total

1.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis.

Authors:  B McElree; P O Dolan; L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Using ROC curves to test models of recognition memory: the relationship between presentation duration and slope.

Authors:  E Hirshman; M Hostetter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

3.  Recognition memory for faces: when familiarity supports associative recognition judgments.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas; N E Kroll; I G Dobbins; M Soltani
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

Review 4.  Dual processes in recognition: does a focus on measurement operations provide a sufficient foundation?

Authors:  M S Humphreys; S Dennis; K A Chalmers; S Finnigan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

5.  Learning artificial grammars: no evidence for the acquisition of rules.

Authors:  A Kinder; A Assmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

6.  Predicting individual false alarm rates and signal detection theory: a role for remembering.

Authors:  I G Dobbins; W Khoe; A P Yonelinas; N E Kroll
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

7.  A grouping interpretation of the modality effect in immediate probed recognition.

Authors:  D J Murray; N Boudreau; K K Burggraf; L Dobell; S L Guger; A Leask; L Stanford; T L Tate; M Wheeler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

8.  Psychophysics of remembering.

Authors:  K G White; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Associative recognition: a case of recall-to-reject processing.

Authors:  C M Rotello; E Heit
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

10.  Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  T Curran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.